Exactly...but the few that only read articles and can't think beyond what they are having for lunch today are in that boat...there are a few in this forum and they slant more than an anviled forehead....
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
2
@BigGame90
Exactly...but the few that only read articles and can't think beyond what they are having for lunch today are in that boat...there are a few in this forum and they slant more than an anviled forehead....
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Biden administration announces $162 million to expand computer chip factories in Colorado and Oregon. Semi-conductors are a key component in many electronic goods. So greater US production can help to reduce supply problems and inflation. @thirdperson And more jobs as well! But reducing reliance on those key imports is the big key here!
more jobs
less reliance
thanks to president biden
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Biden administration announces $162 million to expand computer chip factories in Colorado and Oregon. Semi-conductors are a key component in many electronic goods. So greater US production can help to reduce supply problems and inflation. @thirdperson And more jobs as well! But reducing reliance on those key imports is the big key here!
Biden administration is proposing new rule requiring large banks to reduce overdraft fees to breakeven point. This could potentially save poor customers billions of dollars.
1
Biden administration is proposing new rule requiring large banks to reduce overdraft fees to breakeven point. This could potentially save poor customers billions of dollars.
That's it? Over draft fees? Proposing a new rule? Why stop at over draft fees? Why not tackle the highly overleverage problem almost all banks have? Gambling everything when rates were almost at 0%. Fed is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Raise rates, screw everyone but tame inflation. Lower rates, create more inflation. Keep rates the same, slowly crush everyone.
Credit card delinquencies hit record highs in Q3. Just wait till Q4 numbers come out after the "gift giving" season.
Large banks have much larger issues that will effect everyone, not just over draft fees.
Obviously I don't expect a reply from third since this poster is clearly a left leaning bot whom posts no insight of their own. Just copies and pasts while citing no sources. Pretty sure that's plagiarism.
1
@thirdperson
That's it? Over draft fees? Proposing a new rule? Why stop at over draft fees? Why not tackle the highly overleverage problem almost all banks have? Gambling everything when rates were almost at 0%. Fed is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Raise rates, screw everyone but tame inflation. Lower rates, create more inflation. Keep rates the same, slowly crush everyone.
Credit card delinquencies hit record highs in Q3. Just wait till Q4 numbers come out after the "gift giving" season.
Large banks have much larger issues that will effect everyone, not just over draft fees.
Obviously I don't expect a reply from third since this poster is clearly a left leaning bot whom posts no insight of their own. Just copies and pasts while citing no sources. Pretty sure that's plagiarism.
Biden administration is proposing new rule requiring large banks to reduce overdraft fees to breakeven point. This could potentially save poor customers billions of dollars.
@thirdperson
Biden Every little bit helps, especially when we all know for a FACT that the CHAOS party/CLOWN circus will automatically stand in the way of anything more substantial to help Americans.
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Biden administration is proposing new rule requiring large banks to reduce overdraft fees to breakeven point. This could potentially save poor customers billions of dollars.
@thirdperson
Biden Every little bit helps, especially when we all know for a FACT that the CHAOS party/CLOWN circus will automatically stand in the way of anything more substantial to help Americans.
The hill reveals that Biden administration is forgiving $4.9 billion in debt for 73,600 student borrowers. 44,000 are teachers, nurses, firefighters and others on Public service loan forgiveness program for 10 years. The rest has been on income repayment program for 20 years. So far, almost 3.7 million borrowers have been forgiven which is good for US economy. Polls show majority of Americans support student loan forgiveness.
0
The hill reveals that Biden administration is forgiving $4.9 billion in debt for 73,600 student borrowers. 44,000 are teachers, nurses, firefighters and others on Public service loan forgiveness program for 10 years. The rest has been on income repayment program for 20 years. So far, almost 3.7 million borrowers have been forgiven which is good for US economy. Polls show majority of Americans support student loan forgiveness.
The hill reveals that Biden administration is forgiving $4.9 billion in debt for 73,600 student borrowers. 44,000 are teachers, nurses, firefighters and others on Public service loan forgiveness program for 10 years. The rest has been on income repayment program for 20 years. So far, almost 3.7 million borrowers have been forgiven which is good for US economy. Polls show majority of Americans support student loan forgiveness.
So, is all this money being forgiven good for our national debt ? how many people " who don't owe" student debt actually support student loan forgiveness? And if students show an inability/ unwillingness to pay back student debt, why is this federal program allowed to continue ?
2
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
The hill reveals that Biden administration is forgiving $4.9 billion in debt for 73,600 student borrowers. 44,000 are teachers, nurses, firefighters and others on Public service loan forgiveness program for 10 years. The rest has been on income repayment program for 20 years. So far, almost 3.7 million borrowers have been forgiven which is good for US economy. Polls show majority of Americans support student loan forgiveness.
So, is all this money being forgiven good for our national debt ? how many people " who don't owe" student debt actually support student loan forgiveness? And if students show an inability/ unwillingness to pay back student debt, why is this federal program allowed to continue ?
The following very disconcerting information is not how you repair America!
We have another shocking development happening inside the United States Army. Our once proud Army is at it's tiniest force in 80 years! The biggest drop is Caucasians. In 2018 there were 42,000 Caucasian recruits. In 2023 this number fell dramatically to only 25,000! Why aren't Caucasians in America lining up in huge numbers at recruiting offices from the Atlantic to the Pacific Oceans to enlist in the Unites States Army? I will let the woke libs inside the politics forum of Covers answer this very uncomfortable but very important question. And we'll fight with all our might! As the Army goes rolling along!
1
The following very disconcerting information is not how you repair America!
We have another shocking development happening inside the United States Army. Our once proud Army is at it's tiniest force in 80 years! The biggest drop is Caucasians. In 2018 there were 42,000 Caucasian recruits. In 2023 this number fell dramatically to only 25,000! Why aren't Caucasians in America lining up in huge numbers at recruiting offices from the Atlantic to the Pacific Oceans to enlist in the Unites States Army? I will let the woke libs inside the politics forum of Covers answer this very uncomfortable but very important question. And we'll fight with all our might! As the Army goes rolling along!
I can think of many many more government freebies that I would want gone before student loan forgiveness. If it were structured properly that plan has great opportunity for a large impact and to educate citizens. It is near impossible to think that the government has the means to run any program with high efficiency and I mean any program this included but why are many ticked off about subsidizing higher ed? Most people do not know that the inflation rate on higher ed is crazy, it always is more costly and our programs to make it better for students are not at all thorough or comprehensive.
As Ive mentioned before, higher ed is too bloated, the general requirements are beyond pathetic, it should not be that a student spends two years of four doing generals and paying heavy costs for generals, its a time waste and a money hog. The un down here runs 12k a year plus fees and higher for their honors programs and that is without books or any living costs. So a four year student will run 50k plus unless you are working and pay as you go slower and then you take longer. How can we expect a young person be able to take 40-50-100-200-500k for a degree? I have a friend who had their son decide to attend John Hopkins and he is a sophomore there and their tuition costs will run over 250k, they sold their house and moved to where he is to make that possible for him.
Higher ed assistance is not a bad thing, but I would rather chop off 1-1.5 years of requirements and make subsidies for higher ed with public service or qualified public non-profit service based on a certain number of hours for a certain financial benefit.
I'd rather cut off foreign aid first and shore up other programs like corporate tax breaks than for student debt forgiveness to be lost.
0
@Rush51
I can think of many many more government freebies that I would want gone before student loan forgiveness. If it were structured properly that plan has great opportunity for a large impact and to educate citizens. It is near impossible to think that the government has the means to run any program with high efficiency and I mean any program this included but why are many ticked off about subsidizing higher ed? Most people do not know that the inflation rate on higher ed is crazy, it always is more costly and our programs to make it better for students are not at all thorough or comprehensive.
As Ive mentioned before, higher ed is too bloated, the general requirements are beyond pathetic, it should not be that a student spends two years of four doing generals and paying heavy costs for generals, its a time waste and a money hog. The un down here runs 12k a year plus fees and higher for their honors programs and that is without books or any living costs. So a four year student will run 50k plus unless you are working and pay as you go slower and then you take longer. How can we expect a young person be able to take 40-50-100-200-500k for a degree? I have a friend who had their son decide to attend John Hopkins and he is a sophomore there and their tuition costs will run over 250k, they sold their house and moved to where he is to make that possible for him.
Higher ed assistance is not a bad thing, but I would rather chop off 1-1.5 years of requirements and make subsidies for higher ed with public service or qualified public non-profit service based on a certain number of hours for a certain financial benefit.
I'd rather cut off foreign aid first and shore up other programs like corporate tax breaks than for student debt forgiveness to be lost.
Biden announces $5 billion for 37 infrastructure projects in at least 12 states. This long overdue investment repair and build bridges, highways, seaports and airports. Unlike Trump and other presidents who promise but didn't deliver to fix US infrastructure that has been crumbling for decades. Infrastructure is critical for the health and well being of the US.
1
Biden announces $5 billion for 37 infrastructure projects in at least 12 states. This long overdue investment repair and build bridges, highways, seaports and airports. Unlike Trump and other presidents who promise but didn't deliver to fix US infrastructure that has been crumbling for decades. Infrastructure is critical for the health and well being of the US.
People are not ticked off about subsidizing higher education. People are pissed that debt gets wiped away when a lot of students sacrificed to repay their debts, with interest or a lot of people had to pass on college so they didn't receive higher education because they saw the debt problem and were responsible with their finances before taking on massive debts that weren't guaranteed to land them a high paying job. The problem is, when student loans are federally backed and guaranteed, colleges and universities are going to jack costs up because the loans are guaranteed and that ultimately falls back on the students to repay. When inflation far outpaces wage increases, there will be major issues. It's not rocket science to figure that out. Same with inflation, when the fed prints trillions, prices on everything will go up. The real issue is the interest rates on these student loans and the willingness to hand out loans like candy in a school yard. If higher education is going to benefit the country and world as a whole, loans shouldn't be incentivized to make large profits and schools shouldn't get greedy with jacking costs through the roof. Why are students paying off loans from 20 years ago? That's the real problem.
As for the general requirements in college, students don't need to take those classes at expensive schools and get in massive debts to get their general studies finished at a prestigious school. They can go to JuCo to take those classes and get them out of the way early on so they can focus on their majors after getting through the general classes. That would also give students ~2 years to dial in their major. Lets be real, most 18 year old's going into college have no clue what they want to do with the rest of their lives and shouldn't be making major decisions like declaring a major right out of high school and taking on massive loans only to change their major after their second year.
Banks and schools got greedy and took advantage of young students while pushing high school students to attend college because that's how life is supposed to work. When you and your buddies are the ones benefiting from loans and high interest, you'll sell anything to push more loans. Once those loans go out, banks just use that paper as collateral to loan more money out and the cycle repeats until defaults wreck havoc or the money printer goes into overdrive which ultimately costs tax payers.
0
@wallstreetcappers
People are not ticked off about subsidizing higher education. People are pissed that debt gets wiped away when a lot of students sacrificed to repay their debts, with interest or a lot of people had to pass on college so they didn't receive higher education because they saw the debt problem and were responsible with their finances before taking on massive debts that weren't guaranteed to land them a high paying job. The problem is, when student loans are federally backed and guaranteed, colleges and universities are going to jack costs up because the loans are guaranteed and that ultimately falls back on the students to repay. When inflation far outpaces wage increases, there will be major issues. It's not rocket science to figure that out. Same with inflation, when the fed prints trillions, prices on everything will go up. The real issue is the interest rates on these student loans and the willingness to hand out loans like candy in a school yard. If higher education is going to benefit the country and world as a whole, loans shouldn't be incentivized to make large profits and schools shouldn't get greedy with jacking costs through the roof. Why are students paying off loans from 20 years ago? That's the real problem.
As for the general requirements in college, students don't need to take those classes at expensive schools and get in massive debts to get their general studies finished at a prestigious school. They can go to JuCo to take those classes and get them out of the way early on so they can focus on their majors after getting through the general classes. That would also give students ~2 years to dial in their major. Lets be real, most 18 year old's going into college have no clue what they want to do with the rest of their lives and shouldn't be making major decisions like declaring a major right out of high school and taking on massive loans only to change their major after their second year.
Banks and schools got greedy and took advantage of young students while pushing high school students to attend college because that's how life is supposed to work. When you and your buddies are the ones benefiting from loans and high interest, you'll sell anything to push more loans. Once those loans go out, banks just use that paper as collateral to loan more money out and the cycle repeats until defaults wreck havoc or the money printer goes into overdrive which ultimately costs tax payers.
(Reuters) - The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for solar energy projects on federal lands that identifies 22 million acres in 11 western states best suited for development.
The announcement is part of the Interior Department's push to site more renewable energy facilities on federal lands, a cornerstone of President Joe Biden's goal to decarbonize the U.S. electricity grid by 2035 and combat climate change.
The draft plan published on Wednesday would update an Obama-era policy that established special zones for solar projects in six states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah.
1
Helping Americans!
(Reuters) - The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for solar energy projects on federal lands that identifies 22 million acres in 11 western states best suited for development.
The announcement is part of the Interior Department's push to site more renewable energy facilities on federal lands, a cornerstone of President Joe Biden's goal to decarbonize the U.S. electricity grid by 2035 and combat climate change.
The draft plan published on Wednesday would update an Obama-era policy that established special zones for solar projects in six states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah.
(Reuters) - The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for solar energy projects on federal lands that identifies 22 million acres in 11 western states best suited for development. The announcement is part of the Interior Department's push to site more renewable energy facilities on federal lands, a cornerstone of President Joe Biden's goal to decarbonize the U.S. electricity grid by 2035 and combat climate change. The draft plan published on Wednesday would update an Obama-era policy that established special zones for solar projects in six states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah.
Separately, Interior said it had taken steps toward approval of six solar projects and a transmission line in Nevada, California and Arizona. BLM has approved 47 clean energy projects, enough to power more than 3.5 million homes, during the Biden administration.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Helping Americans!
(Reuters) - The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for solar energy projects on federal lands that identifies 22 million acres in 11 western states best suited for development. The announcement is part of the Interior Department's push to site more renewable energy facilities on federal lands, a cornerstone of President Joe Biden's goal to decarbonize the U.S. electricity grid by 2035 and combat climate change. The draft plan published on Wednesday would update an Obama-era policy that established special zones for solar projects in six states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah.
Separately, Interior said it had taken steps toward approval of six solar projects and a transmission line in Nevada, California and Arizona. BLM has approved 47 clean energy projects, enough to power more than 3.5 million homes, during the Biden administration.
(much thanks to @zeus4par for being first to report on this excellent news!)
Jobs, jobs, jobs! Bidenomics!
Data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics pegged US job growth at 353,000 jobs in January, a stunning figure that doubled economists’ projections!
The unemployment rate held at 3.7% and has now been under 4% for two full years!
2
HEADLINES today . . .
(much thanks to @zeus4par for being first to report on this excellent news!)
Jobs, jobs, jobs! Bidenomics!
Data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics pegged US job growth at 353,000 jobs in January, a stunning figure that doubled economists’ projections!
The unemployment rate held at 3.7% and has now been under 4% for two full years!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Helping Americans! (Reuters) - The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for solar energy projects on federal lands that identifies 22 million acres in 11 western states best suited for development. The announcement is part of the Interior Department's push to site more renewable energy facilities on federal lands, a cornerstone of President Joe Biden's goal to decarbonize the U.S. electricity grid by 2035 and combat climate change. The draft plan published on Wednesday would update an Obama-era policy that established special zones for solar projects in six states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. Separately, Interior said it had taken steps toward approval of six solar projects and a transmission line in Nevada, California and Arizona. BLM has approved 47 clean energy projects, enough to power more than 3.5 million homes, during the Biden administration.
it all helps even if just a small percentage of our pop.
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Helping Americans! (Reuters) - The Biden administration on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for solar energy projects on federal lands that identifies 22 million acres in 11 western states best suited for development. The announcement is part of the Interior Department's push to site more renewable energy facilities on federal lands, a cornerstone of President Joe Biden's goal to decarbonize the U.S. electricity grid by 2035 and combat climate change. The draft plan published on Wednesday would update an Obama-era policy that established special zones for solar projects in six states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. Separately, Interior said it had taken steps toward approval of six solar projects and a transmission line in Nevada, California and Arizona. BLM has approved 47 clean energy projects, enough to power more than 3.5 million homes, during the Biden administration.
it all helps even if just a small percentage of our pop.
@wallstreetcappers People are not ticked off about subsidizing higher education. People are pissed that debt gets wiped away when a lot of students sacrificed to repay their debts, with interest or a lot of people had to pass on college so they didn't receive higher education because they saw the debt problem and were responsible with their finances before taking on massive debts that weren't guaranteed to land them a high paying job. The problem is, when student loans are federally backed and guaranteed, colleges and universities are going to jack costs up because the loans are guaranteed and that ultimately falls back on the students to repay. When inflation far outpaces wage increases, there will be major issues. It's not rocket science to figure that out. Same with inflation, when the fed prints trillions, prices on everything will go up. The real issue is the interest rates on these student loans and the willingness to hand out loans like candy in a school yard. If higher education is going to benefit the country and world as a whole, loans shouldn't be incentivized to make large profits and schools shouldn't get greedy with jacking costs through the roof. Why are students paying off loans from 20 years ago? That's the real problem. As for the general requirements in college, students don't need to take those classes at expensive schools and get in massive debts to get their general studies finished at a prestigious school. They can go to JuCo to take those classes and get them out of the way early on so they can focus on their majors after getting through the general classes. That would also give students ~2 years to dial in their major. Lets be real, most 18 year old's going into college have no clue what they want to do with the rest of their lives and shouldn't be making major decisions like declaring a major right out of high school and taking on massive loans only to change their major after their second year. Banks and schools got greedy and took advantage of young students while pushing high school students to attend college because that's how life is supposed to work. When you and your buddies are the ones benefiting from loans and high interest, you'll sell anything to push more loans. Once those loans go out, banks just use that paper as collateral to loan more money out and the cycle repeats until defaults wreck havoc or the money printer goes into overdrive which ultimately costs tax payers.
Very sound...kudos...great post
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
@wallstreetcappers People are not ticked off about subsidizing higher education. People are pissed that debt gets wiped away when a lot of students sacrificed to repay their debts, with interest or a lot of people had to pass on college so they didn't receive higher education because they saw the debt problem and were responsible with their finances before taking on massive debts that weren't guaranteed to land them a high paying job. The problem is, when student loans are federally backed and guaranteed, colleges and universities are going to jack costs up because the loans are guaranteed and that ultimately falls back on the students to repay. When inflation far outpaces wage increases, there will be major issues. It's not rocket science to figure that out. Same with inflation, when the fed prints trillions, prices on everything will go up. The real issue is the interest rates on these student loans and the willingness to hand out loans like candy in a school yard. If higher education is going to benefit the country and world as a whole, loans shouldn't be incentivized to make large profits and schools shouldn't get greedy with jacking costs through the roof. Why are students paying off loans from 20 years ago? That's the real problem. As for the general requirements in college, students don't need to take those classes at expensive schools and get in massive debts to get their general studies finished at a prestigious school. They can go to JuCo to take those classes and get them out of the way early on so they can focus on their majors after getting through the general classes. That would also give students ~2 years to dial in their major. Lets be real, most 18 year old's going into college have no clue what they want to do with the rest of their lives and shouldn't be making major decisions like declaring a major right out of high school and taking on massive loans only to change their major after their second year. Banks and schools got greedy and took advantage of young students while pushing high school students to attend college because that's how life is supposed to work. When you and your buddies are the ones benefiting from loans and high interest, you'll sell anything to push more loans. Once those loans go out, banks just use that paper as collateral to loan more money out and the cycle repeats until defaults wreck havoc or the money printer goes into overdrive which ultimately costs tax payers.
The strength in the job market is powering a “virtuous cycle” in the economy, Bernstein said, noting that consumer spending makes up 70% of GDP.
The thinking is that as long as consumers have jobs, and paychecks are beating inflation, Americans can keep shopping. And that in turn should create new jobs, and growth!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
.
cont . . .
The strength in the job market is powering a “virtuous cycle” in the economy, Bernstein said, noting that consumer spending makes up 70% of GDP.
The thinking is that as long as consumers have jobs, and paychecks are beating inflation, Americans can keep shopping. And that in turn should create new jobs, and growth!
the FED raised rates and that drastically increased interest cost and since we are not running at a surplus that interest increases the deficit. No way around it. and that has ZERO to do with Biden, in fact if anything it hides the fake Trump numbers. He had much lower rates for most all his term and that hid the deficit impact if rates were normalized. you cannot say that it is Biden's fault that Russia had the issues or that Trump would have stopped it, that is nonsense! And just do not throw that mud on the wall it is such a bad fallback. Trump had a teeny bit of Covid impact, but Biden had supply chain inflation where Trump did not because corps had excess inventories for a solid year after Covid hit and once those inventories dried up the impact of current supply chain and labor shortages hit. The only way you can draw an equal comparison is if both had equal variables. But neither did
EXACTAMUNDOS! Trump inherited a humming economy from Obama/Biden with below mean avg unemployment rates, while Biden inherited a disaster from trump with millions out of work and a reeling economy. Variables not equal.
1
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
the FED raised rates and that drastically increased interest cost and since we are not running at a surplus that interest increases the deficit. No way around it. and that has ZERO to do with Biden, in fact if anything it hides the fake Trump numbers. He had much lower rates for most all his term and that hid the deficit impact if rates were normalized. you cannot say that it is Biden's fault that Russia had the issues or that Trump would have stopped it, that is nonsense! And just do not throw that mud on the wall it is such a bad fallback. Trump had a teeny bit of Covid impact, but Biden had supply chain inflation where Trump did not because corps had excess inventories for a solid year after Covid hit and once those inventories dried up the impact of current supply chain and labor shortages hit. The only way you can draw an equal comparison is if both had equal variables. But neither did
EXACTAMUNDOS! Trump inherited a humming economy from Obama/Biden with below mean avg unemployment rates, while Biden inherited a disaster from trump with millions out of work and a reeling economy. Variables not equal.
(much thanks to @zeus4par for being first to report on this excellent news!)
Jobs, jobs, jobs! Bidenomics!
Data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics pegged US job growth at 353,000 jobs in January, a stunning figure that doubled economists’ projections!
The unemployment rate held at 3.7% and has now been under 4% for two full years!
President Joe Biden’s key economic plan — known widely as Bidenomics — is centered on the pillars of public investment, empowering middle-class workers, and promoting business competition.
This approach is positioned in direct opposition to the failed "trickle-down economic theory," which holds that cutting taxes for wealthy individuals and corporations should result in some benefits for others down the food chain.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
HEADLINES today . . .
(much thanks to @zeus4par for being first to report on this excellent news!)
Jobs, jobs, jobs! Bidenomics!
Data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics pegged US job growth at 353,000 jobs in January, a stunning figure that doubled economists’ projections!
The unemployment rate held at 3.7% and has now been under 4% for two full years!
President Joe Biden’s key economic plan — known widely as Bidenomics — is centered on the pillars of public investment, empowering middle-class workers, and promoting business competition.
This approach is positioned in direct opposition to the failed "trickle-down economic theory," which holds that cutting taxes for wealthy individuals and corporations should result in some benefits for others down the food chain.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.