Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
You should see if Covers can change your name to:
Follow "TO" Fail |
FollowOrFail | 67 |
|
|
Always wondered.. is that you in your avatar ?
|
Force | 27 |
|
|
Portland had a few easy teams they were able to battle through their injuries with (Bulls and Hawks) now their deficencies are starting to inevitably show. Detroit had the big men to exploit the loss of Nurkic, Minni has KAT and has played very well at home this year (24-13) compared to Portland's .500 road record.
Add in the fact the Wolves haven't had to travel and they have a good shot at winning this game. One could argue that Minni is dealing with their own injuries but look at the GSW game, all the same guys were out.
|
fishmac | 7 |
|
|
Doin it for Nipsey
|
chauwagerline | 7 |
|
|
Each game is completely independent from the other, 20 dogs could cover in a row and the next game would have an equal 50-50. Statistics grade 9 lmao.
|
yungcapper | 4 |
|
|
They "deserve" or not **
|
gamblorman | 10 |
|
|
These "losers" are the top percentile in the entire world at what they do which enables them to provide for their family and loved ones and do whatever tf they want.
You are a degenerate trying to make money off a team who has lost to Lebron 28 times in a row. Talking about what the "deserve or jot lmfao. Shut your trap , loser
|
gamblorman | 10 |
|
|
Clearly someone doesn't know what tf they are talking about, thank you gentlemen. Where would one locate such information ?
|
Es-P | 7 |
|
|
created a topic
Anyone know the ATS stat for double digit faves in the NBA this year?
in NBA Betting
Yesterday I read somewhere that double digit favorites in the NBA are only covering around 35-40% can anyone confirm this or know where to find this information ?
|
Es-P | 7 |
|
|
What scares me about taking OKC is the fact that their offense has been struggling lately and Indy is a defensive team who get back Collison tonight. They live off their D, and Collison might give them that extra boost on O that makes the difference in covering the spread.
On the other side, OKC's last game outside of Schroder the entire team played poorly against the Grizzlies. Westbrook shot 30% and even tho PG put up 30pts he did it at a 33% clip, not very efficient considering both of them logged heavy minutes. This sets up a classic turn-around game for them in front of their home crowd. Line is right where it should be, add in revenge factor gun to my head Im still taking PG and Westbrook for the bounceback at home -6.5 as this Indiana team likes to turn it down on the road.
|
masterkush | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by frankzen44: with all due respect, your record is still incorrect. 27.01, record going in: 215-184, then you go 1-3, new record 216-187 (but you updated it as it was a 0-1 day) 28.01, record going in 216-187, you go 2-1, new record 218-188 29.01, record going in 218-188, you go 1-2, not 2-2, new record 219-190 your record is 219-190 i am not counting your props or totals (whenever you win a prop bet, you mention that those are making you money, but your total bets were horrible and you are never mentioning them or keeping track of those bets. also, your prop bet record is not updated correctly either. earlier this season you used to say *i think i am x-x on prop bets, and then all of the sudden you had a precise record, which was, of course, incorrect). since the begining of the season, you failed to update your record correctly 9 times (not counting the props), every time in your favor, mostly forgetting a loss or two. Woah.. someone needs to get a fking life LOL
|
ragingstorm | 24 |
|
|
Ur team is the warriors and u are wrong almost everytime. Dammn
|
TreyInventor | 29 |
|
|
Whyd u stop posting your record as the title of ur daily threads ?
|
Kuzllard00 | 27 |
|
|
Rage my man keep it moving keep on succeeding keep on making money consistently in this game where 97% cannot.
Long time follower, don't waste your time with these bums!
|
ragingstorm | 23 |
|
|
replied to
GucciCapper should know better to back these guys again...Can GucciCapper finally cap a Knicks game?
in NBA Betting
Where is Korean MILFs child at all the time lmao
|
GucciCapper | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: You know what else is funny? How last year the majority of people in this country thought a backup QB couldn’t get his team to the championship game let alone beat the best QB ever in the Super Bowl. It’s the NFL and teams play one week a certain way and another week a completely different way. ANYBODY who bases a teams chances off of one bad game or one great game is an amateur. You say the bears can’t go into NO or LA and best them? Why not? I’m not saying the Bears will do it but to think they can’t because it’s not what the majority or experts think....come on. Spot on
|
bearsfan111 | 26 |
|
|
I agree.
Add in the fact that they beat Steelers last week and Cinci getting blown out at home.. Dont think Driskel is much of a dropoff from how Dalton's been playing this year.
|
bmiller1632 | 5 |
|
|
Darn that line is jumping a lot , its scaring me. Too late to cancel my bet but Im seeing Hou up to -3.5 now.. unfortunately had to lock in SA +2.5 before book closed.
|
LeagueCapper | 20 |
|
|
I can't believe this thread is already on the 5th page. AllDay just gave you guys some valuable info..
Chicago covered 1h, FG and 2h. Pay attention !! Thus combined with the Over trend on the night game are huge !!
|
AllDay51 | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter: Strange... Posted this on the 21st and didn't know Alex Smith was not playing for Washington at QB... You guys are idiots. The whole reason he's bringing up Alex Smith is that people are putting too much emphasis into him being out, when in reality McCoy isn't much a downgrade as most perceive. I rarely post, but man I see you in a lot of threads being annoying AF. Your life must be extremely exciting.
|
LeagueCapper | 54 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.