Everyone on Mancity?

sooo every single person on this forum on mancity scares me 

Add one more...

@Thejuiceman89

 Why? You think that has any impact on the outcome of the match?

How many people in the world? And how many people in this forum? 

id say about 75% of bets world wide will be on man city

Nobody knows whos gonna win but if i were a betting man id pick the team thats been dominating for 2-3 years straight...tuchel can stop them tho not a bad bet

Again who cares how many people are on a side be it in this forum or in the World. It has absolutely nothing to do with the outcome of the event

This is not NFL or NBA Game. Vegas can't controle soccer

I'm feeling a 2-2 draw

hope you right guys but VAR plays a factor hopefully not many today but we all might have witnessed VAR affect the outcome of some of our bets before man city ML-105 only or play something small on -1 +195?

Man City for me too 

Under 2, 2.5

@Gusfgz

 Don't start that foolishness 

man city is the number one team on the epl for first half leads. i bet them to win the first half. if they dont depending how they start i might adjust halftime. i cant ignore stats

Apparently knowing the ticket count and breakdown of handle distribution (or in the case of this thread, most Covers posters are on Man City) is of super value to a lot of bettors. Me? I don't care and question the accuracy of those ticket count numbers.

There are great technical analysis cappers in this world who value greatly line movement, opening and closing line, reverse line movement (vs ticket count), all of which has no bearing on the match - just like the amt of COvers posters betting the same side. But all of this is meaningful to a lot of players.

Of course you know all of this. The question is if this info is meaningless to you and has no bearing on how you handicap a sporting event why are you here, frustrated, criticizing, adding zero?

Man City TT OV 1½ +125

BOL

@barneybeans thanks for the write up and BOL to you and the man city tt go get em 

@barneybeans

 I was not doing any of those thing you are accusing me of. I am not even wagering on the match.   No need to be a wise ass saying I do not get a cookie.

[Quote]It's an observation that has historical correlation even it's just meaningless binomial distribution. Obviously a professional match is not decided nor influenced by posters on a forum. There's no need to repeat this multiple times, you're not going to get a cookie. Either you're on City or not. Apparently knowing the ticket count and breakdown of handle distribution (or in the case of this thread, most Covers posters are on Man City) is of super value to a lot of bettors. Me? I don't care and question the accuracy of those ticket count numbers or the article about it at betting.co.uk. There are great technical analysis cappers in this world who value greatly line movement, opening and closing line, reverse line movement (vs ticket count), all of which has no bearing on the match - just like the amt of COvers posters betting the same side. But all of this is meaningful to a lot of players.[/Quote]

I absolutely agree with you on that! I was wagering on the match but not only on this one. And I know that there are technical analysis cappers in this world who value all these things.