Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Winner! Now LA...
|
ImNot | 9 |
|
|
I've looking at everyone's topics and I don't see one yankees pick at all. Buerhle lifetime is like 1-9 vs yanks while kuroda is 5-3 with a 3.2 ERA vs Toronto. Buerhle can't win as of late and the yanks get the ball rolling tonight as they have won 6/7 since all star break. Granted it was off the rangers but dig this stat....
Toronto is 4-27 at Yankee Stadium Yankees have a 16 game win streak vs Toronto in da Bronx. This is pretty compelling enough to lay -145 with kuroda right now who is certainly pitching well and comfortable at home. I'm from New York so I am jaded towards the yanks, but I mean come on, numbers don't lie. Buerhle is 0-5 in his last 5 starts, in other words he's shot down! Yanks -145, May drop the hammer on this one folks.
|
ImNot | 9 |
|
|
For the record SAVAGE went to Rutgers, was ousted as QB, than went to Arizona, where he sat out, than left when rich rod came in as coach. Winston is the QB for FSU and the kids been writing plays and studying defense since he was 12. It's all over google how good this kid is. You can't ever lay points with FSU because they are 4-9 ATS last year, and almost always lay down and die sometimes. Pitt has nobody proven anywhere and the FSU o line is too good. Under 24 1st half, and also FSU -10 for the game looks solid. But once again, FSU never covers, but who knows now good this kid is, and how their defense will shut down savage. He's 6-5 and slings.
|
Bankroll2010 | 20 |
|
|
I think it's safe to say that ill never be betting SMU ever again, they are pathetic, and allowed Baker Mayfield a walk on freshmen, to look like
Peyton Manning. On a side note, Gilbert looked like he wanted to go home in the 2nd quarter. What the hell is his problem? You're playing football man not making cupcakes.
|
ImNot | 5 |
|
|
I'm with you on Methodist but ill take the points
|
uclabruins | 5 |
|
|
Methodist + 4...
TTU has a true freshmen QB going, TTU doesn't play defense well ever and Methodist moves the ball quite well. 1-1 in college plays, UNC + 12 really fucked me when Renner tripped on the 1 yard line. Should have been 2-0 with a back door cover. Good luck! Methodist + 4 $330/300
|
ImNot | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BAMA62: GOOD LUCK Thanks def gonna need it
|
ImNot | 4 |
|
|
Giants -173
Bumgardner hasn't been his best lately but the giants are hitting again I'm hoping he can shut down the marlins...or at least hold them while they work on Toehler. Braves -142 Last night was a fluke long ass game especially for Nationals who lucked out with LaRoche stupid homerun in the 15th. Braves all around better team and Teheran bounces back. Gio is a dog for a reason because the braves touch him up. Harvey -141 Got this line early because Stults doesn't strike anyone out and the mets can grind runs off him. I'm hoping Harvey goes back to his ways and shuts down the stupid padres. $200 wins $716 on a parlay. Good luck to me.
|
ImNot | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lazyclouds: Red Sox and under is the play.. Sox yeah. Under you can never tell but lackey is comfy a home. Boston hasn't scored much but they may tit Kuroda today
|
ImNot | 22 |
|
|
Lol nice I'll be there the 3-4-5 for 2mill guarantee...
Yanks might be a trap...
|
pfleet | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bigdave117: Books base their lines on a power rankings kind of system You realize the Red Sox are both at home and far ahead of the Yanks in standings right? You get about +30 for homefield advantage, +40 for how much better red sox have been this year vs yanks and -40 for the Kuroda advantage over Lackey. The line is right I do realize these things. But it still is fishy with the way the yanks can't do anything wrong, and Boston is kinda slumping. Never lost 4 games in a row this season either. 10-0 at home following first home loss.
|
ImNot | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rlovsin17: "@chadnov59: 26-12 last 38 home games 10-0 playing at home after home loss Red Sox haven't lost 4 straight games all year 4-0 after 3 losses" Thank you for this!
|
ImNot | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by devildare: Go with your instinct. And dont double think it Couldn't agree more
|
ImNot | 22 |
|
|
Would still love to know how everyone doesn't see the yanks as a trap at + money. Makes no sense at all.
|
ImNot | 22 |
|
|
I've had a terrible week, I'm 1-5 and the ways I lost could kill even the strongest minded person. For starters, I had the under of 9, in the Yankees Angels game when it was 3-1 in the 8th with 2 outs. The game ended 47-23 thanks to the "lefty specialist" Boone Logan. Somebody through 8 touchdowns in a baseball game. I went on tilt there after and sent it in.
So. With that being said. Why is Kuroda an underdog. Lackey is not all that impressive and the last time these two met at Fenway, Yanks won 5-3. It was 5-1 and 2 late runs surrendered made the game closer than it was. I have no idea why Lackey is -129. I guess the only way to get money on the Red Sox is to make him affordable. Kuroda is + money and it seems so fishy. I also see that EVERYBODY on this site is on the hot yanks and Kuroda. Makes no sense. They blow up Doubront last night who was throwing meatballs at 89, he even looked hurt throwing the ball. I personally feel The yanks at + money is a trap and that the Red Sox play their normal day baseball game. It looks too good to be true. I'm gonna go against everyone in this site, and against my own team and say Lackey is favored because he wins today. Any thoughts are welcome, good luck to all.
|
ImNot | 22 |
|
|
I say we all take the over and the giants for small fun money and laugh if we win!
|
ImNot | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bomboclatt: Imnot Me and you are on the same page ! This equals a high scoring game and San Fran escaping with a win ! Heard it here first I know right? It's like under 6 1/2 and rays is a lock...too easy means a loss
|
ImNot | 32 |
|
|
Makes sense guys thanks for the responses...both of them have been spot on and the under looks like a good play, although I hate playing over unders.
|
ImNot | 32 |
|
|
I've been pretty hot lately...not gonna lie I had the Red Sox big last night and I don't care what anyone says, Felix Hernandez at -106 HASSSS to be a trap, it just so happens that Ryan dempster throws cockshots over the plate and still looks like he belongs on the cubs.
Anyhow I'm 8-2 this week, + $1,311. Bumgardner. Hmmm. He's + money, against a rookie, who is basically unhittable. I am totally confused on this line. Archer shuts almost everyone out, and he's only -121 on my site, or was, and the pubic is riding him big. Whenever shit like this happens it sucks to say but you go the other way. The giants can't hit for shit, which makes this an even funnier line. I'd love to hear some thoughts as to why I shouldn't bet Chris Archer for $500 and laugh while he shuts them down...or does he get hit finally? And Tampa goes back to being that weak team we all know them as...hmmmm Floors open.
|
ImNot | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dduukkee: the pitchers name is stults, if the reds bats werent absolutely terrible lately, i would be on them for sure with this line. but they just cant seem to hit the ball, gl, hope you hit, may lock in under for first 5 last minute capping. Looks like both under and reds...and yeah Stults I'm shot.
|
ImNot | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.