Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by DoctorRonald: Wishing I got in on the over at 209 cause my book has 212 now yeahit hasn't been 209 for a long time...don't know how he got that line at the time of his posting??
|
ff99l1 | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jordyn31: Cleveland -6 Houston -5 Posting now as line is moving GL I take it you are buying points for both games as those are not the lines anymore ....don't think Houston was ever down to -5
|
jordyn31 | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by plays4all:
It wasn't his pick...so it doesn't count toward his pick record which he is keeping separate. I understood what he meant. I've been following rolex closely. he said HE put a grand on the the game ...I would say that means HE bet A thousand on the game..,.who the fu.. cares who he followed in making the pick!!!....read what he said..... HE BET A G on the game .....do you UNDERSTAND THAT.......HE PLAYED THE GAME FOR A G and LOST...... it was his G he lost....are you BRAIN DEAD or is there something you don't UNDERSTAND!!!......who he followed is insignificant ..he made the bet and HE lost the bet!!!.... you just DONT UNDERSTAND!!!!....philly pointed this out to him and he just wrote it off like he never lost a grand!!!.....this guy knows crapola about the nba!!!! |
Rolexsports | 48 |
|
|
rolex....you sure enjoy offending people don't you??......you sound very immature to me...someone who needs recognition and tries to find it on the internet.....must have been kicked around by all the bullies when you were younger...or perhaps you still are a little child making up stories and sneaking in to use mommy and daddy's computer when they are not at home to make these postings!..........I do really feel sorry for people like you!.....have a good trip to Switzerland....do you pay for that with your monopoly money you get for christmas!!!....hahahahaah1
|
Rolexsports | 48 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rolexsports: GD I don't run from anything slim. If you want to add the Bucks pick to my record than go ahead if it makes you feel good . I'm not. Everybody else good luck on on the Cavs and read the thread , I need 2-3 for the first game to be successful. And the G I lost is only a fraction of what I'm up this year a small fraction . My max wager is 3,500. why would it make me feel good to see somebody loose a grand on the game..sorry you lost a grand.......I didn't lose the grand....you did......and you didn't post the loss on your record as philly pointed out....I just agreed with philly....you said in your thread you didn't post any plays ...but you did...... saying you played Milwaukee for a g......that's all philly pointed out and you jump all over a decent respected capper like philly who adds a lot to this forum,,,,,,,that was my point when you start a tread on this forum...you should expect comments and replies......both positive and negative....and when you make a mistake man up to it .
|
Rolexsports | 48 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PhillyBrown: You posted Bucks ML yesterday actually. I know you said it was a tout pick but it was clear you were taking it. Just sayin he posts milw-130 for a g ......and then he tells philly to stay out of his thread!!! rolex be a man about it ...he said you posted it and you did!!...and you lost!!!....in black and white!!...so you are 8-6!!.....fess up admit you lied !!...its right there in front your face!...why jum on the guy when it is a fact!
|
Rolexsports | 48 |
|
|
just betting fav's is gonna put you in one BIG hole I'm gonna bet the dogs again tonite and ride the MONEY train!!!
|
CrazyMilkMan | 7 |
|
|
do you ever post your picks with the real lines at the time of your postings?....the lines you use are always 1-2 points better than whats out there
|
Beningo88 | 5 |
|
|
just keep fading your picks can make a guy rich!
|
ProudJagsfan | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan: Guys, i'm on a trial run for some guys and i'm making picks everyday for them and here's what I sent them for tomorrow. I totally take the blame for Purdue last night. Kansas just blew my guys out of the water. They played outside themselves and I can't cap that kind of statistically deviant explosiveness. Good job Kansas backers. Wisconsin is primed for a let-down after coming back from a late seven point deficit to dethrone the defending national champions. Wisconsin had matched up really well with Villanova. Wisconsin tends to beat teams when they 1) control tempo and 2) dominate the interior. So far in the tourney, Wisconsin has faced teams against which they were able to do both. Villanova also likes to play at a snails-pace. Villanova is also soft in the interior. So Wisconsin had their way in the interior, shooting 20/31 from inside the arc, and played at a tempo favorable to them, and won. Likewise in their first round against, Tech, who was playing without their forward who specializes in defensive rebounding Chris Clarke, Wisconsin had 9 more rebounds and won by 10. Without their center Egbunu, Florida must surely look like a team whom Wisconsin can bully in the interior and so find success against like Villanova? Both teams play great defense. Regarding offense, Florida is indeed a team that Wisconsin can easily defend in the half court. Florida's 3 point % is 116th and their 2 point % is 101st. However, Florida's offensive efficiency is 26th. The Gators rely on getting in transition--on forcing turnovers and pushing the pace. To push the pace is key against Wisconsin. Then it does not matter that Egbunu is injured. Michigan State provided the template for this when they beat Wisconsin at home by 10 points without having a backcourt of nearly the same quality as Wisconsin. Florida is great at forcing turnovers, their defense is 32nd in the country in this category and Wisconsin has not been secure with the ball as of late. Part of the reason for their recent problems is their lack of experience in conference play playing teams who are strong in forcing turnovers. Their Big 10 opponents generally rank towards the bottom half in the NCAA at forcing turnovers. In Wisconsin's loss against Michigan they had 15 turnovers. In their recent win against Villanova, they had 14 turnovers. Villanova, because they play at a slow tempo, did not so much punish Wisconsin for their turnovers. But Florida will. They forced 11 turnovers from Virginia (an inflated number given the low quantity of possessions in that game), who is 18th in offensive turnover %, 17 from East Tennessee State and I expect their defense to achieve a similar feat against Wisconsin. Despite Egbunu's absence, Florida still has the length in the interior to compete on the boards. The last time that they were out-rebounded was at Kentucky on February 25 and the 20 missed threes might have had something to do with the rebounding differential. I think Florida can compete with Wisconsin in terms of physicality and outclass them in terms of athleticism. I think they can get enough turnovers to ignite their transition game and generally maintain a fast pace in order to score enough on Wisconsin so that they don't miss Egbunu on the inside. Give me Florida -1.5! UNC has consistently struggled away from home against the better defensive teams. On the road against teams in the top 50 in defensive efficiency UNC is 1-6 ATS in its last 7. I expect this trend to continue against Butler. 8 points is a lot to give a battle-tested Butler who beat the defending champions twice, Xavier home and away, Marquette home and away and Seton Hall on the road. Butler has proven to hang with the best away from home. One can justifiably raise a concern against the UNC's rebounding prowess. UNC is arguably the best rebounding team in the nation and Butler is one of the nation's worst rebounding teams. However, rebounding has not been a decisive factor in these affairs. They out-rebounded Georgia Tech, Virginia and Duke in the ACC tournament and still lost. They were actually outclassed in the interior in their losses against Miami and Duke in conference play. Whether UNC's rebounding corps underachieves or is consistent, the only time that they have covered in their last 7 against top 50 defenses was fresh in their first tourney game against a tired Miami squad who had just won a thriller the day before against Syracuse. Butler, on the other hand, has handled statistically superior rebounding squads away from home--for example, Seton Hall is 14th in total rebounding and Xavier 62nd. So, I don't think rebounding will be decisive in this matchup. I think Butler's defense will be the key. I like Butler's stingy defense, offensive efficiency and superior ball security to help them control the slow tempo that they prefer. However, even if the tempo becomes fast, Butler has beaten the team in its conference most similar to UNC in terms of tempo and offensive efficiency--Marquette home and away. In sum, whereas Butler has successfully dealt with the kinds of weapons that UNC can bring to the table---rebounding, tempo, offensive efficiency and defensive efficiency (Villanova is 11th in this last category)--UNC has consistently struggled to deal with the strength that Butler possesses--efficient defense. UNC is fortunate to have scraped by Arkansas and they might not be so lucky against a team with a coaching staff who can do a better job guiding them down the stretch. So give me the road-tested and defensively-minded team to cover the large point spread. Give me Butler +8! you got your butt kicked BIG TIME with those picks!!!
|
ProudJagsfan | 57 |
|
|
Wisconsin having a "let down" game is totally ASSININE!!!...badgers roll Friday ....experience IS the key to this game....they have been at the door the last four years...its natl title game this yea.....take Wisconsin in this one!!!...fla way to inconsistent to keep the badgers from elite eight and eventually final four!!
|
ProudJagsfan | 57 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VTHokies1888: Adding- Colorado State -4 (1.5U) Degenerate game out west, I like them at home though... Bakersfield won't shoot like they did @Cal. you are right on that point....they shot even better!!...unreal! I lost my butt on Colorado state, too!!
|
VTHokies1888 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by UglyKidJoe: I watch women's basketball and I enjoy it. I imagine that they're playing naked and I'm up standing in front of my TV rooting, "Hell Yea!" sounds like the kind of guy who waks off during games
|
Hoyasaxa | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: I think you're both lying. No one watches that crap. I'm not complaining about it being on, I just know people don't watch it. Maybe if they wore volleyball style uniforms but that'll never happen. men should be able to do interviews in the locke rrooms after games to!!!...maybe even do interviews "during" showers too!!! IM ALL FOR MENS EQUAL RIGHTS!!!!!!!
|
Hoyasaxa | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: That's what makes tourney time great. I like Oakland a lot but if you're gonna drop one to Youngstown, a team they more or less blew out twice, then you get what you get. Probably an NIT bid but we'll see. they will be more competitive in the NIT anyways.
|
Hoyasaxa | 25 |
|
|
that is why it is called march madness!!
|
Hoyasaxa | 25 |
|
|
most WOMEN don't even enjoy watching womens hoops!!!! why they force us to put up with womens basketball I will never know!! ALL these great mens basketball games are going on and espn is covering all this womens crapola!!.......just cant see it!!!!!
|
Hoyasaxa | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by r_mongoose: YOU WANT SOME UPSET TEAMS, HERE IT IS MIN +8.5 BK + 11 CHI +1.5 THERE ARE YOUR UPSETS FOR TOMORROW !! GL if those are nba games ...you are in the wrong forum pal....this is a college basketballforum....not NBA!
|
KK1 | 15 |
|
|
only problem is that liberty --3.5 or - 4.0.....where do you see -3!!
|
SystemStan | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gd2436:
nice write up....my thoughts exactly.......obviously this rookie prospect doesn't know what he's talking about and surely he doesn't understand how the horizon league automatic bid to ncaa tourney works .....I think game is a toss up and could go over the total.....I will lay off the game |
Nated843 | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.