Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chargers ML +135 1 Unit.....
They're rumored to be leaving SD... they may need to get their fans something to cheer for to increase ticket sales. I think Tennessee is likely to rest most of their good players... If mariota plays, I'd be surprised if he plays more than 1 series. Yeah, these reasons are quite suspect, but give me a coin flip, and I'll take +juice any day.
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 3 |
|
|
1-1 +0.30 Units
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 3 |
|
|
Cleveland ML +100
Detroit ML +130 Both teams need to show their fans they won't suck even though they might. They are playing teams that WON'T take any chances in preseason. 1 Unit each BOL
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 3 |
|
|
Montreal Lost ........ I'm now 3 - 2 ........ +3.15 Units
I don't like much the rest of the week.
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 6 |
|
|
I'll be on the ML Montreal tonight. BOL dudes! :D
1/2 Unit |
CJT_Super_Glide | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Wow Supe,.....the amazin' Alouettes at Number 3? You are a better man than me to see that. I'm hoping they start playing like it, at least for this week. Hopefully it comes in
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 6 |
|
|
Greetings, dudes.........
Here's my rankings using my (TO Usage, Sacks, Sacks Allowed, Point Differential) metric, after 7 weeks....... 1. Hamilton 2. BC ------------------------- 3. Montreal 4. Ottawa 5. Calgary 6. Toronto ------------------------- 7. Winnipeg 8. Edmonton 9. Saskatchewan *The metric uses all 7 weeks of data....QB changes , like Matt Nichols, need to be taken into consideration. Looking at the games this week, I like only one, but we'll have to see a line.... Montreal |
CJT_Super_Glide | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by suuma: I don't think believe they will underperform, I believe they will perform to their standards because they OVERperformed last season. Short version: Carolina overperformed by 3.9 estimated wins (football outsiders) and 2.6 pythagorean wins. They had a record of 7-1 in close games and a turnover differential of +20. They had the easiest schedule in 2015. You always have to adjust a team's performance to the average situation and the average schedule. Regression madness. |
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
Okay..... So why do you believe the panthers will underperform?
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: Thanks CJT!!! Good luck this week! You have a lot of discipline that is real good !!!! Thanks, man. It's been a tough habit to develop. I'm rollin' with Ottawa only this weekend. I had one play in MLB yesterday, today I've got two.
|
spottie2935 | 44 |
|
|
Hey nice hit on Winnipeg last night ...... I stayed away from Hamilton because of that new quarterback that they put into their lineup .... nice job to us both.
|
spottie2935 | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Also, when a home non divisional favorite lost last week as a home favorite despite being up at half time, they are 6-1 ATS after that loss....fitting Ottawa again. p:HFL and p:M2>0 and HF and not DIV Ottawa was the only one I liked anyhow... my numbers have Ottawa as the #4 team in the CFL and Edmonton as the #9, worst team to bet on. Thanks - this confirms my only play for the week that I can see at this point.
|
spottie2935 | 44 |
|
|
Excellent..... I'm wondering which two or three they'll be wrong about this year in their top 6..... I think Cincinnati is lookin' to play their hearts out and win at least one playoff game this year.... I wouldn't be surprised if we saw Cardinals Bengals Super Bowl
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
Last year everyone was all over the Philadelphia Eagles nuts..... As it turned out they stunk
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
I just saw ESPN post the NFL Power Rankings going into the season of 2016......
Does anyone remember or can anyone find what the power rankings were for the top 10 teams going into the season last year....? I ask because it might be good fade material. CjT |
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
I hear ya loud and clear......
I do the same thing in College Football.... I try to stick to 2-3 conferences as go to plays.... I used to do Big Ten and Mac when lived in Chicagoland.... now I do both of those, but I've added in Pac 12. Thanks for the support and comments.
|
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
IMO, point differential with turnover usage should measure their offense at least sufficient enough..... Less is more when using a metric.... But I'd say a minimum of two stats to come up with one. .
What do you think of Burris this coming week ????? Or is he back on the bench? |
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
Hey Spottie....
thanks for your posts....... I've posted how my metric has ranked the teams going into week 7.... I only have to possible plays at this point... Hamilton would be a play according to my numbers, but Winnipeg is using a new pumped up QB - he seems on a mission. I'll probably not bet this game. The other play I may do is Ottawa since my numbers are showing that Edmonton is the worst team in CFL. I feel like I may take this on as home teams should catch up a little at some point.... this is a rebound spot for Ottawa, but then again, if they're starting burris again, I may not play this one either. IDK
|
spottie2935 | 44 |
|
|
Using Point Differential, Sacks, Turnover Usage......
Here's your CFL rankings.... Hamilton BC Montreal Ottawa Toronto Calgary Saskatchewan Winnipeg Edmonton |
CJT_Super_Glide | 9 |
|
|
+1 unit
+3.65 units...... 3-1 |
CJT_Super_Glide | 6 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.