Hey guys, is very sad to see the system is not showing the big profit as it use to be on previous years, it already has the number of losses that should've late on the season but oh well, I will never blame on therizz for sharing this great system as it has generated me big units on the past years, to bad for those that are just jumping in.
Personally, I run the 2 game variation I suggested a couple of years back and either way I'm not having the results as last year... I'm only down 1 unit, and to avoid the headaches I rather not to deal with teams like Boston or the Phillies, I really suggest you to avoid teams like these (below .500) until they start to play baseball and be real -200 favorites, just my two cents.
If you guys have good money management this system will bounce back sooner or later and there will be good profit by the end of season, I just hope you don't run out your bankroll before it happens. GL everyone
0
Hey guys, is very sad to see the system is not showing the big profit as it use to be on previous years, it already has the number of losses that should've late on the season but oh well, I will never blame on therizz for sharing this great system as it has generated me big units on the past years, to bad for those that are just jumping in.
Personally, I run the 2 game variation I suggested a couple of years back and either way I'm not having the results as last year... I'm only down 1 unit, and to avoid the headaches I rather not to deal with teams like Boston or the Phillies, I really suggest you to avoid teams like these (below .500) until they start to play baseball and be real -200 favorites, just my two cents.
If you guys have good money management this system will bounce back sooner or later and there will be good profit by the end of season, I just hope you don't run out your bankroll before it happens. GL everyone
Hey guys, is very sad to see the system is not showing the big profit as it use to be on previous years, it already has the number of losses that should've late on the season but oh well, I will never blame on therizz for sharing this great system as it has generated me big units on the past years, to bad for those that are just jumping in.
Personally, I run the 2 game variation I suggested a couple of years back and either way I'm not having the results as last year... I'm only down 1 unit, and to avoid the headaches I rather not to deal with teams like Boston or the Phillies, I really suggest you to avoid teams like these (below .500) until they start to play baseball and be real -200 favorites, just my two cents.
If you guys have good money management this system will bounce back sooner or later and there will be good profit by the end of season, I just hope you don't run out your bankroll before it happens. GL everyone
What's the 2 game variation?
0
Quote Originally Posted by gentruchi:
Hey guys, is very sad to see the system is not showing the big profit as it use to be on previous years, it already has the number of losses that should've late on the season but oh well, I will never blame on therizz for sharing this great system as it has generated me big units on the past years, to bad for those that are just jumping in.
Personally, I run the 2 game variation I suggested a couple of years back and either way I'm not having the results as last year... I'm only down 1 unit, and to avoid the headaches I rather not to deal with teams like Boston or the Phillies, I really suggest you to avoid teams like these (below .500) until they start to play baseball and be real -200 favorites, just my two cents.
If you guys have good money management this system will bounce back sooner or later and there will be good profit by the end of season, I just hope you don't run out your bankroll before it happens. GL everyone
what about 1st 5inn with the RL (-.5) can get way better odds than ML?
If we do play this system as well along with the full game version, then DO NOT play the -.5 for the 1st 5 innings!!!! You would have something like an additional 10 losses!!! If we do play the variation of this system ONLY play ML for 1st 5 and I would filter out teams who have trouble scoring recently. I saw a lot of losses coming when teams dont score or only 1/2 in the first 5 for all 3 games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Riceboi:
what about 1st 5inn with the RL (-.5) can get way better odds than ML?
If we do play this system as well along with the full game version, then DO NOT play the -.5 for the 1st 5 innings!!!! You would have something like an additional 10 losses!!! If we do play the variation of this system ONLY play ML for 1st 5 and I would filter out teams who have trouble scoring recently. I saw a lot of losses coming when teams dont score or only 1/2 in the first 5 for all 3 games.
2011 1st 5...................... vs 2011 Full game 5 3gm chase losses.. 8 or 9 3 game chase losses 1st 5 also has a bunch of 1 or 2 gm loses that would add up to about 2.4 3 gm chase losses. 177 wins ...................................194 wins
0
2011 1st 5...................... vs 2011 Full game 5 3gm chase losses.. 8 or 9 3 game chase losses 1st 5 also has a bunch of 1 or 2 gm loses that would add up to about 2.4 3 gm chase losses. 177 wins ...................................194 wins
Well it's a variation I suggested based on the original Opening Game Favorite Chase system posted by therizz, but using additional filters. It basically came out due that even when the therizz system generates more units itself during the season the 2 game variation does not require too many stressful chases at a higher winning average but less qualifying plays. I personally pull the trigger on game B's)game #3 of the series) that has the highest winning avg. (around 94%... I don't have the numbers of the 3 years I backtested but it is as successful as the original system but at a lower pct. of possible plays.
The main filters I use are the following.
- The chase starts right at game #2 after the qualifying team losses game #1. -This is a 2 game chase only (does not include the 4th game of a qualifying series) - The team should have open at least at -145 and close at least at -145 if any of the 2 reqs. is not met is not a play. - Only home teams - Only teams with winning pct. (over .500) - To pull the trigger big on bet B (6 to 10 units this is what I do) the team must have a winning pct. at that time of bet B - Quit using the system on September -I personally do not bet on really big favorites like -230 or more it's just not worth the risk and this games were not used on the stats.
The money management is on your own, I personally straight martingale on game B (or game# 3 of the series) and if the team fully qualifies I put up to 10 units. ( I made around 90 units using this filters last year) but I'm still waiting for a qualifying B bet yet this year.
If someone else wants to try it, do it on your own. Good luck everyone.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Riceboi:
What's the 2 game variation?
Well it's a variation I suggested based on the original Opening Game Favorite Chase system posted by therizz, but using additional filters. It basically came out due that even when the therizz system generates more units itself during the season the 2 game variation does not require too many stressful chases at a higher winning average but less qualifying plays. I personally pull the trigger on game B's)game #3 of the series) that has the highest winning avg. (around 94%... I don't have the numbers of the 3 years I backtested but it is as successful as the original system but at a lower pct. of possible plays.
The main filters I use are the following.
- The chase starts right at game #2 after the qualifying team losses game #1. -This is a 2 game chase only (does not include the 4th game of a qualifying series) - The team should have open at least at -145 and close at least at -145 if any of the 2 reqs. is not met is not a play. - Only home teams - Only teams with winning pct. (over .500) - To pull the trigger big on bet B (6 to 10 units this is what I do) the team must have a winning pct. at that time of bet B - Quit using the system on September -I personally do not bet on really big favorites like -230 or more it's just not worth the risk and this games were not used on the stats.
The money management is on your own, I personally straight martingale on game B (or game# 3 of the series) and if the team fully qualifies I put up to 10 units. ( I made around 90 units using this filters last year) but I'm still waiting for a qualifying B bet yet this year.
If someone else wants to try it, do it on your own. Good luck everyone.
Just to let everyone know, today will be the first B bet for the two game variation of the year on the St. Louis Cardinals @ -150. I'm pulling the trigger, gl everyone if some else does.
0
Just to let everyone know, today will be the first B bet for the two game variation of the year on the St. Louis Cardinals @ -150. I'm pulling the trigger, gl everyone if some else does.
Another crappy couple days. Only had like 1 winning day out of the last 10 or so.
All 2 game series this week, so we have a few days to clear our minds. Interleague starts after that. We only play the games that meet the over/under filter for IL. The game 2s and 3s are just wreaking havoc this year. Hopefully this thing will turn around. At this point I am just trying to scale down the plays until the ship rights itself
0
Another crappy couple days. Only had like 1 winning day out of the last 10 or so.
All 2 game series this week, so we have a few days to clear our minds. Interleague starts after that. We only play the games that meet the over/under filter for IL. The game 2s and 3s are just wreaking havoc this year. Hopefully this thing will turn around. At this point I am just trying to scale down the plays until the ship rights itself
This system really screwed me so far this season. Played in between a leboucher and martingale chase. My local says he 'feels sorry' for me & doesn't want to take any more bets from me to stop me from losing my $. System should bounce back in a few wks. Need a new local! FML if I can't find one.
0
This system really screwed me so far this season. Played in between a leboucher and martingale chase. My local says he 'feels sorry' for me & doesn't want to take any more bets from me to stop me from losing my $. System should bounce back in a few wks. Need a new local! FML if I can't find one.
This system really screwed me so far this season. Played in between a leboucher and martingale chase. My local says he 'feels sorry' for me & doesn't want to take any more bets from me to stop me from losing my $. System should bounce back in a few wks. Need a new local! FML if I can't find one.
yeah right he is probably just afraid you'll turn it around and kick his ass.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
This system really screwed me so far this season. Played in between a leboucher and martingale chase. My local says he 'feels sorry' for me & doesn't want to take any more bets from me to stop me from losing my $. System should bounce back in a few wks. Need a new local! FML if I can't find one.
yeah right he is probably just afraid you'll turn it around and kick his ass.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.