Donald Trump continued his pre-election economic event tour on Tuesday with a lengthy interview with Bloomberg at the Economic Club of Chicago. It was a total mess,” Rolling Stone reports. “Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait did not take it easy on Trump, and it quickly became clear that the former president has no conception of the mechanics of or the potential ramifications of the economic platform he’s running on. Bluntly, the former president was incoherent [emphasis mine] when pressed with real questions about his policies.” David Graham: “When he speaks about the economy, he sounds like a child—which might be the source of his appeal.” https://politicalwire.com/2024/10/15/trump-crumbles-when-pressed-on-economic-policy/#disqus_thread
******* "Incoherent" ain't exactly Presidential material, but it's what is reasonable to expect from "Mr. Bankruptcies." Virtually all economists - liberal, moderate or conservative - say his emphasis on tariffs is a huge mistake.
it was incoherent at best
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Donald Trump continued his pre-election economic event tour on Tuesday with a lengthy interview with Bloomberg at the Economic Club of Chicago. It was a total mess,” Rolling Stone reports. “Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait did not take it easy on Trump, and it quickly became clear that the former president has no conception of the mechanics of or the potential ramifications of the economic platform he’s running on. Bluntly, the former president was incoherent [emphasis mine] when pressed with real questions about his policies.” David Graham: “When he speaks about the economy, he sounds like a child—which might be the source of his appeal.” https://politicalwire.com/2024/10/15/trump-crumbles-when-pressed-on-economic-policy/#disqus_thread
******* "Incoherent" ain't exactly Presidential material, but it's what is reasonable to expect from "Mr. Bankruptcies." Virtually all economists - liberal, moderate or conservative - say his emphasis on tariffs is a huge mistake.
@THEMUGG Lost words...you have been generalized and categorized on the spreadsheet and there is no coming off it....you are forever tied to Trump because you are not against him in every post you make...it's the only way to truly draw the line in here between whether you are with them or against them, whoever them may be....even valid points will not help....you have to be labeled or you just on the shelf labelless with no identity... You are forever grouped with Trumpsters and you may even be looked at as a person of interest in the insurrection that caused millions to die....time to get a PO Box and a burner phone....how will you ever survive...
0
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
@THEMUGG Lost words...you have been generalized and categorized on the spreadsheet and there is no coming off it....you are forever tied to Trump because you are not against him in every post you make...it's the only way to truly draw the line in here between whether you are with them or against them, whoever them may be....even valid points will not help....you have to be labeled or you just on the shelf labelless with no identity... You are forever grouped with Trumpsters and you may even be looked at as a person of interest in the insurrection that caused millions to die....time to get a PO Box and a burner phone....how will you ever survive...
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Donald Trump continued his pre-election economic event tour on Tuesday with a lengthy interview with Bloomberg at the Economic Club of Chicago. It was a total mess,” Rolling Stone reports. “Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait did not take it easy on Trump, and it quickly became clear that the former president has no conception of the mechanics of or the potential ramifications of the economic platform he’s running on. Bluntly, the former president was incoherent [emphasis mine] when pressed with real questions about his policies.” David Graham: “When he speaks about the economy, he sounds like a child—which might be the source of his appeal.” https://politicalwire.com/2024/10/15/trump-crumbles-when-pressed-on-economic-policy/#disqus_thread ******* "Incoherent" ain't exactly Presidential material, but it's what is reasonable to expect from "Mr. Bankruptcies." Virtually all economists - liberal, moderate or conservative - say his emphasis on tariffs is a huge mistake. it was incoherent at best
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Donald Trump continued his pre-election economic event tour on Tuesday with a lengthy interview with Bloomberg at the Economic Club of Chicago. It was a total mess,” Rolling Stone reports. “Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait did not take it easy on Trump, and it quickly became clear that the former president has no conception of the mechanics of or the potential ramifications of the economic platform he’s running on. Bluntly, the former president was incoherent [emphasis mine] when pressed with real questions about his policies.” David Graham: “When he speaks about the economy, he sounds like a child—which might be the source of his appeal.” https://politicalwire.com/2024/10/15/trump-crumbles-when-pressed-on-economic-policy/#disqus_thread ******* "Incoherent" ain't exactly Presidential material, but it's what is reasonable to expect from "Mr. Bankruptcies." Virtually all economists - liberal, moderate or conservative - say his emphasis on tariffs is a huge mistake. it was incoherent at best
It is hard to fathom how a grown make like Mugg is attacked with such incessant vitriol simply for stating his opinions . I see far worse partisan babblings in this forum that are addressed with nothing but silence and a look away attitude . Is this real life ?
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
2
It is hard to fathom how a grown make like Mugg is attacked with such incessant vitriol simply for stating his opinions . I see far worse partisan babblings in this forum that are addressed with nothing but silence and a look away attitude . Is this real life ?
It is hard to fathom how a grown make like Mugg is attacked with such incessant vitriol simply for stating his opinions . I see far worse partisan babblings in this forum that are addressed with nothing but silence and a look away attitude . Is this real life ?
Because he's become a glorified 'get off my lawn' guy. Just shaking his fist at a cloud with his anti-Harris (and Biden) comments then has no desire to respond when even slightly pressed. Complains that Biden is in hiding, then complains when he's in out in the public eye. Same goes for many here. Say Biden is too old while Trump is now the oldest nominee ever. Claim Biden is an idiot, but also that he's not even in charge. They want it both ways. Multiple times he's been asked to do a simple comparison of the 2 candidates and there were nothing but crickets.
5
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
It is hard to fathom how a grown make like Mugg is attacked with such incessant vitriol simply for stating his opinions . I see far worse partisan babblings in this forum that are addressed with nothing but silence and a look away attitude . Is this real life ?
Because he's become a glorified 'get off my lawn' guy. Just shaking his fist at a cloud with his anti-Harris (and Biden) comments then has no desire to respond when even slightly pressed. Complains that Biden is in hiding, then complains when he's in out in the public eye. Same goes for many here. Say Biden is too old while Trump is now the oldest nominee ever. Claim Biden is an idiot, but also that he's not even in charge. They want it both ways. Multiple times he's been asked to do a simple comparison of the 2 candidates and there were nothing but crickets.
The true issue in this situation is how partisan this board is. You have one side who rarely if at all interacts but keeps to themselves and does not outwardly offend and attack and then on the other side you have a large group who attack as a narrative but like their political candidate have no substance behind the bluster and then get offended when they are asked to either explain or be reasonable...again just like their candidate. And there are a few here that do little more than follow behind a few others and seek to lift up their situation with accusations and complaints while offering NOTHING of value in the process.
If a member has the audacity to throw down insults and complaints and feels that their words are deserving of being posted on the site, then have the ability to respond, defend, discuss and not be a partisan road block exclusively.
I actually find more value in the one group who does their schtick and does not provoke member to member, keeps to their clan and also keeps the site rules, even if that group does not really want conversation.
To those members who antagonize, provoke and annoy member to member, you will never find a good outcome in this approach, no mod is going to look away when you are breaking the rules and guidelines so this means either keep the guidelines and rules, make good conversation or just step away from the situation and go find a ultra website to hand shake with others who share your view.
2
@BWS77
Correcto..
The true issue in this situation is how partisan this board is. You have one side who rarely if at all interacts but keeps to themselves and does not outwardly offend and attack and then on the other side you have a large group who attack as a narrative but like their political candidate have no substance behind the bluster and then get offended when they are asked to either explain or be reasonable...again just like their candidate. And there are a few here that do little more than follow behind a few others and seek to lift up their situation with accusations and complaints while offering NOTHING of value in the process.
If a member has the audacity to throw down insults and complaints and feels that their words are deserving of being posted on the site, then have the ability to respond, defend, discuss and not be a partisan road block exclusively.
I actually find more value in the one group who does their schtick and does not provoke member to member, keeps to their clan and also keeps the site rules, even if that group does not really want conversation.
To those members who antagonize, provoke and annoy member to member, you will never find a good outcome in this approach, no mod is going to look away when you are breaking the rules and guidelines so this means either keep the guidelines and rules, make good conversation or just step away from the situation and go find a ultra website to hand shake with others who share your view.
Reading his posts The Mugg appears to hands down be a Trump MAGA Far Right supporter not a Republican! The remaining the Republicans party is now just a vehicle to help MAGA in realizing there agenda's ! What I find when having conversations with most MAGA followers IMHO is that the majority, if given the choice of $20,000/year of healthcare/education/retirement/grocery assistance, or getting to see gays/transgender/feminists/illegal immigrants/Muslims/SJWs banned, would choose the latter! They are a very confused angry group!
4
@BWS77
Reading his posts The Mugg appears to hands down be a Trump MAGA Far Right supporter not a Republican! The remaining the Republicans party is now just a vehicle to help MAGA in realizing there agenda's ! What I find when having conversations with most MAGA followers IMHO is that the majority, if given the choice of $20,000/year of healthcare/education/retirement/grocery assistance, or getting to see gays/transgender/feminists/illegal immigrants/Muslims/SJWs banned, would choose the latter! They are a very confused angry group!
Trump rally... Policy? No Arnold Palmer's cock size? Yep
Palmer's daughter said that her late father would be appalled by Trump's lack of civility. He wouldn't believe the arrogance and cruelty of Trump. Republican Michael Steele is also disturbed by Trump talking about Palmer's genitalia instead of economy and more important matters. If elected, don't expect Trump to make America great. He is more interested in self enrichment and revenge against political enemies.
1
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Trump rally... Policy? No Arnold Palmer's cock size? Yep
Palmer's daughter said that her late father would be appalled by Trump's lack of civility. He wouldn't believe the arrogance and cruelty of Trump. Republican Michael Steele is also disturbed by Trump talking about Palmer's genitalia instead of economy and more important matters. If elected, don't expect Trump to make America great. He is more interested in self enrichment and revenge against political enemies.
Palmer's daughter said that her late father would be appalled by Trump's lack of civility. He wouldn't believe the arrogance and cruelty of Trump. Republican Michael Steele is also disturbed by Trump talking about Palmer's genitalia instead of economy and more important matters. If elected, don't expect Trump to make America great. He is more interested in self enrichment and revenge against political enemies.
Why would the racist/convicted felon disparage the memory of a sports hero the same way he disparages the memory of our fallen marine heros?!
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Trump rally...
Policy? No
Arnold Palmer's cock size? Yep
Palmer's daughter said that her late father would be appalled by Trump's lack of civility. He wouldn't believe the arrogance and cruelty of Trump. Republican Michael Steele is also disturbed by Trump talking about Palmer's genitalia instead of economy and more important matters. If elected, don't expect Trump to make America great. He is more interested in self enrichment and revenge against political enemies.
Why would the racist/convicted felon disparage the memory of a sports hero the same way he disparages the memory of our fallen marine heros?!
Trump and Harris’ proposals would both increase the national debt, but Trump’s plan would add $4 trillion more, study finds
CNN -
But those proposals come with hefty price tags.
Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report
1
Trump and Harris’ proposals would both increase the national debt, but Trump’s plan would add $4 trillion more, study finds
CNN -
But those proposals come with hefty price tags.
Harris’ plan would boost the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade, while Trump’s platform would cause it to spike by $7.5 trillion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s report
Trump and Harris’ proposals would both increase the national debt, but Trump’s plan would add $4 trillion more, study finds
Clearly, voters who care about federal deficits and debt should vote for Harris plan which also offer lower inflation and higher economic growth. When the economy is strong, good governments are supposed to reduce deficits by increasing tax revenue and reducing spending. Instead Trump made unnecessary tax cuts to worsen deficits and his future plan threatens more. Trump tax cuts failed to pay for themselves. No boost in employment, investment and economic growth but the rich became richer.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Trump and Harris’ proposals would both increase the national debt, but Trump’s plan would add $4 trillion more, study finds
Clearly, voters who care about federal deficits and debt should vote for Harris plan which also offer lower inflation and higher economic growth. When the economy is strong, good governments are supposed to reduce deficits by increasing tax revenue and reducing spending. Instead Trump made unnecessary tax cuts to worsen deficits and his future plan threatens more. Trump tax cuts failed to pay for themselves. No boost in employment, investment and economic growth but the rich became richer.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.