Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes it is today, Jan 23. |
Sox14 | 4 |
|
|
Good day Covers IT group, Kindly assist in enabling the added games to become available on the King of Covers NCAA BB.
Thank you, Luc |
SudburyDowns | 2 |
|
|
I can confirm that I cannot submit any new picks whatsoever. |
Unstoppable Force | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team:
Hey everyone,Looks like it may be fixed now, I haven't gotten confirmation from the IT team, but I was able to make a selection just now.- CT
I am having the same issues today as I had all afternoon yesterday. Doesn't work in any location. |
revnecro1273 | 19 |
|
|
Yes and it is still flawed.
|
zoocorp | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team:
Those games are now available for selection.- CT
Vermont still is not an option on my page. |
SudburyDowns | 5 |
|
|
Same problem, some people have had access and we appear not to.
|
bk1374 | 3 |
|
|
I am seeing many games on my King of Covers College Basketball which I am not able to choose from. The following are 2 examples of game matches which have consensus picks and but don't show up on my list of lined games to chose from: Maine v. Vermont, Fairleigh Dickingson v. LIU Brooklyn
|
SudburyDowns | 5 |
|
|
I see the same lines used on this site, on VegasInsider.com, Vi Consensus which I use on the previous day to set up any picks I decide to play.
Quote Originally Posted by Covers-Team: Hello, NCAAB totals have not been posted yet at several books. Once they are released, they will become available in NCAAB KOC and NCAAB Office Pools. - CT |
greeneyeddevils | 10 |
|
|
It appears you are having the same issues with the college basketball totals again today.
|
greeneyeddevils | 10 |
|
|
For me, it is not working in Ultimate Race and I use Chrome.
|
darkman9 | 5 |
|
|
I see the totals are update on the score and matchups page although not available on the NCAABB Kings of Covers section.
|
SudburyDowns | 1 |
|
|
Not only survivor now, NCAABB cannot make picks
|
agreat582 | 10 |
|
|
It appears Survivor page is out of order as well.
|
LT PROFITS | 12 |
|
|
Never been able to play 2 games on the same day, as I believe the spirit of the rule is one game per calendar day.
The issue is that now, we cannot make our next pick or selection until the next calendar day, whereas previous to this system update, we could make our next pick the same day our previous pick had completed. Now we must wait until the next following day to make our next pick. |
M10barr | 6 |
|
|
Contest Bet CardPlease make a selection on the left.
I have no pending picks. I have restarted my pc, refreshed, tried another game, no luck. |
SudburyDowns | 26 |
|
|
Hello All,
Cannot seem to be able to find the leader board for specific sport Over under or ATS for that matter. Where can I find the leader board, for example in NCAA Football over under 2015 season? Thank you |
SudburyDowns | 1 |
|
|
Dallas ran crazy last year at home against the Rams, don't think they'll try to reinvent the wheel.
Dallas -1.5
|
Covers | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by echelon1: I love how people dismiss the entire situation to focus on emotions. Sure Dallas blew a big lead and the defense looks like a wet paper bag. Is it just me or did Washington lose to a much more pathetic Atlanta team than GB last week??? As a matter of fact hasn't Washington lost 6 in a row? Get some perspective here. I'm not saying Dallas is the hands down choice here, just saying just because it looks like Dallas is gimping around and shitting the bed, doesn't mean the team they are facing isn't 3 times more ineffective. If this were Dallas vs. someone proving they can win now and then, then fade the Boys here. But that's not the case with Washington, not at all. They lost to the ATLANTA FALCONS for their 6th straight loss last week. Think about it. And believe it or not with Washington's lack of "multiple" dangerous receiving targets, the shitbag Dallas pass defense actually matches up much better with the Skins offense than they do with the majority of other teams. My key to this game is simple, do Sean Lee and/or Morris Claiborne play. If either plays they can arrange a defensive formation to give them a better shot on defense. With Claiborne, they will bring Church down as a hybrid MLB in the nickel and have 3 worthy corners and less scrub LB's on the field. They've run this formation before and it is fairly effective for them. With Lee in they can play more of a man attack in the front 7 as Lee, Wilber, and Holloman will be an effective LB unit to pair with the DL to at least hold their ground well. Then the secondary can have a better setup than last week. But trying to compensate for all the LB's that went down while missing Claiborne is too much, and any decent passing offense should move the ball at will. Cousins would eat their lunch. Like I say, if you see Lee OR Claiborne back, Dallas is the pick. If neither...I just can't see the defense putting up enough resistance...although the scorefest will be close. Either way, betting Washington here is not a smart move whatsoever. I'd go Dallas for the reasons above, or just make it a no-play if none of them occur. Bet Washington at your own risk, it's not a solid, substantiated choice beyond whiplash emotion from being a Skins fan or disappointment in Dallas. And betting for those reasons is just naive and fruitless. Both Lee and Claiborne out this game.
|
Covers | 32 |
|
|
As a cowboys fan, I hate to say these types of things but this could get real ugly.
Saints -7
|
Covers | 73 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.