Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by jrgumpert: 70% of the public is on the Over, what could possibly go wrong? That means nothing grump.
|
SettleDownSpaz | 9 |
|
|
Sorry to see that. Good luck regardless.
|
rod_steel | 3 |
|
|
Not only should you not hedge out, I'd recommend doubling or tripling down (well just kidding about the last part). Even if they get blown out next game, both UNC and Zaga are two of the softest #1 seeds in recent memory. While Oregon is far from unblemished, at least you will go down with a team with a hell of a lot of scrap, two stone cold clutch trigger men in Dorsey and Brooks, and the best coach left in the tournament. I too have a bet on Oregon but only at 18-1 and to hell if I'm going to hedge now. Good luck to us.
|
DukeTrinity11 | 31 |
|
|
It would be great to hear your rationale on these games. I only agree on one and I'd love to hear the other side of the argument. Good luck.
|
VegasVandal | 9 |
|
|
Hoyer +5 would be nice. Isn't Matt Barkley next up on the chopping block?
|
ryder004 | 13 |
|
|
I'm not upset, but to accuse a longtime and respected poster of selling out or giving out losers on purpose is an offensive thing to say and just plain wrong.... especially since if you've looked at his plays as you've said, he was on an absolute heater a week and a half ago that far outweighs any of his current losses.
|
max58 | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by B00kieKiller: i think max sold or is giving out losers on purpose. he never picks public favorites before. but look at his recent picks. Are you serious? I guess you either weren't around the week prior to last when Max was doling out favorite winner after winner after winner during conference championship week... notice how he's toned down his number of selections considerably? That's what good players do when they're losing and they maximize gains when they are winning. I hope you are just young and ignorant and not just a grown-up half-wit crybaby. |
max58 | 15 |
|
|
Anyone have these stats or know where to find them? My search is providing zilch...
|
bushman9 | 1 |
|
|
Any NBA tonight French?
|
CrazyFrenchman | 31 |
|
|
I have many questions for you French but I will spare you the time... Congrats you are a great capper, I wish you posted more often.
|
CrazyFrenchman | 34 |
|
|
I hope you're right.
|
PhillyBrown | 4 |
|
|
We think alike.
|
PhillyBrown | 4 |
|
|
Yes
|
estes1717 | 21 |
|
|
replied to
I though about it all week and I have a play on the Panthers at Giants. Comprehensive write-up.
in NFL Betting
Way to go scal, you're capping has been quite strong
|
scalabrine | 60 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jose_Reyes: Like Cleveland and Oakland, too. Good to see ya bushman. Happy Holidays. Happy holidays JR, our Mets almost did it friend.... Cam someone talk me out of putting 2 units on the Browns ml +800?
|
bushman9 | 22 |
|
|
Keep it up Skins
|
bushman9 | 22 |
|
|
Good point Alvaro, I misspoke and was referring to the entire team not just the defense. Good luck today everyone.
|
bushman9 | 22 |
|
|
Chargers- liked this a lot more when it was a shorter line and locked this one in at -1. Dolphins sure put a lot of emotion and effort in their prime time lose to the gmen last week. Short week, off a loss traveling across country to play a non conference tilt against a team who comes to play when no one believes in them. Never play Rivers as a substantial favorite but trust him as a disrespected favorite or dog. Opener made no sense to me. Chargers defense playing better and team should be playing with some motivation for their fans in what could be their last few games at home is SD.
|
bushman9 | 22 |
|
|
Browns- seachickens are in a historically dangerous position here and covering would be an attempt to overcome the vaunted "Mr. Bator" trend of covering after putting up 30+ while holding opponents to 10 or less for two straight weeks. Worth a look here on that merit alone. Fred Jackson and Bryce Brown step in and try to match the all world production of Rawls and potentially no Kam. Cuastiously optimistic that Manziel is highly motivated here.
|
bushman9 | 22 |
|
|
Raiders- packers back in the good graces of the betting public after a late game drubbing of the cassel led Cowboys. I think there's value at 4 or better, there is still something fundamentally unsound with this packers team and can't be trusted to lay this type of chalk in a tough environment... Rodgers has been under heavy duress this season and it won't be any better for him today with Khalil Mack strapping the cleats up... I see an ugly game here
|
bushman9 | 22 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.