sweet plays on byu and georgia this week,
bettor im not playing nmex nmexst or est mich those teams are so bad my sons little lg team would prob cover against them lol
thought nmex and nmexst would end in a tie lmao!!!!!
playboy 69 thanks for helping out i have been busy busy
Well, keep in mind that we're chasing. A chase loss really hampers your profits, especially using the Martingale. If you were just straight betting, then maybe using the LWL strategy would make more sense. But I feel that eliminating all losses is essential, considering the seriousness of just 1 Martingale loss.
Obviously, it's up to the bettor and the money management strategy. But nice find indeed 
So I have this as of Tuesday morning:
Lost 2 games SU & ATS (eligible for play week 6)
Miami (record: 2-2)
Lost 2 games SU & ATS (potential plays for week 7)
Cincinatti (record: 2-3)
Buffalo (record: 0-5)
Lost 1 game SU & ATS (potential plays for week 7)
Green Bay (record: 3-2)
Kansas City (record: 3-1)
Houston (record: 3-2)
New Orleans (record: 3-2)
Minnesota (record: 1-3)
Pittsburgh (record: 3-1)
So for week 6, Miami will be a play under the modified system (lost 2 SU & ATS).
If Cincinatti and/or Buffalo lose both SU and ATS, they'll be a play for week 7 under the original 3-game system.
If Green Bay, Kansas City, New Orleans, Houston, and Pittsburgh lose in week 6 both SU and ATS, they'll be a play for week 7 under the modified system.
We'll need Minnesota to lose both SU and ATS in both week 6 and week 7 for them to qualify under the 3-game system, since they've now fallen to 1-3
Have I missed any team that someone might see?
I missed a couple 1-loss SU and ATS teams:
Dallas (record: 1-3)
Denver (record: 2-3)
St. Louis (record: 2-3)
Cleveland (record: 1-4)
All of these teams will have to lose both SU and ATS in both week 6 AND week 7, since they're overall record will fall below .500 and not qualify them for a modified system play.
Lets clean it up a bit:
Plays for week 6 (lost 2 games SU & ATS, greater than .500 record)
Miami (record: 2-2)
Potential plays for week 7 (lost 2 games SU & ATS)
Cincinatti (record: 2-3)
Buffalo (record: 0-5)
Potential plays for week 7 (lost 1 game SU & ATS, greater than .500 record)
Green Bay (record: 3-2)
Kansas City (record: 3-1)
Houston (record: 3-2)
New Orleans (record: 3-2)
Pittsburgh (record: 3-1)
Potential plays for week 8 (lost 1 game SU & ATS)
Minnesota (record: 1-3)
Dallas (record: 1-3)
Denver (record: 2-3)
St. Louis (record: 2-3)
Cleveland (record: 1-4)
That should do it 
Cincy and Buffalo are not potential plays for JM system for week 7 because they are both on bye this week. They would be potentials for week 8.
However Miami is a potential for the JM system for week 7 if they lose SU and ATS this week. This would mean they lost the modified play this week though.
Correct on Cincy and Buffalo, I didnt realize they were both on a buy this week. We need both of them to lose another game SU and ATS for them to qualify.
Miami is a play for the modified JM system for this week. They've lost 2 SU and ATS, and also have a .500 (or greater) record. That's the criteria for the modified system.
Updated record: 2-0 (1-0 Modified system: Miami 
, 1-0 Regular system: Carolina )
Plays for week 7 (lost 2 games SU & ATS, greater than .500 record):
Green Bay (3-3)
Potential plays for week 8 (lost 2 games SU & ATS)
Cincinatti (record: 2-3)
Buffalo (record: 0-5)
Dallas (record: 1-4)
Denver (record: 2-4)
San Diego (record: 2-4)
Cleveland (record: 1-5)
Potential plays for week 8 (lost 1 game SU & ATS, greater than .500 record)
Chicago (record: 4-2)
Atlanta (record: 4-2)
Tampa Bay (record: 3-2)
Potential plays for week 9 (lost 1 game SU & ATS)
Carolina (record: 0-5)
Oakland (record: 2-4)
We'll see what happens on MNF and give a quick update after that. Neither team (Jacksonville or Tennessee) has any potential for a system play until at least week 9, though.
ok guys here is what i got for NCAA please double check me
1 Florida
2 central Mich
3 Florida atlanic
4 Virgina
5 TX A&M
6 Memphis
7 North texas
like i said was in a hurry so double check and see if i have missed one. I believe all others have covered, even New Mex and New Mex St. i didnt play those two but i thought i read it some where .
Nice play on miami!!!!!!
Go Green Bay!!!!!!!!
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
