Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-video-rulebook/roughing-or-running-into-the-kicker/
1. is incidental to and occurs after the defender has touched the kick in flight If you look at the replay, Sherman touched the ball first, and then tried to veer out of the way. Removing Carpenter for one play was correct, because he tried to ham it up and got the trainers over. The delay of game was atrocious, the ref standing over the ball while the play clock was near zero. But that was the only real error. And incompetent refs don't mean the NFL is rigged.
|
NBA2H | 1 |
|
|
Sherman was actually there first, no? He touched the football. The kicker kicked into him, he didn't run into the kicker. It's the difference between a charge and a block in basketball.
|
porcelainfist | 40 |
|
|
Chan/Chan are a solid if not spectacular pair. But pretty good odds considering this is Hingis/Mirza first go since their split. Although not in the same league, you can check out Nestor/Ropanna split, and then lost 3 straight first rounds when they played again after split.
|
NBA2H | 1 |
|
|
But they bring out the closer to start the 9th. And he retires the side with 2 Ks. What a joke.
|
MoneyTeam99 | 105 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant: no way would the closer come in. Then what's the point of having a closer? |
MoneyTeam99 | 105 |
|
|
5 pitchers and yet no closer. They do have a closer right? And he didn't pitch yesterday?
|
MoneyTeam99 | 105 |
|
|
created a topic
Does anyone know how to get real information on the players' (not official injury) status?
in MLB Betting
For example, I'm listening to the Houston radio broadcast and the guy talks about how all the A's seem to have caught the bug, and how they sent Canha home before/after the first game of the series.
There has to be a reliable source for info like this right? I mean, how often do we come across a hitter in a small slump (or a basketball player in a small slump) only to learn 4 days later that he'd been dealing with a "nagging pain" or whatever?
|
NBA2H | 1 |
|
|
Minny not mommy stupid autocorrect
|
NBA2H | 13 |
|
|
Still feeling pretty good. Mommy scored 70 on 51 percent shooting and 6ers less than 10 pts from covering
|
NBA2H | 13 |
|
|
Funny seeing so many covers posters on Minny.
Bounce back game? Please, this Minny group is so soft. They are still a below .500 team, and have failed to get to .500 in their LAST SEVEN ATTEMPTS. How can any .500 team be a 7 point favorite on the road?! The Wolves are also really bad on the road. Recently, they've lost to both the Celts and the Lakers on the road. Sure the Wolves won last time against the 76ers, but they were also down 19 at the end of the first quarter! You think they can make that kind of comeback on the road? And none of that has even factored in Philly's great play of late. It's not just the scoring. They're the only team so far this year to hold Portland to under 100 points while handing them a loss. The Philly ML offers great value, but the spread is just easy money. The most recent road favorite in the same range was GS@ORL, with a GS team (better than MIN) giving only 6 to an ORL team (worse than PHI). |
NBA2H | 13 |
|
|
The majority (if not all) of posts do seem to be for the Celts. The thing about it is that all of them basically say the same thing: "No Horford? Let's bet the Celts!"
But the Hawks still have Millsap (17.5/8.5), Teague (17/8 with people making the case he should be an all star), and Korver (50% from 3!). Who do the Celtics have? Atlanta is still the better team even without Horford. One of the things not being mentioned is that Atlanta's remaining big 3 finally had a little bit of a breather after three straight OT games where they each played high 30s in minutes (high 40s in Cleveland!). |
armadanation | 6 |
|
|
Record:
ATS 9-7 ML 6-10 +125 It's hard to believe that I've been at this for 17 whole weeks! It's been a fun, if not particularly profitable, ride. I want to thank those who've kept up with this thread, whether you tailed or not. Underdog of the Week: PHI @ DAL Line: DAL +6.5 DAL +230 ML Much of the attention has been on the whole Romo (and Orton) thing, but how come noone talks about these two teams' earlier meeting this season? Foles started that game and they couldn't get anything going. Sure there's no Sean Lee now on Dallas' defense, but Romo didn't play particularly well that game either. While Orton may not be able to lead a huge comeback, he's also been a very consistent player throughout his career. Murray was also not in that first game, and his return will be big for Dallas here in the rematch. If the Eagles can't jump out to a big lead, they could easily be the ones in trouble in a close game late. Interesting Stat of the Week: Over the past 5 seasons, there's been one winner-gets-the-division game each year and they were all won by the home team. This year we have two and the road team is favored in both! |
NBA2H | 49 |
|
|
Joe Haden out
Dunno if he's worth 2 points to the line |
KABOOOM | 31 |
|
|
Record:
ATS 9-6 ML 6-9 +225 Sorry for the late post, and happy holidays to all! Week 16: CHI @ PHI Line: CHI +2.5 CHI +115 ML While much has been made about the Eagles' "high powered offense" under Chip Kelly, it's unclear how well Philly actually does in a shootout, and they weren't up to the task last week at Minnesota. On the other hand, whether it's been Cutler or McCown under center, the Bears have been able to score. Chicago should also be more motivated, as the NFC North playoff picture is still unclear while the NFC East will come down to the week 17 game regardless. Interesting Stat of the Week: Over the last 2 seasons, week 16 home favorites favored by a FG or less went 1-5 SU and ATS. |
NBA2H | 49 |
|
|
Yea and I thought I capped this game really well too. My first thought when I saw the game was that this was an easy under. Then I did some research and found that Cleveland had played over their last 8 or so road games, and that Chicago tended to cover when their games went over. So I flipped and took Chicago and over as parts of the parlay.
|
NBA2H | 7 |
|
|
I usually don't do this, but been on a horrible losing streak and just had to vent a little. Tonight capped off by last leg of a 3 team parlay Cle@Chi over 187, they scored 4 points in the last 4 minutes of the game.
|
NBA2H | 7 |
|
|
Those big lines didn't work out so well but the trap lines were definitely traps. Easy money there.
|
NBA2H | 7 |
|
|
IND -10.5, PHI +10, BOS +2, LAC +2.5
Road favorites of less than 3 always seem kind of like a trap, a square play if you will, and they appear to be the case again tonight. MIN@BOS b2b road game, 3rd road game in 4 nights for TWolves. They are a bad team on the road and a terrible team on b2bs. SAS@LAC No one will argue that the Clips are a good team. But the line is set such that SAS is an elite team. Are we sure about that? They may be consistent, but they haven't really beaten anyone. Their best wins have been against Phoenix, Minny, and GSW w/out Curry. They've lost to all the good teams they've played, including Houston, OKC, Portland, Indy. LAC, however, has beaten OKC, GSW, and Houston at home. PHI@BKN The Nets shouldn't be favored by double digits over anyone. But most importantly, the Nets are not a very good team at easy buckets/easy shots, and won't be able to take advantage of Philly's porous defense DET@IND Detroit's strength is in its size, but Indiana has enough bigs to handle that. The Pistons are on a b2b after a tough OT loss, which is probably more likely to tire out said bigs. Without easy points in the paint, Indy should shut them down easily. GL All! |
NBA2H | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NBA2H: LAC -4.5 , MIA -12.5 , DAL -12.5 , SAS -6.5 Perfectly fine way to "waste" my money. Even though Cleveland covered, every team on a b2b playing a team with rest was at one point down big. I even missed Portland! |
NBA2H | 11 |
|
|
Looking like easy $$ so far
|
NBA2H | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.