These 2 teams played each other earlier this year down at Melbourne. The dogs have come the closest to the Storm this year down in Melbourne (i am not including the tigers win without there Storm trio).
We lost by 6, and one of there tries should never have been a try (Storm prop Vavai dropped the ball into a dogs player and straight back to Vavai - play on and the Storm scored the very next play the ball).
Furthermore, the dogs got stopped right right on the try line about 3 times with Reynolds actually hitting the goal post which prevented him from scoring.
The dogs back then were still a work in progress and IMO are a much much better team 2 odd months down the track, especially with the addition of the skillful Inu who seems to have found some sort of consistency under Dessie, it is early yet, but maybe someone like Des can do wonders for Inu.
The Storm are without Billy.
Now, i know he missed the game last week and they won, i think this will work into the dogs favour, because that should eliminate any complacency, with everyone knowing the storm can win without slater.
Furthermore, Smith and Cronk are in the middle of an origin campaign, played on a very heavy track last week in a very very physical game. Now they have to travel up to QLD. This is a very good spot for the Dogs. Smith and Cronk have played on 2 very heavy tracks in 2 very bruising games in a row
Furthermore, the game changed last week after Glenn Stewart who is probably there best player left the game last week...
I am on the dogs, however, the refs may have different ideas.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
These 2 teams played each other earlier this year down at Melbourne. The dogs have come the closest to the Storm this year down in Melbourne (i am not including the tigers win without there Storm trio).
We lost by 6, and one of there tries should never have been a try (Storm prop Vavai dropped the ball into a dogs player and straight back to Vavai - play on and the Storm scored the very next play the ball).
Furthermore, the dogs got stopped right right on the try line about 3 times with Reynolds actually hitting the goal post which prevented him from scoring.
The dogs back then were still a work in progress and IMO are a much much better team 2 odd months down the track, especially with the addition of the skillful Inu who seems to have found some sort of consistency under Dessie, it is early yet, but maybe someone like Des can do wonders for Inu.
The Storm are without Billy.
Now, i know he missed the game last week and they won, i think this will work into the dogs favour, because that should eliminate any complacency, with everyone knowing the storm can win without slater.
Furthermore, Smith and Cronk are in the middle of an origin campaign, played on a very heavy track last week in a very very physical game. Now they have to travel up to QLD. This is a very good spot for the Dogs. Smith and Cronk have played on 2 very heavy tracks in 2 very bruising games in a row
Furthermore, the game changed last week after Glenn Stewart who is probably there best player left the game last week...
I am on the dogs, however, the refs may have different ideas.
Customer hoping to turn $1,000 into $110,630 with @NRL_Bulldogs +2.5 last leg of 9-Leg Multi at odds of $110.63. #NRLcbymel#nrlfox
Are any of these reports that are issued by betting agencies verified? You see it all the time from all the books, just a cheap way for them to get publicity.
Neil Evans was a serial offender when it came to tweeting supposed big bets that were staked with centrebet.
Customer hoping to turn $1,000 into $110,630 with @NRL_Bulldogs +2.5 last leg of 9-Leg Multi at odds of $110.63. #NRLcbymel#nrlfox
Are any of these reports that are issued by betting agencies verified? You see it all the time from all the books, just a cheap way for them to get publicity.
Neil Evans was a serial offender when it came to tweeting supposed big bets that were staked with centrebet.
Are any of these reports that are issued by betting agencies verified? You see it all the time from all the books, just a cheap way for them to get publicity.
Neil Evans was a serial offender when it came to tweeting supposed big bets that were staked with centrebet.
I believe this one
0
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
Are any of these reports that are issued by betting agencies verified? You see it all the time from all the books, just a cheap way for them to get publicity.
Neil Evans was a serial offender when it came to tweeting supposed big bets that were staked with centrebet.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.