Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hey THEMUGG where are you at? You were quick to laugh when I tried to tell you Denver had the far superior D to Seattle.
I cant recall who did a better job vs Carolina? If you are going to laugh at somebodies post, and be completely wrong. Have the guts to respond. Clown. |
Hugh_Jorgan | 23 |
|
||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Special25: You can like Denver all you want your wager but don't come making excuses about what could have or should have been.denver d vs car d slight advantage to Denver..Denver o vs car o big advantage to Carolina.so yo maybe right Denver has been number 1 all season but Seattle was 2 all season and Arizona was top 5 and Carolina has been top 5. Slight advantage on D? |
mrquija27 | 30 |
|
||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: You laughing now buddy? |
mrquija27 | 30 |
|
||||||||||
Where you guys at?? This game played out EXACTLY as my write out predicted. Michael Oher was a joke. His play directly led to 2 fumbles.
|
mrquija27 | 30 |
|
||||||||||
Cam is much more likely to throw a costly pick than Payton tomorrow. Denver can let their CBs man up the weak Carolina WRs all day. Man the WRs and unleash the hounds. Cam hasnt seen pressure like this all year.Michael Oher is a HUGE weak link, guy stinks on ice these days.
Expecting a big day out of Emmanuel sanders, who is supposed to guard him? |
mrquija27 | 30 |
|
||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Castellani14:
Denver had the number 1 ranked D all year long. And it played without Ware for a good amount. Now that Denver is at full strength, it is easily the best D in the league. Better pas rush than Seattle, better man coverage corners than Seattle. And the Arizona defense isnt even in the discussion. Its posts like yours that make me like Denver even more. And I am rooting for Carolina |
mrquija27 | 30 |
|
||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Special25: All the hype of Denver stout D Seattle was just as good and Arizona was right there as well.then you hear Denver secondary is much better since when Seattle LOB was clearly the best following Arizona.forget about panther D all you want come Sunday you will regret it. Denver had the number 1 ranked D all year long. And it played without Ware for a good amount. Now that Denver is at full strength, it is easily the best D in the league. Better pas rush than Seattle, better man coverage corners than Seattle. And the Arizona defense isnt even in the discussion. Its posts like yours that make me like Denver even more. |
mrquija27 | 30 |
|
||||||||||
Just put $1500 on Denver plus 6. Lets hope Carolina wins by 3, 4, 5, or 6. |
Castellani14 | 14 |
|
||||||||||
Hell yeah!! 9 down, 1 to go. Sitting on Carolina -2.5.
|
Castellani14 | 14 |
|
||||||||||
Just put $500 on team Rice. Lets see how this plays out.
|
Castellani14 | 14 |
|
||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Humchucker:
Yeah I agree...easy to say now of course, but any 10 team parlay that involves a pro bowl game, and the Superbowl conference winner when you don't even know who will be representing each conference seems ill-advised. This has been pointed out numerous times on many threads, but you should never place a parlay with the INTENTION of hedging your last bet. You lose juice since you are essentially betting both sides of the last game/s in your parlay by hedging. I will assume the OP didn't intend to hedge this bet (just a 5 dollar fun bet right?), so in that case, I think hedging is appropriate to get some guaranteed money. Guaranteed money doesn't come free, so you will lose some potential money by hedging, so it won't be maximizing profit, but I think you are okay with that. Here's what I would do for a guaranteed ~720 dollars and no stress. Bet 800 on team Rice +0.5 (if you lose your parlay you are still up 715 dollars). 720 winnings minus 5 dollar initial parlay bet If team Irvin wins, you are now 'down' 800 but have a hedgeable last game. Since it would be worth 2400 (3200 payout minus the 800 you lost on the first hedge) you place a bet on AFC+2.5 for 1680. If your hedge wins (parlay loses), you win 1512 but have to account for initial hedge of 800 so your total profit is 707 (712 profit minus 5 dollar ticket). If your parlay wins, you have 'lost' both hedge bets totaling 2480 but win a 3200 payout for a 720 dollar profit. In summary: If your parlay loses in game 9, you are up 715 If your parlay loses in game 10, you are up 707 (712 winnings minus 5 dollar parlay ticket. I am including the lost initial hedge here) If parlay wins, you lose two hedge bets totaling 2480 but win your 3200 parlay for a total of 720. Just for sake of showing how including those last 2 games in the parlay hurt you...if you had just bet an 8 teamer, it would have been worth ~880, and by having to hedge twice to guarantee yourself the most possible money, it costs you 160 or almost 20%. In deciding if you should hedge, ask yourself this: would I bet 720 dollars on a side in the pro bowl? Because that is essentially what you are doing. A parlay is just rolling bets over into the next selection. By picking a pro bowl side, you are essentially saying when you make the parlay that you are comfortable betting ~800 on that pick since in order for that game to matter you would have to win the first 8 bets. Good luck with whatever you decide to do. I'd take the ~700 guaranteed if I were in your situation but that's just me.
Thank you for taking the time to write that. Really appreciate it. I think It will be wise to take the 700 and run. Ideally the super bowl line will be such that I can hedge and potentially win the hedge and the parlay. But that is wishful thinking. If Arizona is favored by 4over KC or Den I could potentially win both. Could have Arizona -2.5 and KC plus 4. |
Castellani14 | 14 |
|
||||||||||
Thanks for the answers. Much appreciated. In Delaware you can bet parlays at the local bars. I always put in one ten teamer a week. In order to reach ten teams this week I had to throw in the pro bowl and super bowl. |
Castellani14 | 14 |
|
||||||||||
I have a $4 10 team parlay open. It pays out $3200. It is 8 for 8 so far. The two remaining games are team Irvin in the pro bowl -.5 and the NFC in the super bowl -2.5. What would you guys do here to maximize profit? Thanks.
|
Castellani14 | 14 |
|
||||||||||
The line right now is nyg -2, which direction do you guys think the line will go from here?
|
cowboys4949 | 80 |
|
||||||||||
First is Boston. Tampa Bay is just not playing good baseball these days. Only winning 2 out of 10. Boston is playing with a little chip on their shoulder, they would love to hurt Tampa's playoff chances. Give me the hotter team getting +167
Second is Miami, more of a gut call than anything. Atlanta seems like the covers blood bath of the day.
|
Castellani14 | 1 |
|
||||||||||
Thanks for the info, seems like shaktar 1st half seems like a solid play
|
Castellani14 | 6 |
|
||||||||||
Long time, First Time.....
Good morning all... I am fairly new to capping soccer so I have a question for the experienced guys around here. man united 1st half money line at -170, and shaktars is at -165. The over for man united 1st half is 1.5, and shaktar is 1 but the odds are -155. So those odds show bookie are expecting a 1st half goal in each game. Do you think given this information, that Man United and shaktar first half moneyline are good bets? What are the up and downsides to first half bets that you guys have seen in the past? |
Castellani14 | 6 |
|
||||||||||
Anybody have one that works? firstrow sports isnt working
|
Castellani14 | 2 |
|
||||||||||
anyone know where to find this game online? It seems all the major sites do not have it.
|
Castellani14 | 3 |
|
||||||||||
I agree this is total b.s. there are only 8 golfers. How hard can it be to see everyones shots
|
blairaj | 2 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.