SteamMoves

sorry lanastis- but i will not let this guy run around spouting BS

best of luck on the rest of your wagers, clev and over looks solid

youre out of line and way off base, and this is the last time i will answer you because A) i dont want to cloud this thread

and B) youre a moron

yes, i was telling people not to back kip wells

wanna know WHY?? (this will reinforce my point B)

BECAUSE ITS A PUBLIC FORUM AND I WAS TRYING TO SAVE PEOPLE MONEY

i had his triple a numbers and have seen a lot of him over the years

you fail to mention that i was right. how many runs did he give up int he first? was it 8 or 9?

dont worry, i wont try to save serial tailers like you money anymore, ill let you continue to pounce on sucker bets and piss your bankroll away

good day.

you aint gotta bash him like that rock

even i wouldnt root for lann to lose, that aint right bro

its easy to say why i wouldnt follow these

people that play chalk consistently, on a daily basis, dont win.

it doesnt take much effort to just lay chalk day in, day out either.

thats not a system

now lets go play nice in the sandbox, good day

do you realize you just contradicted yourself with this post?

go look, i had a half page writeup, on my thread that night, solely on why NOT to play kip wells way before the game even started

so your whole "after the fact" argument that youve conjured up.......

faillllllllllllllllllllll

cleveland is -210

maybe give them a shot?

what happened, king lanny

i thought laying -170 was a profitable endeavor?

cheap as bait

i cant hear you

your mouth is jarbled with his penis being in it

i almost feel like this is a good letdown spot for SF coming off the sweep of the nats, and theyre pretty awful in openers (13-20) while zona is a little better at 18-15....

but like you said arizonas road record, losing 24 of last 35,  is almost an autofade here with them laying chalk... and i think having the line  set where it is theyre definitely looking for zona money

todays card