Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a virologist and former postdoctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong, repeated the theory on Fox News, saying, "I can present solid scientific evidence to our audience that this virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature. It is a man-made virus created in the lab."
According to wikipedia, Yan's claims have been debunked by scientific community. John Hopkins university found inaccurate information that doesn't support argument. Peer reviews describe her research as flawed, non-scientific, junk science and political propaganda.
7
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a virologist and former postdoctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong, repeated the theory on Fox News, saying, "I can present solid scientific evidence to our audience that this virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature. It is a man-made virus created in the lab."
According to wikipedia, Yan's claims have been debunked by scientific community. John Hopkins university found inaccurate information that doesn't support argument. Peer reviews describe her research as flawed, non-scientific, junk science and political propaganda.
Science evolves depending on what scientists learn over time. Currently, scientific consensus favors natural origin of coronavirus over lab theory for good reasons. Very unlikely virus originates from lab because of a complete lack of proof. Genome shows no evidence of manipulation. Unlikely bio-engineering leaves no genetic signature. Other types of coronaviruses have similar features, providing evidence they evolve naturally. However very likely coronavirus has natural origin. 60% of known infectious diseases and 75% of all new diseases in humans have animal origins. For examples, ebola, bird flu, influenza, HIV, swine flu, etc. Every year, there is a new infectious disease that originates from animals. So far, best information available comes from direct investigations on the ground by China and World health organization. Of course, findings are inconclusive and more research is needed.
Post your proof that Covid-19 spread because it was transmitted from animals to humans.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Science evolves depending on what scientists learn over time. Currently, scientific consensus favors natural origin of coronavirus over lab theory for good reasons. Very unlikely virus originates from lab because of a complete lack of proof. Genome shows no evidence of manipulation. Unlikely bio-engineering leaves no genetic signature. Other types of coronaviruses have similar features, providing evidence they evolve naturally. However very likely coronavirus has natural origin. 60% of known infectious diseases and 75% of all new diseases in humans have animal origins. For examples, ebola, bird flu, influenza, HIV, swine flu, etc. Every year, there is a new infectious disease that originates from animals. So far, best information available comes from direct investigations on the ground by China and World health organization. Of course, findings are inconclusive and more research is needed.
Post your proof that Covid-19 spread because it was transmitted from animals to humans.
Science evolves depending on what scientists learn over time. Currently, scientific consensus favors natural origin of coronavirus over lab theory for good reasons. Very unlikely virus originates from lab because of a complete lack of proof. Genome shows no evidence of manipulation. Unlikely bio-engineering leaves no genetic signature. Other types of coronaviruses have similar features, providing evidence they evolve naturally. However very likely coronavirus has natural origin. 60% of known infectious diseases and 75% of all new diseases in humans have animal origins. For examples, ebola, bird flu, influenza, HIV, swine flu, etc. Every year, there is a new infectious disease that originates from animals. So far, best information available comes from direct investigations on the ground by China and World health organization. Of course, findings are inconclusive and more research is needed.
There is 100% acknowledgement that the WHO has been compromised by China's funding and control of the investigations.
The Wet Market in Wuhan did not and never have sold bats for consummation.Bats are not considered of any healthful value and are considered a vulgar cuisine of South-East Asia.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Science evolves depending on what scientists learn over time. Currently, scientific consensus favors natural origin of coronavirus over lab theory for good reasons. Very unlikely virus originates from lab because of a complete lack of proof. Genome shows no evidence of manipulation. Unlikely bio-engineering leaves no genetic signature. Other types of coronaviruses have similar features, providing evidence they evolve naturally. However very likely coronavirus has natural origin. 60% of known infectious diseases and 75% of all new diseases in humans have animal origins. For examples, ebola, bird flu, influenza, HIV, swine flu, etc. Every year, there is a new infectious disease that originates from animals. So far, best information available comes from direct investigations on the ground by China and World health organization. Of course, findings are inconclusive and more research is needed.
There is 100% acknowledgement that the WHO has been compromised by China's funding and control of the investigations.
The Wet Market in Wuhan did not and never have sold bats for consummation.Bats are not considered of any healthful value and are considered a vulgar cuisine of South-East Asia.
Who cares if it's man made or not. The virus is here for one reason, and that is to depopulate the Earth. There's just too many of us around. And too much bickering
I give ya a thumbs UP for that!
Sometimes I just gottaspeak up sac. Can't believe some of the crazy chit in the last couple of years. And yes the planet is over-populated and something will have to give I'm afraid.
And I do care where it comes from so maybe we can prevent the same event again.
Ever watch Air Disasters on Smithsonian Channel? The NTSB investigations into air crashes is amazing! Why do they do it? To prevent a discovered weakness from causing another crash. TWA flight 800 was a good one.
Clinton's FBI publically said it was a bomb before investigation was over.
Pierre Salinger is best known as President John F. Kennedy’s press secretary. He had over 100 witnesses who said they saw a missle hit the 747.
Turns out air conditioner units under a fuel tank heated the fuel to it's flammable point and a short circuit provided the spark that blew the jet apart. The NTSB put that jet back together piece by piece to find what actually happened.
You look up TWA 800 on Wikipedia and you see the FBI's and Salinger's theories as "CONSPIRACY THEORIES". No conspiracy, just got it wrong. The FBI thought they detected explosive residue but they had the Navy pulling wreckage from the sea. Belief is some Navy personnel had residue on their boots. Witnesses thought they saw a missle. What they saw was the nose blowing off and the fuselage going straight up in flames.
So why mention TWA 800? Watching this show reminds me of the beliefs of the origin of COVID. There is NO concrete evidence on where it originated. Yet it was determined not to be from lab. Why the early determination? Because Trump pointed to the lab?
A virus just happens to emerge in an area where there is a Level 4 lab, (BSL-4), the only BSL-4 lab in China. That lab just happened to have that bat virus. There was intel that said there was a bio-abnormality happening to lab employees in October.
We SHOULD find out. There SHOULD be a complete investigation. Looks like China won't let that happen.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Who cares if it's man made or not. The virus is here for one reason, and that is to depopulate the Earth. There's just too many of us around. And too much bickering
I give ya a thumbs UP for that!
Sometimes I just gottaspeak up sac. Can't believe some of the crazy chit in the last couple of years. And yes the planet is over-populated and something will have to give I'm afraid.
And I do care where it comes from so maybe we can prevent the same event again.
Ever watch Air Disasters on Smithsonian Channel? The NTSB investigations into air crashes is amazing! Why do they do it? To prevent a discovered weakness from causing another crash. TWA flight 800 was a good one.
Clinton's FBI publically said it was a bomb before investigation was over.
Pierre Salinger is best known as President John F. Kennedy’s press secretary. He had over 100 witnesses who said they saw a missle hit the 747.
Turns out air conditioner units under a fuel tank heated the fuel to it's flammable point and a short circuit provided the spark that blew the jet apart. The NTSB put that jet back together piece by piece to find what actually happened.
You look up TWA 800 on Wikipedia and you see the FBI's and Salinger's theories as "CONSPIRACY THEORIES". No conspiracy, just got it wrong. The FBI thought they detected explosive residue but they had the Navy pulling wreckage from the sea. Belief is some Navy personnel had residue on their boots. Witnesses thought they saw a missle. What they saw was the nose blowing off and the fuselage going straight up in flames.
So why mention TWA 800? Watching this show reminds me of the beliefs of the origin of COVID. There is NO concrete evidence on where it originated. Yet it was determined not to be from lab. Why the early determination? Because Trump pointed to the lab?
A virus just happens to emerge in an area where there is a Level 4 lab, (BSL-4), the only BSL-4 lab in China. That lab just happened to have that bat virus. There was intel that said there was a bio-abnormality happening to lab employees in October.
We SHOULD find out. There SHOULD be a complete investigation. Looks like China won't let that happen.
Former CDC chief says "most likely" cause of coronavirus is that it "escaped" from a lab https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/covid-lab-theory-robert-redfield-no-evidence/
Yes it did escape from a weopon viral research lab in wuhan. Now the debate is that it was captured in the wild brought to lab for study.
Ok . Where in this natural world was the original specimen captured. Where is the original site of this cross over natural evolvement ... bat cave k ... which one?
It escaped from the lab cause it was manufactured there... is what Dr. FAUCCI is considering as possible. But not probable.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Former CDC chief says "most likely" cause of coronavirus is that it "escaped" from a lab https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/covid-lab-theory-robert-redfield-no-evidence/
Yes it did escape from a weopon viral research lab in wuhan. Now the debate is that it was captured in the wild brought to lab for study.
Ok . Where in this natural world was the original specimen captured. Where is the original site of this cross over natural evolvement ... bat cave k ... which one?
It escaped from the lab cause it was manufactured there... is what Dr. FAUCCI is considering as possible. But not probable.
Conjectures that a medical assistant who had tickets to fiba world match foot ball. Yes soccer was held in wuhan. Was sloppy in protocols of decontainmination procedures .
She was late . And such the original wuhan out bemreak could be traced to about 8 weeks after military Olympic world games was held in wuhan.
There the top spec ops In different disciplines vie for top soldier honors....
Both dates deal with the original covid 19 wuhan out break as origination... again same problem sloppy protocols.
And both dates and then world out break dates centered in military installations the fact you could carry it for a couple weeks with no symptoms...
Gave way to the world wide outbreak.
0
As for the escaped the lab theory.
Conjectures that a medical assistant who had tickets to fiba world match foot ball. Yes soccer was held in wuhan. Was sloppy in protocols of decontainmination procedures .
She was late . And such the original wuhan out bemreak could be traced to about 8 weeks after military Olympic world games was held in wuhan.
There the top spec ops In different disciplines vie for top soldier honors....
Both dates deal with the original covid 19 wuhan out break as origination... again same problem sloppy protocols.
And both dates and then world out break dates centered in military installations the fact you could carry it for a couple weeks with no symptoms...
The virus is here to advance the Great Reset and other interests of the globalists The same as terrorism The same as global warming
The virus was by all genome patterns a derived virus from an aboriginal virus found in a meat packing facility sewer system in Spain..
The metric of engagement is that this specie as it most closely resembles the covid 19 specie of any specie would of evolved to the present genome to this futuristic genome only in a lab.
Now the intention of the study at the lab is in dispute. The lab who naturally harvested the specimen was deriving a virus that could degrade sewage more efficiently for the bio fuel burning application.
Or were that building a bio weapon... I don't know but no in allowed in the viral institute of wuhan. Not even the WHO.
The dates of the out break and world events staged between Aug and Dec in wuhan can then give way of why so many were infected so quickly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
The virus is here to advance the Great Reset and other interests of the globalists The same as terrorism The same as global warming
The virus was by all genome patterns a derived virus from an aboriginal virus found in a meat packing facility sewer system in Spain..
The metric of engagement is that this specie as it most closely resembles the covid 19 specie of any specie would of evolved to the present genome to this futuristic genome only in a lab.
Now the intention of the study at the lab is in dispute. The lab who naturally harvested the specimen was deriving a virus that could degrade sewage more efficiently for the bio fuel burning application.
Or were that building a bio weapon... I don't know but no in allowed in the viral institute of wuhan. Not even the WHO.
The dates of the out break and world events staged between Aug and Dec in wuhan can then give way of why so many were infected so quickly.
"The FBI is investigating a suspicious package filled with white powder and bearing a threat of violence that arrived at Republican Sen. Rand Paul's home in Kentucky today," Fox reported. "On the outside of the envelope was a picture of a bruised and bandaged Paul with a gun to his head and a threat printed beneath it: 'I'll finish what your neighbor started you motherf*cker.'"
No one is safe anymore in our country. Any nutjob can change a life in a NY minute.
1
"The FBI is investigating a suspicious package filled with white powder and bearing a threat of violence that arrived at Republican Sen. Rand Paul's home in Kentucky today," Fox reported. "On the outside of the envelope was a picture of a bruised and bandaged Paul with a gun to his head and a threat printed beneath it: 'I'll finish what your neighbor started you motherf*cker.'"
No one is safe anymore in our country. Any nutjob can change a life in a NY minute.
Former CDC chief says "most likely" cause of coronavirus is that it "escaped" from a lab
During senate hearing, CDC chief Walensky says most coronaviruses come from an animal. Center for disease control website says that while the exact source of outbreak is unknown, we know that coronavirus originally came from an animal. Current coronavirus outbreak isn't the first and won't be the last. Evidences supporting animal origin are far stronger than for lab origin. Majority of scientists already believe natural origin is far more plausible. Burden of providing proof is greater for conspiracy theorists but they cannot prove that coronavirus came from a lab.
2
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Former CDC chief says "most likely" cause of coronavirus is that it "escaped" from a lab
During senate hearing, CDC chief Walensky says most coronaviruses come from an animal. Center for disease control website says that while the exact source of outbreak is unknown, we know that coronavirus originally came from an animal. Current coronavirus outbreak isn't the first and won't be the last. Evidences supporting animal origin are far stronger than for lab origin. Majority of scientists already believe natural origin is far more plausible. Burden of providing proof is greater for conspiracy theorists but they cannot prove that coronavirus came from a lab.
"The FBI is investigating a suspicious package filled with white powder and bearing a threat of violence that arrived at Republican Sen. Rand Paul's home in Kentucky today," Fox reported. "On the outside of the envelope was a picture of a bruised and bandaged Paul with a gun to his head and a threat printed beneath it: 'I'll finish what your neighbor started you motherf*cker.'" No one is safe anymore in our country. Any nutjob can change a life in a NY minute.
His coke dealer goes too far.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
"The FBI is investigating a suspicious package filled with white powder and bearing a threat of violence that arrived at Republican Sen. Rand Paul's home in Kentucky today," Fox reported. "On the outside of the envelope was a picture of a bruised and bandaged Paul with a gun to his head and a threat printed beneath it: 'I'll finish what your neighbor started you motherf*cker.'" No one is safe anymore in our country. Any nutjob can change a life in a NY minute.
So how does "Main Stream Media" handle this credible theory they so DENIED.
New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman on CNN;
"I think it is important to remember that part of the issue is when this was first being reported on and discussed back a few months after the pandemic had begun, was that then President Trump and Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, suggested they’ve seen evidence that this was formed in a lab and they also suggested that is was not released on purpose. But they refused to release the evidence showing what it was and so because of that made this instantly political," Haberman said.
In May 2020, Kessler (Washington Post Factchecker) said it was "virtually impossible" for the virus to originate from a lab. When Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., suggested the coronavirus was connected to research being done in Wuhan, China, the Washington Post said Cotton was pushing a "fringe theory."
Todd Zwillich, deputy Washington bureau chief for Vice News and former guest host for NPR’s 1A radio show, said Trump and conservative media weren’t discussing the lab leak hypothesis in "good faith."
Ohhhhhh, It's all Trump's fault that he was right and you all turned on him pedaling false information with no proof.
HOW PATHETIC!!!!!
2
So how does "Main Stream Media" handle this credible theory they so DENIED.
New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman on CNN;
"I think it is important to remember that part of the issue is when this was first being reported on and discussed back a few months after the pandemic had begun, was that then President Trump and Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, suggested they’ve seen evidence that this was formed in a lab and they also suggested that is was not released on purpose. But they refused to release the evidence showing what it was and so because of that made this instantly political," Haberman said.
In May 2020, Kessler (Washington Post Factchecker) said it was "virtually impossible" for the virus to originate from a lab. When Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., suggested the coronavirus was connected to research being done in Wuhan, China, the Washington Post said Cotton was pushing a "fringe theory."
Todd Zwillich, deputy Washington bureau chief for Vice News and former guest host for NPR’s 1A radio show, said Trump and conservative media weren’t discussing the lab leak hypothesis in "good faith."
Ohhhhhh, It's all Trump's fault that he was right and you all turned on him pedaling false information with no proof.
It was always from a lab. The real question is was it an accident or a targeted attack. And make no mistake, if it was an accident, and not biological warfare, we will see attacks like this in the future. We've given the chinese and russians a blueprint. This is the face of warfare in the new millennium. Germ warfare. Cyber warfare. With as much fear mongering that is done by media on both sides of the aisle, it is completely asinine that this very real threat isn't talked about more. I have been very vocal with my feelings about the Chinese government long before covid. They are not are friends. They intend to do us harm given the opportunity.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
1
@UNIMAN
It was always from a lab. The real question is was it an accident or a targeted attack. And make no mistake, if it was an accident, and not biological warfare, we will see attacks like this in the future. We've given the chinese and russians a blueprint. This is the face of warfare in the new millennium. Germ warfare. Cyber warfare. With as much fear mongering that is done by media on both sides of the aisle, it is completely asinine that this very real threat isn't talked about more. I have been very vocal with my feelings about the Chinese government long before covid. They are not are friends. They intend to do us harm given the opportunity.
Mr. Biden, who wants a report within 90 days, said that U.S. intelligence has focused on two scenarios—whether the coronavirus came from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident. He said that there is a divergence among officials in the American intelligence community, or IC, on how the virus might have emerged.
“While two elements in the IC lean toward the former scenario and one leans more toward the latter—each with low or moderate confidence—the majority of elements do not believe there is sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other,” Mr. Biden said in a statement Wednesday. He refrained from outlining the positions of specific intelligence agencies.
0
Mr. Biden, who wants a report within 90 days, said that U.S. intelligence has focused on two scenarios—whether the coronavirus came from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident. He said that there is a divergence among officials in the American intelligence community, or IC, on how the virus might have emerged.
“While two elements in the IC lean toward the former scenario and one leans more toward the latter—each with low or moderate confidence—the majority of elements do not believe there is sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other,” Mr. Biden said in a statement Wednesday. He refrained from outlining the positions of specific intelligence agencies.
Hot Forum Topics
