Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Speaking as a Twins fan, the Twins are finished.
If you won an individual bet on them, congratulations -- But the season is over. We'll be lucky to finish in front of the Indians. |
Havelin | 17 |
|
![]() |
Detroit would have been the system pick Tuesday -- and lost.
I didn't like them nearly as much as Tampa or Philly -- who both covered. (This makes the top-favorite-in-August 13-7, +6.3. Not bad, but not nearly as much as our the plays have done that people look into and have some reasoning behind. Maybe all this handicapping we do makes a difference.) On to Thursday... |
runlines | 1 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by runlines: OOOPS -- I mean on to Wednesday's thread, here. Crimmenny!!! On to Wednesday: HERE.... |
runlines | 10 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by runlines: So-so day, guys -- on to Wednesday's thread... OOOPS -- I mean on to Wednesday's thread, here. |
runlines | 10 |
|
![]() |
So-so day, guys -- on to Wednesday's thread, here.
|
runlines | 10 |
|
![]() |
Getting late in the month, guys --
Yesterday's favorite picks did okay -- Giants win was ugly -- Tampa Rays failed to cover -- System 13-6 now, + 7.3 (remember, we do not endorse or oppose this, but do report on it knowing some are interested) -- and so now it's on to Wednesday... |
runlines | 8 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by BBC4WhiteGirls: Get da FUCKKKKKKKKKKKK OUTTA HERE - With this garbage runline Tampax system Covers moderators, could you please put a leash on the puppy? He doesn't seem to be house-trained. |
runlines | 10 |
|
![]() |
getting back to baseball: I like Giants runline...
Lincecum wins rematch against Bailey, no implosion by SF bullpen this time. 90 percent plus runline cover rate when he pitches and SFG win. |
estes1717 | 345 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by BBC4WhiteGirls: SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT
SCAM ALERT Gimme a Q: Q Gimme another Q: Q Gimme another Q: Q Gimme another Q: Q What's that spell? 4Q, douche bag. |
estes1717 | 345 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by thecrisp9: i like atlanta a lot tomoro Perez seems to have picked it up a bit -- but even in his quality starts, the Mets seem to give up a lot of runs. Could be a good idea. Like 59 says, the best runlines are not necessarily the heaviest faves. Though I love that Lincecum RL cover rate -- about 90 percent. And I doubt they'll repeat the embarassment of the last time he matched up with Bailey. Hence, Giants too. |
runlines | 10 |
|
![]() |
Monday's "system play" (runline the longest favorite on the board daily in August) would have been the White Sox, who failed to cover, making it 13-5 and +8.3. (Candidly, I didn't like this one, and laid off, but I know there's value in a system, and that some of us in the thread follow it.) On to Tuesday... |
runlines | 10 |
|
![]() |
Looking good for Sunday guys -- I'll sum up our day later, but in the meantime, here's a space for getting on to Monday...
|
runlines | 6 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Support81: Can any of you watch a game without having a bet on it?
![]() Easily. Particularly if it's one I've laid off because one or both teams is inconsistent, and I'm trying to figure them out -- e.g., last year, the Magic. I watched the first couple games of the Hawks-Heat series before I would touch it, then hit each of the last 4 games correctly. |
boxingking09 | 28 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network: I coincide with your insight, good info attached, Yankee bats will be to much for the youngster, NY middle relief has held patt the last 8 games.. NYY RL / TAM RL get the strongest RL leans on Sundays Card..On the opposite; TOR ML 35% / SEA ML 22% both carry 'value' as dog plays/capable, but not probable... SN One thing I like about Fister -- about 12 walks in more than 100 innings pitched at Tacoma. He certainly can throw strikes if he wants to. That plus the feeling that the Yankees have a sort of Laker mentality -- that they're due to "take a day off" -- has me off the NYY. Not going to bet Seattle... just looking for a better matchup at a price more fitted to what I see as the real risk. |
runlines | 12 |
|
![]() |
Chris -- and Homer -- Aramis Ramirez did play for Cubs Saturday, so you know. He only pinch hit, but he is back in uniform. No indication on Sunday.
|
-5innings | 8 |
|
![]() |
The "system" play today would be the Cubs, but I agree with Homer, that's not necessarily the most attractive one on the board...
I think Tampa looks better as a runline play. And maybe the White Sox. I'm not in love with the Yankees that much either -- they're due to lose one, and Joba's regressed. |
runlines | 12 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by MistakeHitter: Add
CLEVELAND+140 I dont know why blackburn is favored this big??? Laffey has a 1.29 whip in his last 30 IP with 19 k and only 1 HR. Probably because of Laffey's home-away split, and the nagging believe that the Twins "can't" lose two inSubmit a row at home to the Indians. I don't say the Twins should be huge faves, but probably reasonable for them to be (-) something. |
MistakeHitter | 17 |
|
![]() |
Good day again yesterday guys -- the Cards covered, as did the Cubs, Angels, Rays, and Rangers -- the lattermost as pretty big underdogs.
The "system" (which we don't support or oppose, but which I know interests some) is now 12-4, and + 8.9 units on a one-unit-per-day application. On to Sunday.... |
runlines | 12 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by gameover2: Cubs have been struggling recently but I think that's because they were playing Colorado and Philly, 2 of the better teams in the NL. With Pitt however, I expect them to fare much better. Duke's not terrible, but he hasn't been good his past starts too. Plus, I don't believe he'll get run support tomorrow. I expect the Cubs to have boosted their morale with this blowout enough to cover the runline. I'm feeling St Louis but I'm just not comfotable with their offense. San Diego's been battling their past games too so I might just lay off this game. About the Angels, they got shelled last night worse than Afganistan or Iraq. Best believe they will pull through. Baltimore hasn't won consecutive games in weeks now so I'm leaning heavily against them. Lastly, I like playing day games over night games so in all likelihood, I'll pull the trigger big on the Cubs runline. I hear you... Yah, they should be able to take care of Pittsburgh. It is daunting to reflect that without Aramis, the Cubs are 30-37, including 1-5 most recently, and with him, they're 29-18. So with him, they have a better winning percentage than the Dodgers, and without him, they are slightly better than the Pirates. They actually split the two games against Colorado that Aramis played, and would not, I think, have been swept by Philly with him in the lineup. (With Aramis playing, they took one of three in Philadelphia just a few weeks ago.) I do like the way Pittsburgh has been playing (I mean, for your bet) -- getting pummeled, not only losing, but generally by more than 1 1/2. Of all their pitchers, Zach Duke would be the one I fear most, especially outside of Pittsburgh. Still, they've won three games since August 25 -- two of them against the Nationals. Not bad. |
runlines | 11 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by gameover2: Cubs look like a good play tomorrow as well. I'm a little nervous about the Cubs because of Aramis -- They sure pounded the ball yesterday, but that was one day against Morton. Without him, they lost 5 in a row, whereas with him, they had been on a real tear. He seems to make all the difference. Plus Zach Duke is not terrible. I'm not saying I'd take Pittsburgh, but I might just stay away from this one. Anyone have any thoughts on St. Louis, Detroit, and the Angels? |
runlines | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.