Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rankings: Offensive Rankings: Defensive Rankings:
|
NFL_Sharp | 16 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Program Plays were 2-1 in Week 4. The non-official play (axed when Glennon was named starter in TB) that will be counted toward record lost: Overall: 2-2, -0.10 units A lot of plays this week, much more than the average for the program. Typically there we be around 5-6 sides per week and 1 total. This week there are 8 sides and 2 totals. Week 5 Plays: Like I said, a lot of plays this week. No 2+ units plays yet, but the strongest appear to be Kansas City/Tennessee Under, San Diego, and Houston. Projected Week 5 Scores: |
NFL_Sharp | 16 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Also, Tampa Bay would not have been a play if it had been made known Glennon would be behind center. I will leave the play posted above and count it against units won/lost and the overall record posted here (as I know buying back a posted play usually doesn't go over well) but as for my own personal system records, it will not be counted.
I just wanted to post in case anyone hadn't bet yet and was considering following these plays. As I said, I will keep it in the records and profit/loss her on Covers, but it would not be a system play. QB injuries/replacements are the only ones that will have this affect on the system. In my personal opinion, only injuries to QBs should cause line movements; movements caused by any injuries at any other position are simply value added to the opposite side of the line - in my experience, there are no exceptions to this. |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DEFENSE
1 Kansas City 2 Houston 3 New York Jets 4 Tennessee 5 Cincinnati 6 San Francisco 7 Seattle 8 Cleveland 9 New England 10 Tampa Bay 11 Pittsburgh 12 New Orleans 13 Carolina 14 Miami 15 Baltimore 16 New York Giants 17 Denver 18 Indianapolis 19 Philadelphia 20 Dallas 21 Arizona 22 Detroit 23 St. Louis 24 Jacksonville 25 Green Bay 26 Washington 27 Oakland 28 Buffalo 29 Atlanta 30 Minnesota 31 Chicago 32 San Diego |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OFFENSE
1 Denver 2 San Diego 3 Atlanta 4 Buffalo 5 Chicago 6 Seattle 7 Green Bay 8 Oakland 9 Philadelphia 10 New England 11 Detroit 12 Dallas 13 Indianapolis 14 New Orleans 15 New York Jets 16 Cincinnati 17 Washington 18 Carolina 19 Tampa Bay 20 Miami 21 Baltimore 22 San Francisco 23 New York Giants 24 Houston 25 St. Louis 26 Pittsburgh 27 Tennessee 28 Minnesota 29 Kansas City 30 Arizona 31 Cleveland 32 Jacksonville |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OVERALL |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thanks to all and best of luck to you guys. Holding - I suppose all we can do is wait and see. Good luck to you this week and this season. rosterjunkies - Will do. Good luck this year. |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thanks guys - best of luck to you all as well. BYB - Seattle 20.42 @ Houston 20.31 System expects a solid ground game from Houston and a lot of heat on Wilson (much more so than vice versa on Schaub, by more than double). Clear passing advantage to Seattle though, even considering the aforementioned pressure on Wilson. Good luck this week. Also, here are the final two projected scores Week 4: Washington 23 @ Oakland 27 No plays in either. Final card is the one listed in the original post. Best of luck this week to all. |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thanks Alta - good luck to you as well.
|
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same system as last year - posted record here on Covers was 26-18 on sides and 8-5 on totals. Overall record 34-23 (59.7%) - not sure on the units, but I believe a good majority of the higher unit plays won. So, I'm guessing units were around +15 to +20 (if anyone wants to check that, please let me know if you do). The unposted record was better than the above 60%, and I expect these plays to hit upwards of 65% (with a relatively high statistical significance). I know that number seems crazy, but it's what I expect, statistically. Under 60% would honestly shock me. I don't say that facetiously or arrogantly, I just want to fully disclose my expectations. Please wait a few weeks to see how the plays are doing before criticizing and attacking the previous expectation.
Again, full disclosure here - the system ideally would need four weeks of data to become become fully operational, but I'm running these off of only three; I think that's enough for at least above average accuarcy - but long term would not expect these to hit at the +65% like the rest of the season's games. I don't have enough data to give a more exact expectation for these, but I'd like to guess somewhere between 50% and 65%. Enough said, below are the picks. Week 4 Plays: Tampa Bay -3 (+100) Detroit -3 (-105) New York Jets +4.5 (-110) Chicago/Detroit Over 47.5 (-110) All of the above are 1 unit plays. There may be plays involving the Denver/Oakland games next week, and will run the projections on those after tonight's game. The following are the system's projections for the games. Some projections below will seem to necessitate a play (i.e. the NYG/KC game), but the plays are not based on these projected scores. They're based on the projected stats that underly the scores. I post them just as a reference for trends, patterns, etc, although they will usually be fairly accurate (in the absence of an unusual amount of fluke plays - pick 6's, red zone fumbles, special teams touchdowns, etc). Last year, teams projected to win actually ended up winning somewhere in the high 70 percents I believe. If someone wants to thread through last year's posts for an exact number, please post it when/if you do. Also, for more explanation/color on the score/ATS-play disparity or any other questions, I answered a good number throughout the year last season if you don't mind searching back for those threads - there's only one thread per week. I don't have near the free time I did previously, so will have a harder time getting in-depth on topics or questions brought up here, but will do my best to answer any and all. Sorry for the long-winded post - and again, if it came across as arrogant or condescending, I promise that wasn't and is never my intention. Best of luck to everyone this year! Week 4 Projections: San Francisco 24 @ St. Louis 19 Pittsburgh 17 @ Minnesota 22 Seattle 20 @ Houston 20 New York Giants 10 @ Kansas City 25 Baltimore 23 @ Buffalo 28 Cincinnati 18 @ Cleveland 16 Arizona 14 @ Tampa Bay 27 Chicago 23 @ Detroit 28 Indianapolis 28 @ Jacksonville 16 New York Jets 19 @ Tennessee 20 Dallas 28 @ San Diego 29 New England 21 @ Atlanta 22 Miami 17 @ New Orleans 24 Again, best of luck to all this week and this season |
NFL_Sharp | 18 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sorry - Sides records should be 37-22-2 and Totals 7-5
|
NFL_Sharp | 10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NFL_Sharp | 10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NFL_Sharp | 10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NFL_Sharp | 10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NFL_Sharp | 10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sorry for the late posting, been extremely busy lately. Sides on the season are 24-14 and Totals are 6-4. Good luck to everyone this week.
Week 17 Plays: 2** Philadelphia +7 2** Houston -6.5 2** Miami +10.5 Carolina +5 Buffalo -3 (-120) Jacksonville +4 2** Baltimore/Cincinnati Under 41 Houston/Indianapolis Under 46.5 Green Bay/Minnesota Under 46 |
NFL_Sharp | 10 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
replied to
NFL_Sharp Week 16 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (35-18-2 Sides YTD, 66.0%)
in NFL Betting
Final add: Houston -7.5 -- would be a 2** at -7 or less.
Good luck to all today
|
NFL_Sharp | 41 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
replied to
NFL_Sharp Week 16 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (35-18-2 Sides YTD, 66.0%)
in NFL Betting
Sorry, I haven't had the time to post lately. I'm adding Tennessee +11. May have one more before kickoff.
|
NFL_Sharp | 41 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
replied to
NFL_Sharp Week 16 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (35-18-2 Sides YTD, 66.0%)
in NFL Betting
Thanks to everyone for all the luck. Good luck to you all as well.
Decided to run and post the overall SOS adjusted efficiency rankings for the season to date, in case anyone would care to see them. These, along with L3 rankings heading into the postseason last season were very accurate in predicting postseason results. Here they are:
|
NFL_Sharp | 41 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
replied to
NFL_Sharp Week 16 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (35-18-2 Sides YTD, 66.0%)
in NFL Betting
|
NFL_Sharp | 41 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.