Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by joepecsi: Good luck buddy !!!! |
bet-clever | 4 |
|
|
2/3
Alala Minnesota... |
bet-clever | 4 |
|
|
Hello all
Wild OT
Caps OT
Sens-Avs over 12.5 PIM |
bet-clever | 4 |
|
|
|
bet-clever | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NickySantoro1: Khudobin is good.. Of course but Andersen is better and young but I took the Ducks even if I saw Khudobin as starter.
|
bet-clever | 7 |
|
|
Be careful, Khudobin will start against the Flames.
|
bet-clever | 7 |
|
|
Hello all
Ducks OT
|
bet-clever | 7 |
|
|
GL for you pick.
However, look this:
Ducks for me. |
centralflaguy | 16 |
|
|
Nice pick Pecsi, I'm leaning the Habs too. I already took the Jackets for tonight's game. PS: I sent you an invite. BOL for your picks guys.
|
joepecsi | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by joepecsi: i have nothing against you, and i try to make friends here on this site,that's all i do... And i respect other peoples opinion, but to come and say that none of my picks are good is not right after i spend most of my nights analizing and studying my play's with-out getting any sleep just to help some of you folks on this site to make some money...I'm a good guy who has a big heart, and most of the time i will go out of my way just to help others....I admit that maybe you just tried to help me in that tampa game since they have many injuries, and that's great from your part, but in the past the Rangers have killed when iv'e bet against tampa , even with-out Stamkos...This tampa team alway's play's good against the Rangers, no matter who they have !!! sorry if i ofended you, because that's not my style, but i'm your friend till the end...take care buddy !!! Ahhh, this is the guy I want to see. I just tried to help. ;-) BOL for your next picks. :) |
joepecsi | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by joepecsi: betclever where are you now!!!, because i would pay anything to see your face, ....MAN DO YOU LOOK STUPID RIGHT NOW !! That's what happens when you trash my picks.....I admit my loss with the minnesota wild, but i smacked your face with the Ducks win...plus remember all that bragging that you did with not given the lightning a chance to win against the RANGERS.... WELL THINK AGAIN, BECAUSE TAMPA JUST BEAT THE RANGERS WITH OUT ALL OF THEIR GOOD PLAYER'S...RANGERS JUST CAN'T BEAT THE LIGHTNINGS !!! Where is the Wild? Read this pepsi, I don't have to droll on your picks. :) https://www.bet-clever.com/sujet/nhl-saison-15-16-du-20-11-2015.7330/#post-41879 This is my forum, you will see that with every pick/game come with an analyze/explanation. (sorry for the link but I just want to show what's an analyse). Additionally, you wrote "I smacked your face". Man, step down from your cloud, how old are you? We are here to win together and share our experience no? Earn about this and you will be a better man tomorrow for your next picks. ;-) PS: The analyzes is in French but it doesn't matter, the most important is the result. Good job anyway for your picks but the Bolts won on the string. :) |
joepecsi | 56 |
|
|
@Pepsi,
You wrote this: you better go and get some lessons from the best ?? Man, do you watch NHL games a part take trends from covers? Did you watch Bolts games without these 5 guys? Do you think that the Rangers will come to Florida to smoke a cigaret? Come on man, they have been eliminated by the Bolts in the previous play-off, this is better than a stat as argument! You can take trends from covers and put 100 lines, it doesn't matter. One more thing, I have nothing to learn from you and your picks but you are now a little bit aggressive cause you took my previous comment as an aggression but it was just a remark. So, stop the cola and accept argumentation and recommendation, I don't want to place a bet in your place, I just tell the rest of the forum who will jump on the Bolts when they will see the trends you added... So, I repeat, you play what you want but when you paste a few statistics, try to add the injured players "Key players for the Bolts for this example" and the fact that the Rangers have been eliminated by the Bolts. One more thing, if your picks is only based on trends, I don't want to be your bankroll... The goal is making money together. That's my vision of the betting. |
joepecsi | 56 |
|
|
@Pepsi,
You wrote this: you better go and get some lessons from the best ?? Man, do you watch NHL games a part take trends from covers? Did you watch Bolts games without these 5 guys? Do you think that the Rangers will come to Florida to smoke a cigaret? Come on man, they have been eliminated by the Bolts in the previous play-off, this is better than a stat as argument! You can take trends from covers and put 100 lines, it doesn't matter. One more thing, I have nothing to learn from you and your picks but you are now a little bit aggressive cause you took my previous comment as an aggression but it was just a remark. So, stop the cola and accept argumentation and recommendation, I don't want to place a bet in your place, I just tell the rest of the forum who will jump on the Bolts when they will see the trends you added... So, I repeat, you play what you want but when you paste a few statistics, try to add the injured players "Key players for the Bolts for this example" and the fact that the Rangers have been eliminated by the Bolts. One more thing, if your picks is only based on trends, I don't want to be your bankroll... The goal is making money together. That's my vision of the betting. |
joepecsi | 56 |
|
|
I'm relax Joepecsi, I just can't understand your picks "today picks".
Rangers eliminated by the Bolts in the previous PO is also an argument to see the Rangers continue their streak... A few revenge will be present tonight.
|
joepecsi | 56 |
|
|
@Joepecsi
No Johnson, no Palat, no Paquette, no Callahan, no Drouin. A part Stamkos and Kucherov, the rest is wind... Of course, you have reason for the stats BUT, playing Tampa Bay without these 5 guys is a risk. The value is on the Rangers. Without Parise for the Wild, Boston just lost against the Sharks, even without Miller, don't forget that Parise is the heart of this team and Dubnyk never won against the Bruins in 4 stars in career... Can't understand your picks of the day even if I respect them. ^^ Same thing for the Ducks, Boudreau will be fired soon, it is a risk to play them for the moment cause the Luongo's last start was brillant against the Bolts and the Cats have a lot of talented forwards and young players and with Barkov back, it is a plus value on the top line. |
joepecsi | 56 |
|
|
Amazing RLeith
|
RLeith35 | 19 |
|
|
A's @ Dbacks over 8 @1.69 (Pinnacle)
2 pitchers from the league triple A who have bad stats cause Brooks shows a BA of .444 against righties and Chasin earned 3 run against the Cards but he will face another offensive which is much better! Brooks shows an ERA of 48.60 on road "lol" and he just replaces Hellickson in the rotation and he will return to the minor league when Hellickson will be back and same thing for Chasin who replaces Doubront. I don't see any trape in this game cause both pitchers are struggling and both offenses are hot. 10 runs Yersterday with Gray and Anderson on the mound, 2 digits for this game too. bet-clever.com
|
bet-clever | 1 |
|
|
Over OK
bet-clever.com
|
bet-clever | 3 |
|
|
Red Sox @ Mets over 6 @1.65 (1xbet)
Ortiz back in the line-up. Mets last 10 games => 9 over / 1 under and Owens will face a very hot bat. Red Sox still a dangerous team even for Harvey who is terrific but Red Sox is .263 against right handed pitcher. |
bet-clever | 3 |
|
|
Easy bet.
Cheers guys!
|
bet-clever | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.