Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Last 7 games, texas scored more than 31 points ONCE |
Mrgohard3 | 20 |
|
|
Curious if this will cause change bear in mind that best 12 teams,could,conceivably put 4-loss team in over 1-loss Indiana types.. This year, it would have been3-loss team |
jimrockford22 | 4 |
|
|
Do transfer portal guts never play? Almost never? I guess nothing outside CFP matters any more.. With 4 team cfp, there was,a gray area with top other bowls |
nfl_brosuf | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
Quote Originally Posted by Damon102: No HC no wr no corner no problems but no QB how are they going snap the ball lol my nanny? Give me Cal Money line….good luck bud. Cal has no QB. UNLV has their starting QB. Only thing good about cal or UCLA are that they don't win games but hang around to eat the spread. I'll take my chance against a team with no starting QB. Game time in 1 hr. I like that spread vs. Moneyline theory |
nfl_brosuf | 23 |
|
|
OP... Interesting,take.. Riley Leonard is,a "gamer" but not prolific passer. Great QB for underdog team |
Lucky Luciano | 19 |
|
|
Huge,indiana fan (personal connection to rourke) Layoff good,and bad Indiana lacks,depth so everyone,healthy and energized is,good Upstart teams,though get,scouted and lose weekly mpmentum Indiana has,ferocious,defense and,didn't,score much later,vs,decent teams So UNDER looks good.. I think in-state nature,favors under too
|
Lucky Luciano | 19 |
|
|
OP, i agreed with you :( |
charlielo55 | 24 |
|
|
UNLV = awesome defensive talent (assuming no,sit-outs/transfers) So UNDER makes tons of sense |
CalBear2009 | 23 |
|
|
Should work fine if bellichek,delegatea,alot.. Should get top,talent... I think this,the new model. Cfb hc is,too many tasks. Need,to delegate alot |
Last2thirst | 54 |
|
|
Whether good or bad, ASU is on an incredible roll rightnow... I think they would be quite competitive with any team Indiana, clemson, SMU and Boise not so much.. Maybe PSU too |
RexR | 12 |
|
|
Just the first round, i believe... So no one has to be visitor to Boise's blue turf |
imaxfli | 9 |
|
|
As mentioned by Underdog, one of the overlooked,factors is,both teams know,the option game and,have,defended it at practices.. And being undersized, they happen to have the right personnel defend,it.other teams,aren't going to change3-4 starters,just for 1 game. Too little practice time and,too disruptive |
JoseAlonso787 | 37 |
|
|
ASU looks,really good Not that impressed with Boise.. Often Jeanty gets,more of his rushing yards in 2nd,half... Too late,vs. Elite team... They did play Oregon tough though
|
Moose1986 | 8 |
|
|
I like UNDER again now that it's 40.5 (havent checked real-time) 28 was too extreme last year.. Probably would have done 31.5 UNDER though |
jimrockford22 | 5 |
|
|
I was wrong... Push last year as army stopped navy at goal line and then took safety on last play.. I believe 28 points 2022 was 20 points at end of regulation.. 37 points at end of OT... Over |
jimrockford22 | 5 |
|
|
Minus 5 seems a bit light.. Although fairly low total |
JoseAlonso787 | 37 |
|
|
I would have loved too see this..not sure it's justified though Over ti.e i'd love to see committee strongly consider a team that has never been in CFP. Ie. Extra weight... Just one possible team though |
Limitlessxp | 28 |
|
|
No idea why thread,posted twice |
jimrockford22 | 5 |
|
|
One more time? I believe the game was,solidly UNDER last year before overtime.. Will check More pep from the offenses this year but i dont think it matters BIG UNDER for me |
jimrockford22 | 1 |
|
|
One more time? I believe the game was,solidly UNDER last year before overtime.. Will check More pep from the offenses this year but i dont think it matters BIG UNDER for me |
jimrockford22 | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.