Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
That is a LOT of points. I wouldn't bet anything against Oregon right now though, very very well coached, firing on all cylinders. Everyone can shoot the three, explosive offense. Capable of beating any mid Pac team by 30 on any given day
|
Sparky42 | 2 |
|
|
ATL ml Yesterday
|
herbshack | 1630 |
|
|
processed 2nd week of March, waited 43 days, they posted it back to my account, reprocessed, still waiting, today is day 48, man I need a new book!
|
Autzen | 3 |
|
|
Still nothing yet. They claim its on its way. Waiting for a couple grand, when should I get worried? lol! And which book should I switch too for CFB?
|
Autzen | 16 |
|
|
Train, did you take a look at VT +15?
Tech just beat them a month ago, last years game a better 15-1 (conf) UVA team at home beat a much worse 2-14 (in conf) VT team by 12 (under 15) and UVA largest margin of victory in last 18 games is 16 points I'm playing it regardless, just curious what you saw, good luck today |
TRAIN69 | 25 |
|
|
have been loving your totals plays, thanks man
|
TRAIN69 | 12 |
|
|
Thanks Train
|
TRAIN69 | 17 |
|
|
went with Dartmouth +.5 1h, thanks Prophet
|
Prophet1 | 70 |
|
|
|
Damon102 | 19 |
|
|
beat 0-12 Kansas by 6 points, 23-17 in mid NOVEMBER! A senior quarterback, how much better is TCU with this QB 7 weeks later? Boykin went down in the 1st quarter and back up Bram and TCU managed 13 point of offense in a little over 3 quarters, that's rough. Duck homer so I'm all over them reguardless. But there is a little history about TCU with Bram at the helm. Maybe I'm missing something but seems like easy money, too easy? What am I missing here at a 7 point spread? 15-20 seems closer
|
Autzen | 7 |
|
|
I hope you are right Rex, if not a pretty good chance I won't play it and then be pissed about it for a month, thanks
|
Autzen | 7 |
|
|
how do you cash out on 5dimes?
|
Autzen | 7 |
|
|
I would honestly take Oregon -15 here, sooo much speed and talent on offense and now a QB that has finally settled in. Defense is not fantastic, shouldn't matter. 52-31. Where can I find it? I'd prefer not to get signed up with another book but I hear Bovada is crap anyway, I wouldn't know, they are the only one I've used. Thanks and GL
|
Autzen | 7 |
|
|
The law also shows us that Iowa will score around 35 2nd half, POUND IT!!! lol
|
rickywade67 | 22 |
|
|
|
Lala1975 | 30 |
|
|
I've done decent picking in the pac12 this year and Stanford is part of the reason why. They have been under valued all season, they were 9-4 against the spread, all they did was win me money. Having my eye on the pac for many years has given me a lot of respect for this team, especially watching them beat my Ducks. I won't claim to know a lot about Iowa other than the obvious. I guess what I'm getting at is Stanford is no joke, there are probably only a couple teams out there that could beat them 2 out of 3 times, I'm not sure Iowa is one of those. The two spreads I was waiting to come for bowls were Washington State (covered$$) and Stanford, both way under valued teams. Stanford rolled all year except season opener (doesn;t count) and a 2 point loss to Oregon, who could beat anybody on any given night, except for bama. Disciplined football team with a senior quarterback that knows how to win, I'll be on Stanford -7, but I could be wrong, GL
|
Mountandume | 17 |
|
|
Took Arizona live at -10.5, am on Utah as well. I watched this AZ team go toe to toe with the Ducks in the desert, think they are going to put up a ton of points, clearly New Mexico can score but I don't think they are keeping up with Arizona, 40 something to 17 seems about right. And of course watched Utah dismantle the Ducks in Autzen, a very well coached team that had a great game plan, well coached, will put my money there, GL today!
|
Autzen | 1 |
|
|
Great week man!!
|
Damon102 | 75 |
|
|
Thank you kindly
|
pappadoc | 14 |
|
|
Hmmmmm
|
Tune2ime | 32 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.