I by and large like Ron Paul. So, don't know where you got disrespect from. I am simply saying there are various reasons for not getting involved, not saying all reasons are the same. I am not even saying any are bad. It is cool that you don't think we have obligation or desire to help, no problem with that either.
Not clear what church and state have to do with this.
As I asked WSC---you support no war/interventions except the 4? Is that correct? Or no?
I honestly cannot admit at this point what Bush administration did was wrong. Even if I didn't agree with it I cannot say that they did it with wrong information or wrong intentions. Again, imagine the reporter that could get that smoking gun.
Nothing wrong with being stubborn if you feel you are right---I see you for sure feel that way.
On this one we can continue to disagree. We can agree on Munn, Stossel, Paul and maybe Johnson. Coming around on him. Don't wanna keep back and forth on this guys thread. Will catch you in next one.

Today, we live in a state of undeclared, endless war, power projection, by choice, disguised as necessity, in secret, to increase the license to act, to minimalize oversight and accountability, labeled war to engender fear and urgency, as well as, labeled something other than war for expediency and legal circumvention.

You keep assuming that I’m saying the Bush administration went to war with evil intentions. That is not what I am saying. I’m saying the information the Bush administration used was fabricated to legally justify a war that the office of special plans believed was necessary for the future of the United States and the world.

"Again, imagine the reporter that could get that smoking gun."



What more can the media do? I think the media did a solid job getting the truth out to Americans. How many more smoking guns do you want?
