Seattle has a better defense, better run game, plays in the stronger conference and has had a tougher road to get here IMO. Denver Plus the public is all over Denver.
Things to consider...
Take the Seahawks away from the 12th Man and they are nowhere near as explosive, as has been proven on the scoreboard throughout the season.
Denver's defense has come alive of late, holding opponents to an average of 15 PPG in their last four games. The offense has still been very effective, producing an average of 28.2 PPG in their last five games. Those same five games have gone UNDER the total.
Seattle's offense has faded. They haven't gone OVER the total since November. Marshawn Lynch's rushing and their defense have been keeping them in games while Russell Wilson has become a game manager. Seattle has given up an average of 12 PPG since the beginning of December.
Experience. Denver has it. Seattle does not. John Fox is coaching his 2nd SB. Peyton is playing his 3rd. Welker is playing in his 3rd. Standout CB Rodgers-Cromartie is playing his 2nd. Champ Bailey, while he's never played in a championship, is a 15 year defensive veteran and a focused leader. Russell Wilson is in his 2nd year. Coach Pete Carroll is an SB virgin. I see a lot of parallels between this game and last year's Baltimore (veteran experience) versus San Francisco (youthful emotion) matchup.
Weather will be everything IMO. In a dome or fair conditions, Denver takes this by 10+ points. If the conditions are garbage - high winds, snow, sleet and / or bitter cold - Peyton will have issues no doubt. However I do believe that the Broncos will get it done one way or another.
BAD WEATHER FINAL SCORE: Denver 17 Seattle 13
GOOD WEATHER FINAL SCORE: Denver 26 Seattle 17
So I guess it's Denver and the Under regardless...
GL to all
You said it all buddy...
Things to consider...
Take the Seahawks away from the 12th Man and they are nowhere near as explosive, as has been proven on the scoreboard throughout the season.
Denver's defense has come alive of late, holding opponents to an average of 15 PPG in their last four games. The offense has still been very effective, producing an average of 28.2 PPG in their last five games. Those same five games have gone UNDER the total.
Seattle's offense has faded. They haven't gone OVER the total since November. Marshawn Lynch's rushing and their defense have been keeping them in games while Russell Wilson has become a game manager. Seattle has given up an average of 12 PPG since the beginning of December.
Experience. Denver has it. Seattle does not. John Fox is coaching his 2nd SB. Peyton is playing his 3rd. Welker is playing in his 3rd. Standout CB Rodgers-Cromartie is playing his 2nd. Champ Bailey, while he's never played in a championship, is a 15 year defensive veteran and a focused leader. Russell Wilson is in his 2nd year. Coach Pete Carroll is an SB virgin. I see a lot of parallels between this game and last year's Baltimore (veteran experience) versus San Francisco (youthful emotion) matchup.
Weather will be everything IMO. In a dome or fair conditions, Denver takes this by 10+ points. If the conditions are garbage - high winds, snow, sleet and / or bitter cold - Peyton will have issues no doubt. However I do believe that the Broncos will get it done one way or another.
BAD WEATHER FINAL SCORE: Denver 17 Seattle 13
GOOD WEATHER FINAL SCORE: Denver 26 Seattle 17
So I guess it's Denver and the Under regardless...
GL to all
You said it all buddy...
COMPARABLE MATCHUPS
2002 Patriots beat Rams 20-17. Belichick earned
coaching icon status after his defensive schemes stymied The Greatest Show on
Turf.
2003 Bucs beat Raiders 48-21.
Gruden!
2008 Giants beat Patriots 17-14.
This is perhaps the closest comparison to this years game. Before Manning’s big year it was Brady-Moss
video game season that held the record for most points per game on
average.
2009 Steelers beat Cardinals 27-23.
Pitt was known for their defense that lead the league in points
allowed. AZ was 3rd in points.
2000 Rams beat Titans 23-16. Titans
imposed their will and controlled the flow of this game.
2004 Patriots beat Panthers 32-29. The Panthers let the pace of the game get out
of their comfort zone but kept it close to the end.
2007 Colts beat Bears 29-17. Bears
held Manning to 1 TD on a busted coverage where Manning somehow escaped Tank
Johnson. The Bears committed 5
turnovers.
COMPARABLE MATCHUPS
2002 Patriots beat Rams 20-17. Belichick earned
coaching icon status after his defensive schemes stymied The Greatest Show on
Turf.
2003 Bucs beat Raiders 48-21.
Gruden!
2008 Giants beat Patriots 17-14.
This is perhaps the closest comparison to this years game. Before Manning’s big year it was Brady-Moss
video game season that held the record for most points per game on
average.
2009 Steelers beat Cardinals 27-23.
Pitt was known for their defense that lead the league in points
allowed. AZ was 3rd in points.
2000 Rams beat Titans 23-16. Titans
imposed their will and controlled the flow of this game.
2004 Patriots beat Panthers 32-29. The Panthers let the pace of the game get out
of their comfort zone but kept it close to the end.
2007 Colts beat Bears 29-17. Bears
held Manning to 1 TD on a busted coverage where Manning somehow escaped Tank
Johnson. The Bears committed 5
turnovers.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.