This is curious because you are so against government subsidy and this is exactly what these tariffs are. They are subsidizing the steel industry and in the end who pays for these tariffs?
The consumer does. It is interesting how you few are A-OK with corporate subsidy but when it comes to the lower class and poor you guys act as if they are looting your personal piggy bank.
Oh and this is not free market....you know the other mirage you guys act like you support...these tariffs are the opposite of free market. If you want to make an IMPACT on the citizens of this country there are much better ways than this joke sham.
This is curious because you are so against government subsidy and this is exactly what these tariffs are. They are subsidizing the steel industry and in the end who pays for these tariffs?
The consumer does. It is interesting how you few are A-OK with corporate subsidy but when it comes to the lower class and poor you guys act as if they are looting your personal piggy bank.
Oh and this is not free market....you know the other mirage you guys act like you support...these tariffs are the opposite of free market. If you want to make an IMPACT on the citizens of this country there are much better ways than this joke sham.
Well if you saw the debt instruments he floated (which I did) and that he defaulted on this debt (which he did twice) then the conclusion is two times he did not care about defaulting on his debt and he had/has a history of using heavy heavy leverage and that cost him his companies multiple times. Trump has said he loves debt...use that search engine to figure it out.
Sheesh it is so easy taking out the trash...come at me with something stronger next time!
Well if you saw the debt instruments he floated (which I did) and that he defaulted on this debt (which he did twice) then the conclusion is two times he did not care about defaulting on his debt and he had/has a history of using heavy heavy leverage and that cost him his companies multiple times. Trump has said he loves debt...use that search engine to figure it out.
Sheesh it is so easy taking out the trash...come at me with something stronger next time!
The COST of this "good" is very very very bad....so do you want me to forget that these "good" things are not really good especially if you look longer than a six month time horizon?
Financing short term benefit with massive long term costs is awful, but Trump has a career of this so it is not shocking. Go look up the junk debt he had to float and then BK'd on so he could speculate as he did. This is not Atlantic City, the US cannot accumulate negative returning long term debt and then just walk away from it like Trump has. Educate yourself on most all of his actions and see more than a few nickles in front of your feet.
The COST of this "good" is very very very bad....so do you want me to forget that these "good" things are not really good especially if you look longer than a six month time horizon?
Financing short term benefit with massive long term costs is awful, but Trump has a career of this so it is not shocking. Go look up the junk debt he had to float and then BK'd on so he could speculate as he did. This is not Atlantic City, the US cannot accumulate negative returning long term debt and then just walk away from it like Trump has. Educate yourself on most all of his actions and see more than a few nickles in front of your feet.
Yeah here is the uneducated reply....do you know what average hourly earnings are and why that is more important than the top headline job number? And did you care to see what sectors these jobs were created in?
Of course not..
Yeah here is the uneducated reply....do you know what average hourly earnings are and why that is more important than the top headline job number? And did you care to see what sectors these jobs were created in?
Of course not..
Wow...
Wow...
This is curious because you are so against government subsidy and this is exactly what these tariffs are. They are subsidizing the steel industry and in the end who pays for these tariffs?
The consumer does. It is interesting how you few are A-OK with corporate subsidy but when it comes to the lower class and poor you guys act as if they are looting your personal piggy bank.
Oh and this is not free market....you know the other mirage you guys act like you support...these tariffs are the opposite of free market. If you want to make an IMPACT on the citizens of this country there are much better ways than this joke sham.
With a subsidy, however, the domestic producer is still benefited, but the government receives no revenue. And, in fact, they have to spend money because they paid the subsidies to the domestic producers to help them produce more products.
So, the effect on the consumer may be that they are made worse off by a tariff, governments are receiving money; whereas with a subsidy the government has to pay money.
So, therefore, it is more likely that governments would prefer to use a a tariff method then the subsidy method.
This is curious because you are so against government subsidy and this is exactly what these tariffs are. They are subsidizing the steel industry and in the end who pays for these tariffs?
The consumer does. It is interesting how you few are A-OK with corporate subsidy but when it comes to the lower class and poor you guys act as if they are looting your personal piggy bank.
Oh and this is not free market....you know the other mirage you guys act like you support...these tariffs are the opposite of free market. If you want to make an IMPACT on the citizens of this country there are much better ways than this joke sham.
With a subsidy, however, the domestic producer is still benefited, but the government receives no revenue. And, in fact, they have to spend money because they paid the subsidies to the domestic producers to help them produce more products.
So, the effect on the consumer may be that they are made worse off by a tariff, governments are receiving money; whereas with a subsidy the government has to pay money.
So, therefore, it is more likely that governments would prefer to use a a tariff method then the subsidy method.
That is an obvious answer...the government involvement in the Chinese economy is dramatically different than ours for a variety of reasons..their government is Communist in structure and nature and their government is HIGHLY protective of their business entities to the point of saving them from insolvency. Their economy is in a different phase than ours even if they were a capitalistic form which they are not. The comparison is pretty stupid to be honest.
If you are drawing comparisons to make a conclusion then other assumptions need to be equal to draw that comparison and it just isnt so. Why would I waste time on such a stupid comment from Musk?
Talk about a debt junkie, Musk and Trump must both belong to the same golf club, they have several similarities.
That is an obvious answer...the government involvement in the Chinese economy is dramatically different than ours for a variety of reasons..their government is Communist in structure and nature and their government is HIGHLY protective of their business entities to the point of saving them from insolvency. Their economy is in a different phase than ours even if they were a capitalistic form which they are not. The comparison is pretty stupid to be honest.
If you are drawing comparisons to make a conclusion then other assumptions need to be equal to draw that comparison and it just isnt so. Why would I waste time on such a stupid comment from Musk?
Talk about a debt junkie, Musk and Trump must both belong to the same golf club, they have several similarities.
Read genius....you cannot compare our government and decisions and theirs, the structure is completely different and the approach. If you want to draw comparisons and be legit there needs to be as equal assumptions as possible.
I answered the question. They tax ours different because their approach is different, they are COMMUNIST and they go to any length to protect their fledgling economy and companies. NO comparison at all, why not compare womens rights or air quality.
Read genius....you cannot compare our government and decisions and theirs, the structure is completely different and the approach. If you want to draw comparisons and be legit there needs to be as equal assumptions as possible.
I answered the question. They tax ours different because their approach is different, they are COMMUNIST and they go to any length to protect their fledgling economy and companies. NO comparison at all, why not compare womens rights or air quality.
If you do another "democrats" insult when you dont agree with my comments it wont end well for you. No need for that crap.
You cannot compare our tariffs and theirs, its silly. Even comparing the EU and the US is a stretch, but at least it is in the same ballpark. China and the US are not even in the same universe for comparisons.
If you do another "democrats" insult when you dont agree with my comments it wont end well for you. No need for that crap.
You cannot compare our tariffs and theirs, its silly. Even comparing the EU and the US is a stretch, but at least it is in the same ballpark. China and the US are not even in the same universe for comparisons.
We arent getting slaughtered, how can you compare them and us in any way? Do you understand how pricing works and the benefit of lower prices? If the US matches tariffs who absorbs those increases? Those increases are line item tacked onto the MSRP of the car and the consumer eats that through higher sticker prices.
Can you name the enormous millions of Chinese cars sold in the USA right now? What Chinese branded cars have you purchased in the past, how about neighbors or co-workers?
We arent getting slaughtered, how can you compare them and us in any way? Do you understand how pricing works and the benefit of lower prices? If the US matches tariffs who absorbs those increases? Those increases are line item tacked onto the MSRP of the car and the consumer eats that through higher sticker prices.
Can you name the enormous millions of Chinese cars sold in the USA right now? What Chinese branded cars have you purchased in the past, how about neighbors or co-workers?
Canada, Mexico and South Korea are the largest steel exporters to the U.S. China is #11. Retaliation can come from our neighbors instead of China since they're the one's getting hit the hardest.
Canada, Mexico and South Korea are the largest steel exporters to the U.S. China is #11. Retaliation can come from our neighbors instead of China since they're the one's getting hit the hardest.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.