Streelman -105 v Si Woo Kim Streelman plays great here. Last 5x here 2/7/6/14/17 Kim last 5x here MC/4/MC/35/MC Last 2 weeks Streelman finished ahead of Kim
Last 2 weeks Streelman 22/37 Kim 50/MC
Stanley +110 v Sabbatini Stanley playing much better recently. I followed him closely last week as I had Steele -10 v Stanley -9 Stanley didn't putt well but played very well. Stanley last 3 weeks 36/18/32 Sabbatini was awful last week MC Rd1 he was +6 next to last in entire field. Usually pretty good but last week is a Red flag and he has a lousy history here. Sabbatini finishes here MC/72/48/MC/MC/64/MC/MC/15/MC Think the wrong guy may be favored here
No time to write-up now, will return with more
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Last week PGA 4-1 (3-1 tourney/1-0 daily)
Streelman -105 v Si Woo Kim Streelman plays great here. Last 5x here 2/7/6/14/17 Kim last 5x here MC/4/MC/35/MC Last 2 weeks Streelman finished ahead of Kim
Last 2 weeks Streelman 22/37 Kim 50/MC
Stanley +110 v Sabbatini Stanley playing much better recently. I followed him closely last week as I had Steele -10 v Stanley -9 Stanley didn't putt well but played very well. Stanley last 3 weeks 36/18/32 Sabbatini was awful last week MC Rd1 he was +6 next to last in entire field. Usually pretty good but last week is a Red flag and he has a lousy history here. Sabbatini finishes here MC/72/48/MC/MC/64/MC/MC/15/MC Think the wrong guy may be favored here
Norlander -130 v Steele Norlander quietly playing great golf. Last 3 were 22/2/12 and was 25th here last year Steele has been pretty decent truth be told finishing 30/21/4 his last 3 starts but he has a lousy history playing here MC all 3x Hasn't played here though since 2014 I won my bets on both Steele and Norlander last week but Steele just isn't a very good putter Edge Norlander
Burns -115 v Fowler This is just a bet against Fowler who is probably the most overrated golfer in the world Burns is a good young player with last 2 finishes 22&18 but never played this event. Fowler hadn't played it since 2012 when he MC
Nesmith -125 v Reavie Just dont think Reavie is very good right now. Last 5 finishes MC/MC/67/MC/MC Meanwhile Nesmith finished 7th last week and was 11th here last year in his 1st start
0
Norlander -130 v Steele Norlander quietly playing great golf. Last 3 were 22/2/12 and was 25th here last year Steele has been pretty decent truth be told finishing 30/21/4 his last 3 starts but he has a lousy history playing here MC all 3x Hasn't played here though since 2014 I won my bets on both Steele and Norlander last week but Steele just isn't a very good putter Edge Norlander
Burns -115 v Fowler This is just a bet against Fowler who is probably the most overrated golfer in the world Burns is a good young player with last 2 finishes 22&18 but never played this event. Fowler hadn't played it since 2012 when he MC
Nesmith -125 v Reavie Just dont think Reavie is very good right now. Last 5 finishes MC/MC/67/MC/MC Meanwhile Nesmith finished 7th last week and was 11th here last year in his 1st start
Sky I think I agree on Nesmith as perhaps my favorite pick too. Nesmith stock rising Reavie stock been heading down now for awhile with no reason to think he turns things around this week. Nesmith 11th here last year and 7th last week
0
Sky sky and panther thanks
Sky I think I agree on Nesmith as perhaps my favorite pick too. Nesmith stock rising Reavie stock been heading down now for awhile with no reason to think he turns things around this week. Nesmith 11th here last year and 7th last week
Rd2 Stanley -125 v Lewis Line higher than you would think it would be as RD1 Lewis was -6 and Stanley was -2 on the wide open fairways of Pebble Beach course. Lewis hit only 43% fairways on the wide open fairways of PB while Stanley hit 93% fairways Both hit 83% greens Stanley as usual putted lousy -1.7 strokes
Rd2 they play the tight tree lined Spyglass course which has hosted the US Open. RD2 there will be a premium on hitting fairways. If Lewis hits 43% fairways today he will be in big trouble
Seems like books begging you to take Lewis plus $$ but I'm thinking Stanley is the play
0
Rd2 Stanley -125 v Lewis Line higher than you would think it would be as RD1 Lewis was -6 and Stanley was -2 on the wide open fairways of Pebble Beach course. Lewis hit only 43% fairways on the wide open fairways of PB while Stanley hit 93% fairways Both hit 83% greens Stanley as usual putted lousy -1.7 strokes
Rd2 they play the tight tree lined Spyglass course which has hosted the US Open. RD2 there will be a premium on hitting fairways. If Lewis hits 43% fairways today he will be in big trouble
Seems like books begging you to take Lewis plus $$ but I'm thinking Stanley is the play
Through 15 holes hitting 45% fairways and somehow on a US Open type course (rough probably not nearly as bad as at Open) he is -2 through 15 with lousy numbers. Stanley is also -2 Hitting 91% fairways.
Not where I thought we would be but AS
0
I'll take a push at this point
AS through 15
Lewis is a magician.
Through 15 holes hitting 45% fairways and somehow on a US Open type course (rough probably not nearly as bad as at Open) he is -2 through 15 with lousy numbers. Stanley is also -2 Hitting 91% fairways.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.