Golly, if you couldn't catch on to the fact that Alex Smith was weighing that whole team down, then that's a shame. I watched the Niners lose time and again over the past three seasons. and made a tighty profit while doing so.
Having a good QB is essential, and Brees is a good one. But given your past record w/ Niners games I have to thank my lucky stars, that you're taking the Saints today. Enjoy the show, friend.
THANKS G...
LOOKS LIKE I WAS RIGHT ...THERE ARE A LOT OF SUCKERS OUT THERE ..BUT GL ON YOUR OTHER SELECTIONS
0
Quote Originally Posted by Unit_G:
Golly, if you couldn't catch on to the fact that Alex Smith was weighing that whole team down, then that's a shame. I watched the Niners lose time and again over the past three seasons. and made a tighty profit while doing so.
Having a good QB is essential, and Brees is a good one. But given your past record w/ Niners games I have to thank my lucky stars, that you're taking the Saints today. Enjoy the show, friend.
THANKS G...
LOOKS LIKE I WAS RIGHT ...THERE ARE A LOT OF SUCKERS OUT THERE ..BUT GL ON YOUR OTHER SELECTIONS
I just actually registered, but have been viewing the forum for awhile....First Post!
49's ML San Fransisco's LB's are took quick for those Bush screens. Gore will manage the clock well for the Niners, along with O'Sullivan-Bruce clicking in the red zone. Brees is good, but against a Bronco's defense that has no secondary. QB with no weapons isn't much of a quarterback, plus the Saints defense is pathetic, both run and pass.
Bengals -3 Their defense actually showed up last week against the Giants, and their offense looked like the old-school offense, despite the #'s. (but still expect this game to be a shootout). They blew a chance to beat the defending Super Bowl champs, even though NY's better away than home. I'm seeing the Bengals really showing their true colors in this one and Anderson's hype to be smashed in the end.
Bears/Eagles under Eagles great rush defense, and Orton can't throw for squat. Westbrook (healthy) would run all over a Bears defense in week 1, but not after that humiliating OT loss vs. Tampa Bay
Chicago ML They're hungry for a win, Mcnabb and Westbrook not 100%...enough said
6 team parlay for fun
Parlay Wager
- Selected Combination: 1 Parlay of 6 Teams
NFL[198] CINCINNATI
-3-120
NFL[203] SAN FRANCISCO
+170
NFL[206] CAROLINA
-290
NFL[211] BUFFALO
-360
NFL[218]
PHILADELPHIA v CHICAGO
u41½-150 (B+2)
NFL[218] CHICAGO
+150
25 WINS 861.05
HEY KILLER NICE PIX.....I DIDN'T THINK THERE WAS ANYBODY THAT WOULD LAY THAT KIND OM NUT ON THE MONEY LINE
YOU HAVE RENEWED MY FAITH IN HUMANTY I AM STARTING UP THE BOOK AGAIN AND I WANT YOU, AND MONEYMAKER, THE SHARP AND DDEVIOUS AS MY FIRST CLIENTS... STAY TUNED I WILL CONTACT YOU
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLKiller:
I just actually registered, but have been viewing the forum for awhile....First Post!
49's ML San Fransisco's LB's are took quick for those Bush screens. Gore will manage the clock well for the Niners, along with O'Sullivan-Bruce clicking in the red zone. Brees is good, but against a Bronco's defense that has no secondary. QB with no weapons isn't much of a quarterback, plus the Saints defense is pathetic, both run and pass.
Bengals -3 Their defense actually showed up last week against the Giants, and their offense looked like the old-school offense, despite the #'s. (but still expect this game to be a shootout). They blew a chance to beat the defending Super Bowl champs, even though NY's better away than home. I'm seeing the Bengals really showing their true colors in this one and Anderson's hype to be smashed in the end.
Bears/Eagles under Eagles great rush defense, and Orton can't throw for squat. Westbrook (healthy) would run all over a Bears defense in week 1, but not after that humiliating OT loss vs. Tampa Bay
Chicago ML They're hungry for a win, Mcnabb and Westbrook not 100%...enough said
6 team parlay for fun
Parlay Wager
- Selected Combination: 1 Parlay of 6 Teams
NFL[198] CINCINNATI
-3-120
NFL[203] SAN FRANCISCO
+170
NFL[206] CAROLINA
-290
NFL[211] BUFFALO
-360
NFL[218]
PHILADELPHIA v CHICAGO
u41½-150 (B+2)
NFL[218] CHICAGO
+150
25 WINS 861.05
HEY KILLER NICE PIX.....I DIDN'T THINK THERE WAS ANYBODY THAT WOULD LAY THAT KIND OM NUT ON THE MONEY LINE
YOU HAVE RENEWED MY FAITH IN HUMANTY I AM STARTING UP THE BOOK AGAIN AND I WANT YOU, AND MONEYMAKER, THE SHARP AND DDEVIOUS AS MY FIRST CLIENTS... STAY TUNED I WILL CONTACT YOU
When was the last time you have seen the saints stop the run? or the pass? weak front and secondary, rely on putting points on the board, which isn't gonna happen vs. the saints. Good luck on the half, but I'm going the other way for sure
today
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLKiller:
When was the last time you have seen the saints stop the run? or the pass? weak front and secondary, rely on putting points on the board, which isn't gonna happen vs. the saints. Good luck on the half, but I'm going the other way for sure
Congrats to the smart ones that took NO at home...Realize that SF is NOT a good team. I love how they drop the spread showing where the public was really at!!!! Look foward for next week...
0
Congrats to the smart ones that took NO at home...Realize that SF is NOT a good team. I love how they drop the spread showing where the public was really at!!!! Look foward for next week...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Good luck today bro.
Hot Forum Topics
