Pittsburgh at washington (11/03/2008)

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2008

Posts: 1854

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 4:48 PM ET #126

Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

Oh I forgot to mention I had Cinci on the ML for 2K and took the PATS heavy for 5K. You see, I too can post picks after they happen.

Premian

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 1609

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 4:49 PM ET #127

I just got the Steelers at +3.

goinggone

Captain

Joined: Apr, 2006

Posts: 8634

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:08 PM ET #128

Quote Originally Posted by Joke77:

Does anyone know who Dr bob is on tonight? He has a 3 star play....

3* WA Skins -2.5 or less

tcrotejr

Rookie

Joined: Jul, 2008

Posts: 664

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:27 PM ET #129

both teams beat up. wash looking forward to rest,don't you think they will be playing with a bit more abandon? hate going against long trends but IMO i think under here and J.C. can/will have people open to throw too using portis on play action. was knows they have to pressure big ben, if they can, i think was has a really good chance to stay on the field,burn some clock and have possesion advantage. the real key here is going to be field position, whichever team can capitalize will most likely win. defense showing up will be a factor also. going against the grain, was/under for me! P.S. fuck a bunch of idiots on here........

Fpronk

Banned

Joined: Feb, 2008

Posts: 2352

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:39 PM ET #130

Quote Originally Posted by kurylyk99:

Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

Considering Washington hasn't beaten anyone by more than 8 points teasing Pittsburgh to +9 and UNDER 44 looks like a good play. Its more likely this game goes under 30 than over 44.

I'm new to this site and I'm confused already. Why even bother teasing the game if "Its more likely this game goes under 30 than over 44?" I was thinking about the over but now I'm confused. Could someone help out?

Are you serious? Well, if you arent sure PITTS can cover the +2 then you could tease it 7 to +9. The REDSKINS have not beaten anyone by more than 8 this year and I don't think they start tonight. So if you're going to tease the game you might as well tease it with the UNDER...these are two high scoring offenses.

king_of_diamond

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 1560

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:40 PM ET #131

i'm on the steelers to win this one tonight. too many injuries for the skins on both sides of the ball. the steelers are getting some key players back (parker from injury, holmes from suspension). it's been a while since this unit has played together with all of its parts. i was surprised to see my book having it listed at +2.5. i bought the hook for insurance, but i would probably have taken this game if it were steelers -2.5. GL

tcrotejr

Rookie

Joined: Jul, 2008

Posts: 664

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:41 PM ET #132

realize that was basic common sense, but, with the trend to over think mnf, thought a back to basics might be in order

m_angel175

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 1777

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:45 PM ET #133

Under 37.5

m_angel175

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 1777

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:45 PM ET #134

Under 37.5

m_angel175

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 1777

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:45 PM ET #135

Under 37.5

Mickster21

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2008

Posts: 2619

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:50 PM ET #136

Quote Originally Posted by danstyk:

New rule: if you are not going to use any words in a post, then you must have an avatar with a hot woman strutting and and showing her stuff to keep us all entertained.

I SECOND THAT.....

Mickster21

Veteran

Joined: Mar, 2008

Posts: 2619

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 5:57 PM ET #137

By the way, I like the Skins tonight, at home in front of a rowdy crowd. But I saw Fpronk and that tease he had. So I'm taking the Skins -2 and then tease Pitt +9 and over 29. (I hate unders!) Good luck to all...

vehllib

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2006

Posts: 46

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:06 PM ET #138

Quote Originally Posted by goinggone:

3* WA Skins -2.5 or less

seriously??? is that really his pick.

jjmandl

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2007

Posts: 148

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:09 PM ET #139

dencol

Veteran

Joined: Aug, 2007

Posts: 1718

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:10 PM ET #140

Quote Originally Posted by lilsickone:

I'M PUTTING 90% OF MY BANK ROLL ON STEELERS TONIGHT! THEY ARE #1 AGAINST THE PASS AND #3 AGAINST THE RUN PERIOD. THEY WILL BOTTLE UP PORTIS AND END HIS 5 GAME STREAK. WASHINGTON DEFENSE IS SOFT AND SO IS THEIR SECONDARY. MY BIGGEST PLAY OF THE YEAR. ALSO WATCH OUT FOR JASON CAMPBALLS FIRST INTERCEPTION.

STEELERS TONIGHT 90% OF MY BANK. MY BIGGEST PLAY OF THE YEAR. THAT'S JUST HOW I ROLL!!!!

GEE WHIZ $ 90 dollars....go deep

I couldn't resist

Bluefin

Captain

Joined: Nov, 2006

Posts: 8485

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:13 PM ET #141

Quote Originally Posted by almosthomeless:

i just noticed a spelling error. i meant "now" instead of "know" and "e" should be "be"

i should not have mentioned my mistake. with the collection of stooges looking at this site most of you wouldn't have caught it anyway.

Raulbloodworth. i like your style. showing your betting slip like that. 350.00 is a good size wager (at least for me) on a monday nighter. i bet most of the prognosticators (bettors) who frequent this site feel the same way and i would venture to guess many of the "regulars" live in their momma's basement.

would like to confirm something from your earlier post, you went 6 out of 6 right, not 6 and 6. if it was the later, i really hope you tease works.

what do you bozos think about middleing games? any of you got the sack to try it. i know my man raulblodworth does.

another thing. artie-lange - i hope you are who you say you are but i think not based on the real artie lange's aversion to computers. looking forward to "too fat to fish"

goodbye for now.

You must be kiddin hombre Albert Einstein couldn't spell and we all know what an idiot he was.

miketheman

Prospect

Joined: Feb, 2006

Posts: 36

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:16 PM ET #142

First thing about teasers, and I've played quite a few, is they are definitly hit or miss. But Pitt + 9 and over 30 seems pretty solid. I'm going with Pitt plus the points or even moneyline straight up. I think the lack of pass rush by the Redskins will allow Big Ben to get the ball downfield to his receivers and with Parker back they should be better with their run game also. Bottom line Washington is not as good Defensively as Giants or Eagles. PITTSBURG ALL THE WAY TONIGHT!!

too4themoney

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2008

Posts: 27

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:21 PM ET #143

Did anyone watch Mike n' Mike haha little info about the skins playing the day before the election and the voting trends. If the steelers when tonight Obama will win if the skins win tonight McCain wins.

Why campaign...watch the skins.... GO STEELERS

paticake

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 514

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:24 PM ET #144

I have been listening to all of you trashing each other, kurylyk,n just leave Fpronk alone he is only trying to offer advice and by the way, just what is a kurylyk anyway,... Steelers will roll...........

Rockdog

Banned

Joined: Jul, 2008

Posts: 5485

Posted: Nov. 3, 2008 - 6:28 PM ET #145

Ben Roth was sacked many times against the Eagles' and Giants' defensive lineman. Well, the Redskins' defensive line isn't as good as the Eagles and Giants, so Roth should have some time to pick his spots. I see the Steelers pulling it out late in the game.