Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thanks lad
|
HoosierBettor | 5 |
|
|
Certainly the Toffees are favored for good reason (QPR's away form), but don't be sucked in to the mindless wager of Everton ML. The value in this match is on the Draw +400, in a big way.
QPR have not lacked threats in the danger area in recent games and Everton's back line has been extremely weak. Coming away with a point from Goodison Park would be vital for QPR's chances of staying up, and if they score first I expect they fall into a shell. Plays: Draw +400 - 1 unit BTTS -105 - 1 unit Exact Score 1-1 +850 - half unit Exact Score 2-2 +2400 - quarter unit Good luck! |
HoosierBettor | 5 |
|
|
Tigers ML -170 Rays ML -170 Sox/Sox o7.5 (+115) Parlay it for +442 Bet $50 to win $221 Posted Performance - Up $118.40 on the year. Good luck!
|
HoosierBettor | 1 |
|
|
sounds like a Hammers party to me!!
|
mr_bollox | 16 |
|
|
Add me to the list of the Hammers believers... kind of.
I don't believe that 50 cent premium @+750 for the WH ML is worth it when you can get +700 1H ML on West Ham. I do expect Arsenal to come out sluggish after the emotional win over the weekend and West Ham are in decent form. That is still too risky for me and therefore I'm on draw +400. Good luck.
|
mr_bollox | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Eagles987: like both of first two just not the under I expect reversion to the mean to take place in both Toronto's offense after Sunday's outburst and Hughes' overall performance on the mound so far this season. Toronto reliant on the long ball and with it being literally at freezing temperatures at gametime, I can't imagine there will be many in this game. Both teams in the bottom third in the AL in hits so stringing together singles and doubles to scratch across runs also doesn't seem as likely. That, and I think the general public initial instinct is screaming Over on this game, which is another reason why I lean under. I could also be dead wrong. BOL either way.
|
HoosierBettor | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Blomeuptyron: Please refer a handicapper on this forum, even yourself, thanks in advance. I've done relatively well. I'm not professional by any means but knowledgeable of the game and normally my reads are on, more times than not. I have a 3-game-parlay system, one parlay per day, that generally has odds of +400 to +600. Once I hit a parlay, I scale down risk between 40-50% for amount bet on the next day's parlay due to the unlikely nature of correctly picking 6 straight baseball games' outcomes. The two downsides are that this strategy requires patience as we "expect" to lose at least 2 of every 3 bets we make, hoping to cash in on 1 of 3 or more realistically 1 of 4 at these odds. The other is that I don't have a full writeup for my picks. Frankly, I don't have the time although I do put some time into studying each day. I just recently posted my 3 teamer for today. Hop on board and good luck!
|
Blomeuptyron | 2 |
|
|
Reds ML (even)
Diamondbacks ML (-135) Jays/Twins Under 8 Parlay it for +565 Bet $50 to win 282 Posted Performance -- up $168.40 on the year
|
HoosierBettor | 3 |
|
|
Rangers RL -125 Royals -122 Brewers -110 Parlay it for +525 Bet $50 to win $263 Good luck!
|
HoosierBettor | 1 |
|
|
Could sign*
|
Nba9 | 3 |
|
|
Yeah if he retires maybe then the Warriors could with Shaquille O'Neil. ;)
|
Nba9 | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags: POD: Indians /Sox. Placing another $1100 for a total of 2200/2000. Good luck all. I like the under here too but who do you like on the ML in that Indians/White Sox game? I'm on Tribe -120 as part of my parlay, just curious on your thoughts. Keep up the good work.
|
LB_Dirtbags | 16 |
|
|
1 down and 2 to go thanks to Oakland!
|
HoosierBettor | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags: I'd tease Spurs & Golden State. BOL I did the same thing today 5 pt teased to Spurs +7.5, Warriors -7 @ -130. BOL
|
LB_Dirtbags | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by examine:
you influenced nobody to take them your the only one on them still my rockets bets is way better Nobody took them and the odds were better yesterday when I said they should have... which is why I pointed out sarcastically that they are welcome for my advice. Again, you're welcome. Rockets? To beat Portand, Spurs, OKC, then the Heat? Examine
|
HoosierBettor | 31 |
|
|
I'm on the A's in my parlay and it's not over til it's over, but I like where I'm at. The funniest thing I've read today was the people using the "it's hard to sweep" rationale for why they took the Twinkies today. Also, Pelfrey is trash.
|
lavorat | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by football_007: Value only if it win. If you watch this team play since the trade, you would rather donate that money to charity. The words of an amateur bettor, I see. Value is likelihood of happening vs odds of the bet. And by the way, it is called a futures bet for a reason. Do I care what the Pacers did the last month? Not particularly. I care what they will do in the playoffs with a bet like this. Oh and also, I would agree and admit that the Pacers are not likely to win the title. That's not the purpose of making the bet though. How many people buying UConn futures at 100:1 after they lost by 34 to Louisville received a few weird looks? Again, buy futures when the team is in a lull.
|
HoosierBettor | 31 |
|
|
Bayern +150
Real Madrid +187 Atletico Madrid +500 Chelsea +550 Any thoughts on which might hold the most value? I think I'd have to rule out Chelsea at anything under +800. Unless they draw Atletico in the semis and Hazard is back before the 1st leg, I don't think +550 is worth it. Of course Bayern are the favorite but +150? Seems a little steep. My lean is Atletico +500 especially with Costa back for the semis. Any thoughts? Trying to find a little edge pre-draw if possible. Thanks |
HoosierBettor | 1 |
|
|
Hope all of my good friends on here got Pacers +900 yesterday... it's at +700 (or lower) now. You're welcome!
|
HoosierBettor | 31 |
|
|
bump it up and lets go!
|
HoosierBettor | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.