Why have a military then? By the way. Obama isn't just a coward, he is a vagina.
He should have never drew a line in the sand if he didn't intend to back it up. What do you have to say about that?
You gonna try tell me that line in sand was fake news?
Before you make any comments, you better get your facts straight.
one major difference between Trump's strikes against the Assad regime and Obama's ISIS airstrikes is the legal authorization for carrying them out.
When Obama considered launching airstrikes in Syria against 2013 in response to the chemical attacks, he decided to go to Congress before striking, and the resistance he faced there convinced the president not to hit Assad.
Obama stated that he was comfortable going forward without U.N. Security Council approval.
When Obam a ordered the US military to attack Libya to get rid of Ghaddafi, a lot of right-wingres said it was unconstitutional because Congress did not approve it
Was the Republican-led congress a coward and a vagina ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wordsmyth:
Why have a military then? By the way. Obama isn't just a coward, he is a vagina.
He should have never drew a line in the sand if he didn't intend to back it up. What do you have to say about that?
You gonna try tell me that line in sand was fake news?
Before you make any comments, you better get your facts straight.
one major difference between Trump's strikes against the Assad regime and Obama's ISIS airstrikes is the legal authorization for carrying them out.
When Obama considered launching airstrikes in Syria against 2013 in response to the chemical attacks, he decided to go to Congress before striking, and the resistance he faced there convinced the president not to hit Assad.
Obama stated that he was comfortable going forward without U.N. Security Council approval.
When Obam a ordered the US military to attack Libya to get rid of Ghaddafi, a lot of right-wingres said it was unconstitutional because Congress did not approve it
Was the Republican-led congress a coward and a vagina ?
Give the credit to Pres. Trump for attacking Assad, Assad is a murderer he single handed murders over 400,000 of his own people. And the uses of mass destruction weapons signal his demise eventually, both our allies UK and Australia concur the US's strike against Assad.
0
Give the credit to Pres. Trump for attacking Assad, Assad is a murderer he single handed murders over 400,000 of his own people. And the uses of mass destruction weapons signal his demise eventually, both our allies UK and Australia concur the US's strike against Assad.
Without Congress Congress has not declared war since www2 . hard to belie e that this is now an issue.
But according to the constitution trump can bomb at will till July without Congress.
War Powers Resolution (WPR) or War Powers Act give the president of the United States the authority to use force without congress declaration of war or specific statutory authorization only in the case of a national emergency (attack on the United States, its territories, allies , armed forces)
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
President can conduct war for 90 days.
Without Congress Congress has not declared war since www2 . hard to belie e that this is now an issue.
But according to the constitution trump can bomb at will till July without Congress.
War Powers Resolution (WPR) or War Powers Act give the president of the United States the authority to use force without congress declaration of war or specific statutory authorization only in the case of a national emergency (attack on the United States, its territories, allies , armed forces)
Trump has international support for the strikes, those voicing objection are the predictable/usual suspects, russia and the left.
Trump was given 2 options by his advisors, precision strikes on military targets or a dance protest outside syrian embassy.
I think he made the right choice.
Get your facts straight
"While we all condemn the atrocities in Syria, the United States was not attacked. The President needs Congressional authorization for military action as required by the Constitution. Our prior interventions in this region have done nothing to make us safer and Syria will be no different,"
Republican Senator Rand Paul
Trump in 2013
The President must get congressional approval before attacking Syria - Big mistake IF he does not !
Republican Robert Aderholt and Pete Olson were against Obama in 2013 now approve of Trump's action
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
Trump has international support for the strikes, those voicing objection are the predictable/usual suspects, russia and the left.
Trump was given 2 options by his advisors, precision strikes on military targets or a dance protest outside syrian embassy.
I think he made the right choice.
Get your facts straight
"While we all condemn the atrocities in Syria, the United States was not attacked. The President needs Congressional authorization for military action as required by the Constitution. Our prior interventions in this region have done nothing to make us safer and Syria will be no different,"
Republican Senator Rand Paul
Trump in 2013
The President must get congressional approval before attacking Syria - Big mistake IF he does not !
Republican Robert Aderholt and Pete Olson were against Obama in 2013 now approve of Trump's action
Before you make any comments, you better get your facts straight.
one major difference between Trump's strikes against the Assad regime and Obama's ISIS airstrikes is the legal authorization for carrying them out.
When Obama considered launching airstrikes in Syria against 2013 in response to the chemical attacks, he decided to go to Congress before striking, and the resistance he faced there convinced the president not to hit Assad.
Obama stated that he was comfortable going forward without U.N. Security Council approval.
When Obam a ordered the US military to attack Libya to get rid of Ghaddafi, a lot of right-wingres said it was unconstitutional because Congress did not approve it
Was the Republican-led congress a coward and a vagina ?
The point is still the same, regardless. Why would Obama open his pie hole and draw a line if he had any chance of walking it back for any reason?
0
Quote Originally Posted by ilsp2003:
Before you make any comments, you better get your facts straight.
one major difference between Trump's strikes against the Assad regime and Obama's ISIS airstrikes is the legal authorization for carrying them out.
When Obama considered launching airstrikes in Syria against 2013 in response to the chemical attacks, he decided to go to Congress before striking, and the resistance he faced there convinced the president not to hit Assad.
Obama stated that he was comfortable going forward without U.N. Security Council approval.
When Obam a ordered the US military to attack Libya to get rid of Ghaddafi, a lot of right-wingres said it was unconstitutional because Congress did not approve it
Was the Republican-led congress a coward and a vagina ?
The point is still the same, regardless. Why would Obama open his pie hole and draw a line if he had any chance of walking it back for any reason?
"While we all condemn the atrocities in Syria, the United States was not attacked. The President needs Congressional authorization for military action as required by the Constitution. Our prior interventions in this region have done nothing to make us safer and Syria will be no different,"
Republican Senator Rand Paul
Trump in 2013
The President must get congressional approval before attacking Syria - Big mistake IF he does not !
Republican Robert Aderholt and Pete Olson were against Obama in 2013 now approve of Trump's action
i have my facts straight, enjoy the protest.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ilsp2003:
Get your facts straight
"While we all condemn the atrocities in Syria, the United States was not attacked. The President needs Congressional authorization for military action as required by the Constitution. Our prior interventions in this region have done nothing to make us safer and Syria will be no different,"
Republican Senator Rand Paul
Trump in 2013
The President must get congressional approval before attacking Syria - Big mistake IF he does not !
Republican Robert Aderholt and Pete Olson were against Obama in 2013 now approve of Trump's action
the question is who exactly are we supporting? Isis is fighting Assad and we just bombed the pissss out of him?? was this just a message to the rest of the world? was this a slap to the face of the media that Trump and Russia are not in bed together? Was this to boost his ratings?
these are good questions along with what bws mentioned: trump basically told these syrian kids to f*ck off when we knew they were fleeing chemical and other terrorist attacks and now trump cares enough to basically attack the country without consulting congress? why?
i may have found the answer. i'll let this guy explain it.
the question is who exactly are we supporting? Isis is fighting Assad and we just bombed the pissss out of him?? was this just a message to the rest of the world? was this a slap to the face of the media that Trump and Russia are not in bed together? Was this to boost his ratings?
these are good questions along with what bws mentioned: trump basically told these syrian kids to f*ck off when we knew they were fleeing chemical and other terrorist attacks and now trump cares enough to basically attack the country without consulting congress? why?
i may have found the answer. i'll let this guy explain it.
The anti trump anti white men anti immigration pro lbgt pink hat a day without women black lives matter and all the endless do nothing protests you and your ilk occupy your time with.
Those protests .
Stick to the protests, the big boys are handling things now.
0
The anti trump anti white men anti immigration pro lbgt pink hat a day without women black lives matter and all the endless do nothing protests you and your ilk occupy your time with.
Those protests .
Stick to the protests, the big boys are handling things now.
The anti trump anti white men anti immigration pro lbgt pink hat a day without women black lives matter and all the endless do nothing protests you and your ilk occupy your time with.
Those protests .
Stick to the protests, the big boys are handling things now.
Dude you're really annoying
U.S should have attacked Syria back in 2013 and Assad should have been removed from power.
Stop making it a partisan issue. Republicans who oppose Obama in 2013 are the same ones cheering for Trump.
is Destroying one airfield enough ?
what's next ?
Sooner or later Congress needs to get involved IF Trump has a long term strategy
Russia pledges to boost Syria defenses
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
The anti trump anti white men anti immigration pro lbgt pink hat a day without women black lives matter and all the endless do nothing protests you and your ilk occupy your time with.
Those protests .
Stick to the protests, the big boys are handling things now.
Dude you're really annoying
U.S should have attacked Syria back in 2013 and Assad should have been removed from power.
Stop making it a partisan issue. Republicans who oppose Obama in 2013 are the same ones cheering for Trump.
is Destroying one airfield enough ?
what's next ?
Sooner or later Congress needs to get involved IF Trump has a long term strategy
these are good questions along with what bws mentioned: trump basically told these syrian kids to f*ck off when we knew they were fleeing chemical and other terrorist attacks and now trump cares enough to basically attack the country without consulting congress? why?
i may have found the answer. i'll let this guy explain it.
Trump was against attacking Syria back in 2013 when Assad used chemical weapons
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
these are good questions along with what bws mentioned: trump basically told these syrian kids to f*ck off when we knew they were fleeing chemical and other terrorist attacks and now trump cares enough to basically attack the country without consulting congress? why?
i may have found the answer. i'll let this guy explain it.
Might as well wish god be on earth than congress actually passes a balanced budget that the CBO and ways amd eans committee actually affis that it will be balanced
0
Might as well wish god be on earth than congress actually passes a balanced budget that the CBO and ways amd eans committee actually affis that it will be balanced
I don't know how much damage was done but the Russians are supposed to have S300 and S400 anti-aircraft missile systems and they could not stop the Tomahawk missiles.
0
I don't know how much damage was done but the Russians are supposed to have S300 and S400 anti-aircraft missile systems and they could not stop the Tomahawk missiles.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.