Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lost 7 of 8 and now the line goes down from 5 to 3.5 at Richmond. Seems a little suspect. I grabbed it at +4 and sprinkled some on the ML. No specific reason for the pick, other than it fits what I like. Reverse movement against a public fave for a struggling team.
When a line stinks...go towards the smell! GL to all
|
Chigambler | 1 |
|
|
Thanks bluecobalt! Already posted my rant to my League on Yahoo, but had to share this story on here. Unbelievable!
|
Chigambler | 3 |
|
|
Just had the Niners D lead me to a half point victory in the Championship with the Pick Six followed by the interception of that hail mary to end it. Play almost didn't happen. Atl was lining up to kick FG...Harbaugh timeout...pick off the hail mary to give me the win. Last game of the week...last play of the game...on a play that almost didn't happen...only made possible by a pick six a minute earlier! My boys will never hear the end of this from me. The money's nice, but the trash talkin is what its all about #Flutiesgotnothingonmyfflsquad
|
Chigambler | 3 |
|
|
Spartans are dominating on D...as usual. Nebraska had one TD on a busted coverage. Other than that, not much. Now they're down 13 and a re forced to try to thro in the 2h with their beat up O line. Think smarty increases their lead and wins easily.
|
Chigambler | 2 |
|
|
Have no fear. Riverside down 8 at half, but Pepperdine shot 6-8 from three and 55% from the field in 1H. Gotta think they'll come back down to Earth. Adding a little more
UCRiverside -1 2H. |
Chigambler | 3 |
|
|
Adding Southern Miss 2H +2. Up 5 at half, think they win this game and maintain this lead. Watched first half and the better team is ahead right now. Might live in Chicago, but no homer pick on DePaul here. I'll wait til their catching 20 points in conference play later this year ; )
|
Chigambler | 3 |
|
|
Take the home team. UC Riverside +1. Free throw shooting will improve at home. Pepperdine beat up on the sisters of the poor in their first game. Like the home dog (if +1 counts for that)
GLTA! |
Chigambler | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ufcchamp200: i hate these shitty teams that are losing by 4 TDS.......they always score on the last drive of the game and then celebrate like they won something. They covered. That = Win for an 0 for the season team. |
mr_bollox | 238 |
|
|
...never a doubt!
|
mr_bollox | 238 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Chigambler: Stanford has a tough, experienced D. They're at home, and have an offense that can grind clock and keep Mariota off the field. I think Stanford covers, and also keep it close enough to ruin teasers, too. Lose by 4 or less, maybe even win. I'm taking Stanford, 1Q, 1H, Game, with a small bet on 1H and game ML's. This is the matchup that Vegas will use as their "net" to catch all the fish. Leaning Baylor to blow out Okie...but haven't acted on that one yet. Is this not good enough for posting winners?
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374: Nice wins. But trust me, no one wants to see your card AFTER the fact. Then read my posts before I bet, luchadork! The only thing I didn't mention before the fact were the teasers...but that's bc I'd like to keep some credibility and not let everyone know I'm a true degenerate!
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
Let me tell you little story bout a man named...Winner!
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
INTERNET / -1Ticket #:62246593
Nov 07 09:00 PM CFB STRAIGHT BET [3114] 1Q STANFORD +3EV 500 / 500 500 WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:01 PMINTERNET / -1Ticket #:62246592 Nov 07 09:01 PM CFB STRAIGHT BET [1114] 1H STANFORD +6½-110 550 / 500 500 WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:01 PMINTERNET / -1Ticket #:62246629 Nov 07 09:01 PM CFB STRAIGHT BET [1114] 1H STANFORD +250 200 / 500 500 WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:02 PMINTERNET / -1Ticket #:62246591 Nov 07 09:01 PM CFB STRAIGHT BET [114] STANFORD +10½-105 525 / 500 500 WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:01 PMINTERNET / -1Ticket #:62246628 Nov 07 09:01 PM CFB STRAIGHT BET [114] STANFORD +350 200 / 700 700 WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:02 PMINTERNET / -1Ticket #:62246755 Nov 07 07:36 PM Nov 07 07:33 PM Nov 07 09:01 PM CFB CFB CFB 3TEAS FB 10, 10½, 11 NBA 8, 8½, 9 CBB 7, 7½, 8 PTS [110] BAYLOR -5-105 (B+11) [112] UL LAFAYETTE -3-105 (B+11) [114] STANFORD +21½-105 (B+11) 700 / 500 500 WIN WIN WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:04 PMINTERNET / -1Ticket #:62247992 Nov 07 07:33 PM Nov 07 09:01 PM Nov 07 09:01 PM CFB CFB CFB 3TEAS FB 10, 10½, 11 NBA 8, 8½, 9 CBB 7, 7½, 8 PTS [112] UL LAFAYETTE -4-105 (B+10) [114] STANFORD +20½-105 (B+10) [114] TOTAL u71½-105 (B+10) (OREGON vrs STANFORD) 600 / 500 500 WIN WIN WIN WIN 11/07/2013 02:28 PM |
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
Thanks everybody! Just got back from a night out at the bar's in Chicago watching these winners roll in! Great night! Trees win...now u
I'm smoking some tree to celebrate!
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
Love seeing more quality cappers on the trees tonight. Go Stanford!
|
instinctpicks | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt: Chigambler, I agree with your premise, but keep in mind Green Bay ML was -480 and approximately 80% of all the side money was counting on the Pack to cover… The money the Wise Men in Vegas raked in from that deal they can afford to lose two weeks in a row…
On
the other hand, I think Minnesota and Troy covers tonight which will cushion the hit they take
on Oregon… Best of luck tonight my friend… Thanks for your insight. Have to disagree on GB outcome and it's affect on tonight's line. These were posted well before Rodgers was injured in the 1Q of that game. If the "wise men in Vegas" knew that was going to happen, than they're not just sharp, they've got a Delorean and are friends with Doc Brown!
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
Agree on both. Bigger on Stanford for me. GL!
|
Metallica2467 | 21 |
|
|
Would rather put "too much" thought in this game than just blindly follow all the fish who say Oregon blows out everyone, revenge, BCS, etc. I gave reasons for my pick. Home team, veteran D, style of play.
I've even heard people mentioning long grass to slow down Oregon?!?! The most important element is the style of play. Last year Stanford dominated T.O.P. they grind out possessions, run the ball and keep that high flying offense off the field. They are clearly the best team the Ducks have played so far, on the road, and they play the perfect style to counter what Oregon wants to do. Stanford keeps it close, and in the process proves to everyone that Bama would destroy Oregon using this same game plan with far superior athletes than Stanford can put on the field.
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stat13: Because books need both dogs tonight, both are SUPER high profile games and the plain fact that you hardly EVER see two high-profile, high chalks cash on weeknight games because the books are TOO GOOD. You ask why can't both big chalks cover on the same night? They could, just like you or I could hit the powerball. There's a chance both chalks hit tonight, but there's no way I'm betting my $ that the books go 0-2 on the sides. At best the chalks go 1-1 tonight, and there's a better chance of one of the dogs winning outright than the chalks going 2-0. Stats. Nice points. And great profile pic. Bill the Butcher one of my all time faves. Can't believe same guy played Lincoln! DDL is the best actor on the planet...and back to the point of this thread, Stanford still gonna cover!
|
Chigambler | 34 |
|
|
If its 46% to cover, wouldn't simple math say to take the 54% side...or not bet???
|
johnbkearney | 15 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.