@Raiders22 What makes you think my opinion is that far from fact? I can assure you that my opinions will never be as off target as to sue me for 765 million like Fox News ! What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of "No!" spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of "No!" tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain.
@joe pockets
THAT understanding is very common among those who DO NOT use FOX NEWS as their main source of information!
3
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:
@Raiders22 What makes you think my opinion is that far from fact? I can assure you that my opinions will never be as off target as to sue me for 765 million like Fox News ! What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of "No!" spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of "No!" tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain.
@joe pockets
THAT understanding is very common among those who DO NOT use FOX NEWS as their main source of information!
What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain.
Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects.
3
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:
What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain.
Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects.
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain. Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects.
distant ones ya
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain. Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain. Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects. distant ones ya
not the last one
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain. Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects. distant ones ya
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain. Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects. distant ones ya not the last one
Definitely NOT the last republican admin, no.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets: What I’m trying to convey is that the Party of No spends as much if not more than the party of Yes. When the party of Yes spends money more often than not it tends to help folks who direly need it, where as the respite ants of money from the party of No tend to not need the money or tax break in the first place! My last name is Pockets ! Not Hannity,Carlson or Dobbs ! So get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. M Twain. Good point. Distant republican admins have tried to help at least a little. Certainly not the most recent one, which was a failure in most respects. distant ones ya not the last one
House Republican Rep. Brandon Williams said that the current chaos in the House hurts the GOP brand
“It hurts the whole Republican brand, whether it’s in a swing district or not! And the American people want confidence that we will govern, that we have responsible people to govern,” he told CNN’s Manu Raju.
2
House Republican Rep. Brandon Williams said that the current chaos in the House hurts the GOP brand
“It hurts the whole Republican brand, whether it’s in a swing district or not! And the American people want confidence that we will govern, that we have responsible people to govern,” he told CNN’s Manu Raju.
Mitt Romney criticizes Fox News - and right-wing media - for warping Republican Party
CNN —
Mitt Romney, once the Republican Party’s standard-bearer, says the right-wing media machine is at fault for much of the radicalization that has disfigured the GOP!
The Utah senator and one-time GOP presidential nominee unleashed a torrent of valid criticism aimed squarely at the information universe in which most of his party’s members consume their news, characterizing it in a new book as a: "dangerous propaganda factory detached from reality, poisoning the minds of its inhabitants."
Mitt
3
Mitt Romney criticizes Fox News - and right-wing media - for warping Republican Party
CNN —
Mitt Romney, once the Republican Party’s standard-bearer, says the right-wing media machine is at fault for much of the radicalization that has disfigured the GOP!
The Utah senator and one-time GOP presidential nominee unleashed a torrent of valid criticism aimed squarely at the information universe in which most of his party’s members consume their news, characterizing it in a new book as a: "dangerous propaganda factory detached from reality, poisoning the minds of its inhabitants."
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Wallstreetcapper is right. Trump was lucky to inherit a strong economy from Obama. ISIS was defeated during Obama administration to allow Trump to later claim victory. Trump's trade war failed to change China's unfair practices while American consumers and US businesses ended up paying higher prices. Trump's unnecessary tax cuts failed to pay for themselves but instead worsen budget deficits and federal debt.
@thirdperson
After accepting a humming economy from Obama (rated #11 best US president all-time by highly-respected/comprehensive surveys by experts), on his watch, the multiple indicted GOP RICO mob boss/fraud/sex-offender was also responsible for a crushing recession; FAILED to do the one thing most important to any US presidency - PROTECT THE COUNTRY! - setting in motion conditions leading directly to the deaths of over ONE MILLION Americans from a killer virus; stood by while over 20 million Americans were thrown out of work leadiing DIRECTLY to unprecedented financial hardship to much of the country and many millions of citizens and businesses; oversaw a spike in unemployment of over 14% - the worst since the Great Depression preceeding WW2; the only modern day US president to actually take a good economy and good unemployment numbers (from a Democrat) then leave the office in disgrace with a WORSE economy and BAD unemployment numbers....handing the task to fix HIS mess back to the Democrats.......again!; called our fallen soldiers "losers" and "suckers"; then incited and presided over one of the most heinous acts in our Republic by actually attempting a coup to overthrow a democratically elected US government - a criminal act leading to his arrest on multiple felonies, which also include multiple trials for fraud and sex crimes.
On a sports-gambling forum of all places, the INTELLIGENT among us fully understand that the outcome of and final assessment of the coaching & performances in a football game is NOT determined by the score at the end of the 3rd Q (ie, first 3 yrs in office), but rather, the score/outcome at the full conclusion of the game.
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Wallstreetcapper is right. Trump was lucky to inherit a strong economy from Obama. ISIS was defeated during Obama administration to allow Trump to later claim victory. Trump's trade war failed to change China's unfair practices while American consumers and US businesses ended up paying higher prices. Trump's unnecessary tax cuts failed to pay for themselves but instead worsen budget deficits and federal debt.
@thirdperson
After accepting a humming economy from Obama (rated #11 best US president all-time by highly-respected/comprehensive surveys by experts), on his watch, the multiple indicted GOP RICO mob boss/fraud/sex-offender was also responsible for a crushing recession; FAILED to do the one thing most important to any US presidency - PROTECT THE COUNTRY! - setting in motion conditions leading directly to the deaths of over ONE MILLION Americans from a killer virus; stood by while over 20 million Americans were thrown out of work leadiing DIRECTLY to unprecedented financial hardship to much of the country and many millions of citizens and businesses; oversaw a spike in unemployment of over 14% - the worst since the Great Depression preceeding WW2; the only modern day US president to actually take a good economy and good unemployment numbers (from a Democrat) then leave the office in disgrace with a WORSE economy and BAD unemployment numbers....handing the task to fix HIS mess back to the Democrats.......again!; called our fallen soldiers "losers" and "suckers"; then incited and presided over one of the most heinous acts in our Republic by actually attempting a coup to overthrow a democratically elected US government - a criminal act leading to his arrest on multiple felonies, which also include multiple trials for fraud and sex crimes.
On a sports-gambling forum of all places, the INTELLIGENT among us fully understand that the outcome of and final assessment of the coaching & performances in a football game is NOT determined by the score at the end of the 3rd Q (ie, first 3 yrs in office), but rather, the score/outcome at the full conclusion of the game.
USA TODAY- Liz Cheney called new House Speaker Mike Johnson "dangerous" because he supported overturning the results of the 2020 election.
"He was willing to set aside what he knew to be the rulings of the courts, the requirements of the Constitution, in order to placate Donald Trump," she told University of Virginia Center for Politics director Larry Sabato on the "Politics is Everything" podcast Wednesday.
"He was acting in ways that he knew to be wrong," she said. "I think that the country unfortunately will come to see the measure of his character."
2
Election denier elected
Liz Cheney says new Speaker Mike Johnson
is a 'dangerous' person to lead the House
USA TODAY- Liz Cheney called new House Speaker Mike Johnson "dangerous" because he supported overturning the results of the 2020 election.
"He was willing to set aside what he knew to be the rulings of the courts, the requirements of the Constitution, in order to placate Donald Trump," she told University of Virginia Center for Politics director Larry Sabato on the "Politics is Everything" podcast Wednesday.
"He was acting in ways that he knew to be wrong," she said. "I think that the country unfortunately will come to see the measure of his character."
Liz Cheney called new House Speaker Mike Johnson "dangerous" because he supported overturning the results of the 2020 election.
US supreme court debunked Johnson's argument against certifying 2020 election. He claimed that only state legislatures have authority to set election rules. Not election officials, governors, courts or secretaries of state. Actually, they are allowed to change election rules to improve access to voting during pandemic.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Liz Cheney called new House Speaker Mike Johnson "dangerous" because he supported overturning the results of the 2020 election.
US supreme court debunked Johnson's argument against certifying 2020 election. He claimed that only state legislatures have authority to set election rules. Not election officials, governors, courts or secretaries of state. Actually, they are allowed to change election rules to improve access to voting during pandemic.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Trump Calls to Defund the Police After His Own ArrestThe disgraced former President demanded his fascist Republican accomplices in Congress defund the FBI and the Justice Department.
trump's plan appears to be to competely eliminate those two institutions (who dared investigate and arrest him for his crimes) and replace both with just one: a much better, more disciplined force which would be aptly named the "Brown Shirts"
1
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Trump Calls to Defund the Police After His Own ArrestThe disgraced former President demanded his fascist Republican accomplices in Congress defund the FBI and the Justice Department.
trump's plan appears to be to competely eliminate those two institutions (who dared investigate and arrest him for his crimes) and replace both with just one: a much better, more disciplined force which would be aptly named the "Brown Shirts"
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Liz Cheney called new House Speaker Mike Johnson "dangerous" because he supported overturning the results of the 2020 election. US supreme court debunked Johnson's argument against certifying 2020 election. He claimed that only state legislatures have authority to set election rules. Not election officials, governors, courts or secretaries of state. Actually, they are allowed to change election rules to improve access to voting during pandemic.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Liz Cheney called new House Speaker Mike Johnson "dangerous" because he supported overturning the results of the 2020 election. US supreme court debunked Johnson's argument against certifying 2020 election. He claimed that only state legislatures have authority to set election rules. Not election officials, governors, courts or secretaries of state. Actually, they are allowed to change election rules to improve access to voting during pandemic.
Trump is winning in polls of 5 of 6 swing states, and don't forget, when RFK jr. runs as an independent, he will siphon even more votes from Biden.
It's hard to see things getting for Joe anytime soon. War is raging on 2 fronts under his watch, inflation is killing consumers, and we haven't even entered recession yet.... that will be the final nail in the Biden coffin.
1
Trump is winning in polls of 5 of 6 swing states, and don't forget, when RFK jr. runs as an independent, he will siphon even more votes from Biden.
It's hard to see things getting for Joe anytime soon. War is raging on 2 fronts under his watch, inflation is killing consumers, and we haven't even entered recession yet.... that will be the final nail in the Biden coffin.
trump's plan appears to be to competely eliminate those two institutions (who dared investigate and arrest him for his crimes) and replace both with just one: a much better, more disciplined force which would be aptly named the "Brown Shirts"
That's the truth if you can take it!
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
trump's plan appears to be to competely eliminate those two institutions (who dared investigate and arrest him for his crimes) and replace both with just one: a much better, more disciplined force which would be aptly named the "Brown Shirts"
Also, I find it typical that you didn't even respond to my posts about the dreadful Biden... the POS, and worst president this country has ever seen. Carter can feel relieved from this POS...
0
Also, I find it typical that you didn't even respond to my posts about the dreadful Biden... the POS, and worst president this country has ever seen. Carter can feel relieved from this POS...
trump's plan appears to be to competely eliminate those two institutions (who dared investigate and arrest him for his crimes) and replace both with just one: a much better, more disciplined force which would be aptly named the "Brown Shirts"
It really makes sense too since the brown shirts are synonymous with fascism
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
trump's plan appears to be to competely eliminate those two institutions (who dared investigate and arrest him for his crimes) and replace both with just one: a much better, more disciplined force which would be aptly named the "Brown Shirts"
It really makes sense too since the brown shirts are synonymous with fascism
Marjorie Taylor Greene said today that "republican voters are sick and tired of the republican politicians" Those of us who watch the chaos party & clown circus with amusement are in agreement
WHAT????
She said that!?!
1
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Marjorie Taylor Greene said today that "republican voters are sick and tired of the republican politicians" Those of us who watch the chaos party & clown circus with amusement are in agreement
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.