Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
replied to
GucciCapper recommends slamming the TWOLVES 2nd half. They are Hungry and will outright win!!!!
in NBA Betting
I hope so bro. I need this or else the bookie gonna have my %&#$ on monday.
|
GucciCapper | 17 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Chicago Sky +4.5 NY Liberty -240 Nationals -260 Dodgers -133 Mets +121 Brewers +195 Giants -190 Rays +131 Tigers -111 Royals +100 Cubs -127 Phillies/Nationals under 9.5 Mariners/As over 8 Redsox/Jays over 9 1.00 to win 6,454.00 |
slimshady420 | 1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Indigo999 | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Uhmm since the break? Are you kidding me? These chicks have had a month off!!! It's not going to take long for them to get back to how they were looking before the break. Eventually griner will not even be a focus for them on offense. She will start getting in foul trouble again because she's too lazy to move her feet. I'd be happy if they played up to their potential but if you are going to make ridiculous claims after 3-4 games after the break I am sorry I cannot take you serious then. I'm looking at the total package they have displayed this year. They just gave up 87 points to the freaking Sun!
Other than that since you want to talk about things happening since the break they played a fever team that is struggling to score. The Sparks look like they are in cruise control and the wings are one of the most inconsistent offense teams in the league. They (the mercury) haven't done a dam thing to justify betting an under. And because they are the Mercury they have the ability to score 90 points themselves if everything is clicking. Sorry just don't see the value in an under bet here. Good luck with your pick
|
Indigo999 | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Season to date: 14-11 In my career as a basketball player, I played against teams that were without rest on the road. We ran them in the first half and in the second half we ran them off the court. Which is why this game is going over. Who bets unders in a Mercury game? They play ZERO defense
|
Indigo999 | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by ogBuck:
Meant to say I've bet on their last 56 games, not 66. Tailed you today |
ogBuck | 9 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
BLUE JAYS
|
mlesnet | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
mlesnet | 11 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Lol literally the worst place to come to for WNBA picks. Everyone here blows
|
Indigo999 | 7 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by icegun98: 2.5 innings to go w a 6 run cushion, were good As soon as I saw the reverse line movement with Texas turned into the favorites I knew I most likely lost my money. Here is the comeback. Rockies blew it again
|
PoeticJustice | 16 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Angels247 | 2 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by bravis: I don't do a lot of post but after seeing some of the responses on this posting I decided to do some math on it and post what I found. I'm not here to bash anyone and if something is working for you GREAT.... BOL of to you.....However this is what I came up with... First off there is much more to this than just a win loss record. Because if you don't collect after the 2nd inning the compounded losses from the 2nd and or the 7th innings will reduce your net win totals on each game. Since it has been stated that the lines run between -110 to -140 I used an average of -125 for every line........ If you bet $125 and win in the 2nd inning you will win $100....pretty straight forward... If you need to bet 7th inning it will cost $250 for you to collect $200 but you would have lost $125 on the first wager for a net win of $75.... If you need to go to the 8th inning it will cost $500 to win $400 but you would have lost $125 and $250 for a net win of just $25..... During the 10 days there was 60 wins in the 2nd inning 53 wins in the 7th inning 17 wins in the 8th inning and 17 games where the was a run in all 3 innings where we would lose $875 per game ($125 + $250 + $500) All but 2 days (1st and 5th) had a least one game where runs were scored in all 3 innings and 6 of the 10 days had at least 2 games where there were runs in all 3 innings..... Using our net wins by innings we would have won.... 2nd inning 60 x $100 for a profit of $6000 7th inning 53 x $75 for a profit of $3975 8th inning 17x $25 for a profit of $425 for a total of $10400....... However in the 17 games a run was scored in all 3 we lost $875 per game for a total of $14875 giving a net loss of $4475..... Again Kevin if you found something that works for you I wish you the best. I'm simply posting this for those who are wondering what the numbers look like for EVERY game during a short period of time..... If anyone else wants to look at another time period and do the same thing it would be nice to see the results if they are different that what I came up with but for now I think I have seen enough!!!! BOL to all |
Kevin66 | 181 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by HalfArcturian: Go fk yourself you useless POS |
jrgumpert | 12 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
chongui | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Kevin66: Odds are usually -110 to -140, I bet $100 on no runs or tie second inning if that loses I will take no runs or tie in the 7th for $200 if that loses then $400 on no runs or tie in 8th. 8-0 just yesterday so the rest of you can go f@ck yourself a I was trying to help you all out. I say no runs or tie because sometimes the odds are better for one or the other. Which one exactly do you pick though? How do you know to pick no runs OR they will tie? Or is that an option all as one bet? Or is it two separate bets 1)no runs for 100 2) tie for 100 ? |
Kevin66 | 181 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
I do not have time to "run the numbers" but i have checked the box score of a few games the past few days and this guy is right. Quite a few times teams either tie or score no runs in the second inning. My question is what are the odds usually like? I dont live bet ever so if you are betting no runs scored in an inning live AND also betting the teams will tie it would have to be high odds to make any money....
You would have to have no life at all to be sitting around through all these games to do this watching every single one to get your bet in at the top of the first inning
|
Kevin66 | 181 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: Only an idiot....or someone that knows Scott Servais.....would've bet the cubs down 6-0 Well I for sure dont know Scott so I guess that means.....
|
slimshady420 | 10 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
There we go!
|
slimshady420 | 10 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
wont let me copy and paste my ticket. says its too many characters
|
slimshady420 | 10 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
slimshady420 | 10 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.