Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@Fuse
|
Digitalkarma | 93 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DefenseWinsSB:
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma: A record of $185.6 million was bet on the SB in Nevada shattering the previous record set in 2022. How much did the books earn? $6.8 mil , about 3.7% return . It was an increase from the 5.4 mil made last year, 3.6% return in SB57 All in all, the first Super Bowl in Las Vegas is off to a promising start https://twitter.com/howardstutz/status/1757243085665566853?t=xpfHb2BzDOF1jAk8SNKbrg&s=19and all the money was still on the chiefs so that goes to show you they will never lose. I believe they have only lost 2 times on the Super Bowl in the history of superbowls Yep only twice, last time they took a loss was 2008. From what the books were describing early on it sounded like it would be their 3rd time lol but they managed to still scrape some profit overall |
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
@maxwagers781 https://www.boydsbets.com/super-bowl-how-much-bet/ You are correct. @ricraider They've got it down to a science. |
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
@lordbettington It's an estimate for now, I'm sure the analyst may be on to something though. I wonder if some of these losses were also due to the sportsbooks giving away promos bet $20 and get $200 bonus bets etc does that factor in.. Other states haven't reached the maturation point like Vegas has and for some states it's their first time booking the Super Bowl. Id be interested to see how New Jersey or New York officially did their handle should be way bigger than Vegas |
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/GSSSHOW/status/1757076622736581031?t=18nPKB4YG-VIJK0FgGy3-w&s=19
The new logo. Speculate amongst yourselves |
Digitalkarma | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
I would be rather pulling for Lions, Bengals, Texans, Bills, Jaguars or Chargers to win their 1st Super Bowl next year. Oh, didn't I skip the Brownies? They are on my wish list too. Hmm maybe we will have at least one new winner in the next 10 years. Last team was the Seahawks and Saints close together.
|
Digitalkarma | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
@Digitalkarma Yes, Nevada books made $6.8M from SB 58. But DKSportsbook needed San Francisco on the side which did not pan out yesterday, I am not sure that DrafKings is the only book out there needed 49ers yesterday. From the books' perspective, they're happy in the total mix from SB 58. https://twitter.com/BFawkes22/status/1757235716374102163 I think majority of books wanted a 49ers win, probably would have earned more but not as worse as I thought they'd be. I kinda expected them to do alright guess that's 32 out of 34 profitable Super Bowls for nevada. They were happy Kelce did not score a TD or won MVP |
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
I agree with you. I tried to get back into it this season but i just can't. The professionalism of this league is certainly lacking these days. You'll get max effort from college players and women's basketball |
LVRaiders335i | 12 |
|
|
Early futures action liability is on the Chiefs and Niners at the Superbook. Who in their right mind wants to take the Niners again?? Some other teams getting a look: Raiders, Jets and Bengals. Ravens not getting much love due to the odds not being long enough. |
Digitalkarma | 40 |
|
|
@justliketoplay Thanks buddy
|
Digitalkarma | 93 |
|
|
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
||
Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:
@Digitalkarma Hate to play chalk...but like U Conn to repeat..... Interesting choice. Haven't had a repeat winner since Florida almost 20 years ago |
Digitalkarma | 93 |
|
|
A record of $185.6 million was bet on the SB in Nevada shattering the previous record set in 2022. How much did the books earn? $6.8 mil , about 3.7% return . It was an increase from the 5.4 mil made last year, 3.6% return in SB57
All in all, the first Super Bowl in Las Vegas is off to a promising start https://twitter.com/howardstutz/status/1757243085665566853?t=xpfHb2BzDOF1jAk8SNKbrg&s=19
|
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
Didn't see your play but thought about you when OT hit and I'm like surely he played it |
justliketoplay | 82 |
|
|
@DogbiteWilliams
@Macwestie1
@Mcmanus
@KC_4_LIFE
|
Digitalkarma | 93 |
|
|
@Boned860
|
Digitalkarma | 93 |
|
|
Chiefs defense stepped it up as the game wore on. Mike Pennel once again the unsung hero on the dline like that super bowl 4 years ago he helped the run defense. And Nick Bolton too as you mentioned. The key stat is 3rd down defense it has been one of their calling cards this season. The blitz on 3rd downs was effective enough to get the ball out of Purdy's hands quick and disrupt . Didn't really have an answer for it..
Good job |
andarmac99 | 51 |
|
|
The OT prop caused a 7 figure loss for Caesars
|
DogbiteWilliams | 29 |
|
|
@lmb4321
Maybe I'll just put a future down on the Tar Heels. Not sure yet |
Digitalkarma | 93 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
@DogbiteWilliams The books took a historic loss with the Swifties winning this game. The public cleaned up this SB Post #5: https://www.covers.com/forum/nfl-betting-21/got-my-vision-103820035/1#post-131829364 From what Patrick everson is describing that sounds like the books got a swift kick in the nuts . We won't know the full extent until the smoke has cleared |
DogbiteWilliams | 29 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.