Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
It is one of several lingering symptoms since I got Covid in 2021. I have had long Covid ever since. |
playsmart | 59 |
|
|
Wound up playing on KC -146. Once they had 2nd half possession and 10 pt lead, I grabbed PHI +525 for about 1/4 as the original bet so that it didn't matter who won this one. |
Gambit27 | 25 |
|
|
I believe Philly is the better team but KC has gotten the most 1st downs via penalty since Mahomes became the starter in 2018. Currently, PHI +126 is getting 62% of the betting $$$ and Vegas always wins in the long run. I'm probably leaving this one alone but twist my arm and I'm taking KC -141. |
Gambit27 | 25 |
|
|
Signed up for this back in 2006 and immediately hit my first 9 picks in a row and won the hat. Fast forward to now, 1670 picks later, still haven't won a second hat, LOL.
|
shanghai | 9 |
|
|
I took HOU +2 in NFL yesterday and it is no longer listed.
|
shanghai | 1 |
|
|
My last survivor pick has been graded as a loss, yet I cannot make a pick for tomorrow because I have a pending pick. You can roll a turd in powdered sugar, but it is still a turd.
|
shanghai | 3 |
|
|
My most recent pick in Survivor was Evansville -10.5 over Ohio. While out with friends, I saw that the game went into OT and assumed it was a loss, given the spread. Evansville outscored Ohio 12-0 in OT to get the cover. I cannot honestly remember a time where I've been on the good or bad side of a game like this.
|
shanghai | 2 |
|
|
Just drop the Washington part and leave the team as the Redskins. The offending part of their team name will then be eliminated.
|
KingJohnI | 4 |
|
|
My last 20 survivor picks are 2-17-1, currently on a 9 pick losing streak. I should get a hat for that, LOL.
|
shanghai | 1 |
|
|
You gotta love it when your alternate pick covers much easier.
Original pick that was denied: WIS +3 Alternate pick: LOU +5.5 |
shanghai | 2 |
|
|
I made a selection for Survivor and received the following message:
Streak Survivor - No Pick Made
SORRY: Due to the consensus for this game, we cannot accept your pick.
I can understand the reasoning, but why is the matchup even listed to begin with if they will not allow a selection to be made? |
shanghai | 2 |
|
|
Congrats, I'll be happy to get halfway to that, 9 is my best.
|
Unstoppable Force | 37 |
|
|
The Bills were down 32-24 late in the 4th quarter. They somehow managed not only a TD, but also a 2 pt conversion using scrubs to force overtime. JAX drove to their 40 in OT, and missed a FG attempt. The Bills somehow found a way to get the win with a FG after driving the ball fairly deep into JAX territory.
|
shanghai | 1 |
|
|
Correction again, 14-5, not 15-6. I blame the beer, haha.
|
shanghai | 6 |
|
|
Correcting myself, the range was -121 to -140 for the home team, and the record was 5-2. This still leaves the visiting team record at 15-6. Again, I'm probably overanalyzing.
|
shanghai | 6 |
|
|
I rarely post here. My survivor win percentage is below .500. I don't even think about handicapping my survivor pick unless my streak reaches 5 or more. I've been signed up since sometime in 2006. The best I've ever done is winning a hat after picking my first 9 out of the gate, and haven't had a repeat performance since then. However, on to the subject matter...
I planned on picking the Dodgers as my next survivor pick before doing any research for 2 reasons: the Cardinals are my home team and have been on a sickening slump for awhile against teams that they should be beating to try to make up ground on the Brewers, and also, I'll be happy no matter the outcome, either my beloved Birds win or I'll add another notch to my streak. I just happened to click on the umpire stats for the upcoming matchup. The umpire, Wolf, has been involved in 6 total games in which either Kershaw or Lohse were the starting pitchers. 5 of the 6 involved Lohse, in which Lohse's teams went 0-5, losing by an average score of 6-2. The only game involving Kershaw was a 2-0 win for the Dodgers. I continued to look at the umpire stats and learned that visiting teams have a significant winning record this season when Wolf is behind the plate (16-10). I also noticed that the only time that the home team did well was as a small favorite. I believe the record was 5-1 for the -110 to -140 range. When you factor this out of the equation since LA is favored, that leaves the visiting team with a 15-5 record as long as the home team is not a small favorite. I have probably overanalyzed this one angle and am looking for constructive criticism.
|
shanghai | 6 |
|
|
I don't really try on survivor unless I get to 5 in a row. I just pick something at random. However, if it helps, a local friend of mine has been "trying" so to speak, and has nailed 15 of his last 16. His Wagerline identity is bigd21blackjack. He just hit his first "9 straight" to get the hat after over 500 picks. He lost his bid for #10, but promptly has hit 6 in a row since the lone loss.
|
snuke | 620 |
|
|
My 2-1-1 day actually put me into position #29 after day 2, 5-2-1 overall.
|
dgratz | 30 |
|
|
I went 3-1 (thanks to a shootout loss by Montreal Canadiens) and am listed in position #283.
|
dgratz | 30 |
|
|
My only prize was from me winning my first 9 in a row after signing up for Survivor. I hit my 9th pick in a row on 2/12/06, and was promptly emailed on 2/13/06, informing me that I had won a prize. The delivery of the prize took around 2 weeks, maybe 3.
|
tt62836 | 14 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.