Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marshall +19.5.......to win outright. |
Raidernator76 | 51 |
|
|
@mws Replying again I did do a little more research on the FIU-IU game. It was mentioned in the video I watched that while at James Madison and Elon, the worst Cignetti did in a home opener is win by 33. 33! Will that completely get me off this game now? Could be. |
Hulk_Hogan | 26 |
|
|
@mws On FIU as well as upset of the week. Seems like everyone is focused on WV as upset of the week. I need to do a deeper dive, but so far I can't come up with a reason Indiana is favored by 3 TD's. Seem like similar teams both with crappy defenses last year. Looking at the over 50.5 as well. Indiana has a completely new system while FIU only loses their star receiver. 3 td's though seems like way too much. Is it because they are giving IU too much credit for being in the big 10? |
Hulk_Hogan | 26 |
|
|
1st and goal at the 1......Penn St even gifted WIS a missed extra point. Had WIS ML in a parlay. WIS is now on my never again list. Just horrendous playing. Coach should be immediately fired for so many screw ups near the end zone. |
Seahawks14 | 19 |
|
|
Will we ever see OP again? |
Jerseyboy89 | 13 |
|
|
Saw he is questionable on the injury report.....is he playing today? |
the_dude911 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty4:
All games are fixed when $$$$$ is involved. It just one is more obvious than the other. They already knew the outcome BEFORE they even kick the ball. Some idiots on here will bash me but I don't give the F.
We'll bash you because you have no evidence of anything being fixed. Just making dumb statements with nothing to back it up. Pure conspiracy theories. The only thing that can be 100% proven by your statement is you lack critical thinking skills. |
guyhopestowin | 16 |
|
|
@thorpe "Just because a bet wins quite frequently, doesn't mean it is profitable" Agreed. That is why I was considering mixing in more risky bets ie Illini ML as a dog last week as well. Like I said in my original post, losing one of these with just huge favorites, it is hard to make up ground because it would take more than 2 more big fave parlay wins just to get back to break even after a loss. I was looking to try something different this year, but I want to try to stay as consistent as I can with my strategy. Maybe that is pointless who knows. |
the_dude911 | 11 |
|
|
@snakebite44 That is true about paying for the entire season but that is exactly the opposite of my strategy. I'm going for low risk/low return this season. |
the_dude911 | 11 |
|
|
@xMORTICIANx A option is setting up well again for Thursday (leaving off the BSU/CFLA and Ohio ST/MIN games). Bur Friday there are a lot of close spreads. Of course I could just skip Friday, but I probably wont. Will probably go with .5U bet or less for Friday's slate. Then of course Saturday there are more than enough huge spread games where I just have to decide how many of them do I take on one parlay. |
the_dude911 | 11 |
|
|
Last week for week zero, I placed a 3 team ML parlay with 3 of the heavy favorites and it cashed 1u getting me about .4u in profit. I was going to also include ILLINI ML (who was a TD dog), but thought I'd be taking on too much risk. My profit would have been 1.7u if I had included Illini. I guess my question is, am I going to have to take on some more riskier ML plays like ILLINI during the course of the season to make this work? My thinking is if I happen to lose one of these parlays just using big favorites, it's gonna take over 2 of them just to get back to break even. I don't expect to make a fortune with my strategy, but at the end of the season I want to see a profit. Should I just A. continue with using strictly heavy ML favorites that I like B. Mixing in some riskier plays (even dogs that I like) or C. Creating 2 parlays each game set (if available), using both A and B? Also, if I just choose option A, how many big ML faves is too much for 1 parlay? |
the_dude911 | 11 |
|
|
i just started my mlb betting season last night so take this for what it is worth. I took ARI last night and snuck out with a win, and I was going to bet ATL today, but now I see Soroka is pitching so he is somewhat of an unknown commodity. I personally might now just lay off this game completely but I would not be taking ARI in this spot.
|
DialedCaper7 | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
I fail to understand why people care what other anonymous gamblers bet...it has zero relevance. It was the same guy who bet the World Series and cleaned up. So it has some relevance. |
snowman76 | 48 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by barneybeans:
So someone has a big bet, real or fake how does this matter?
Every big sporting event has huge bets being made. I dont understand why people think a million dollar bet is such a big deal these days. That being said with over 70% of the public on the Pats and I'm sure money on the east coast is still pouring in on the Pats, so the line could easily sustain a million dollar bet on the Rams. There was also a $2 million bet on the Rams ML at MGM I believe. |
snowman76 | 48 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mathwiz:
I can't believe you guys believe this non-sense. Really? You guys believe this??? It's laughable. You guys believe everything you read on the internet?? First off, it was first reported by Covers.com. End of story. There's more, but that's enough. You guys keep believing everything you hear on the internet. Listen to your weatherman, what he says is 100% true. Listen your wife when she tells you she isn't cheating on you. LMAO. C'mon guys. You're better than this. "Better", no pun intended. Now that's funny. Here, since you believe that 1.5 mill wager. Maybe you'll believe this as well. Like my thread says. It's a 100% winner, Patriots ML.
I guess $1.5 million is a lot to you..... |
snowman76 | 48 |
|
|
Well, on the positive side I hit another parlay last week. The downside I was up a whopping $5 for the week. Have yet to hit that big parlay for the season to lock in a profit. So I'm 5-26 on parlays this season for a net of -$111.40. Here are this weeks two parlays. Basically going all in on my selections and not mixing it up: #1: TAM -3 NE -6 1/2 CHI -6 1/2 SEA +9 PHI -7 $30 to win $751.65
#2: TAM -3 NE -6 1/2 CHI -6 1/2 SEA +9 PHI -7 JAX +3 $20 to win $820 |
the_dude911 | 23 |
|
|
I had them in three different money line parlays. MONEY LINE. All you had to do was ANYTHING but turn the ball over. ANYTHING. Run the freekin clock down THEN take a shot. What the hell were they doing trying to chuck up a shot with 22 seconds left? Run the clock down to about 10 seconds then go for the shot. Oh my god a 6th grade basketball coach even knows that. Just so tilted by this game! |
Doubleadownon12 | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Cavs2017Champs:
Hahahaha 2 out of those 3 didnt even play in the playoffs and Ariza shot 0 - 10 in Game 7... STOP overreacting to regular season games, hell, stop overreacting to the scripted NBA in general... Houston is winning the West this season.. Can you tell us who writes up the script every day? Please stop embarrassing yourself. |
Limitlessxp | 4 |
|
|
Nothing can compare to this guy that posted a 10 team parlay in college football in the first few weeks of the season. Missed every single game. |
NOREAGA | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NotASingleDoubt:
lol got fuken moosed againHad miami +2.5/under 215.5@3.6 for 1000.Fuken Wade misses both FT and its going to OT at 105 all...=> crazy how that game managed to go to OT thought I was dead in that game....hoping DET can pull out the win. |
gamblorman | 36 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.