I'm having a hard time following with consistency though... wasn't Houston a "no play" yesterday due to SLUMP? I saw they entered that game on a 3 game skid. Just wondering if we're abandoning that filter or if it was just missed?
Either way - great system!
0
Hey Chaser,
I'm loving this system!
I'm having a hard time following with consistency though... wasn't Houston a "no play" yesterday due to SLUMP? I saw they entered that game on a 3 game skid. Just wondering if we're abandoning that filter or if it was just missed?
I'm having a hard time following with consistency though... wasn't Houston a "no play" yesterday due to SLUMP? I saw they entered that game on a 3 game skid. Just wondering if we're abandoning that filter or if it was just missed?
Either way - great system!
Dave, thanks, and you are absolutely correct. Houston should have been a "no play" yesterday as well as Baltimore, but I was distracted, overlooked them AGAIN, and luckily made out well on the mistake. I certainly hope my clumsiness didn't cause you BR damage. To answer your question, I am NOT abandoning the "skid" filter as I have found it to be THEE single most reliable filter for my baseball systems...I am, however, considering dropping the "price" filter given the huge dog wins that are occurring (Marlins, and Phills). Thoughts anyone???
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemw23:
Hey Chaser,
I'm loving this system!
I'm having a hard time following with consistency though... wasn't Houston a "no play" yesterday due to SLUMP? I saw they entered that game on a 3 game skid. Just wondering if we're abandoning that filter or if it was just missed?
Either way - great system!
Dave, thanks, and you are absolutely correct. Houston should have been a "no play" yesterday as well as Baltimore, but I was distracted, overlooked them AGAIN, and luckily made out well on the mistake. I certainly hope my clumsiness didn't cause you BR damage. To answer your question, I am NOT abandoning the "skid" filter as I have found it to be THEE single most reliable filter for my baseball systems...I am, however, considering dropping the "price" filter given the huge dog wins that are occurring (Marlins, and Phills). Thoughts anyone???
***Since we hit a new high mark yesterday (albeit small), we have the luxury of re-setting to "A" bets again, and we ARE in this case . Also, I am abandoning the price filter of +150, and will filter out some large dogs on a case-by-case basis (like Braves vs Cubs today, I just don't think they stand any chance). For those who are playing along, congrats on the 30+ unit gain and know that this is right on par with what this system has produced the last few years ive been playing it
0
YTD: +31.18
4/29 Plays: Risk Amt:
Giants +137 1u
Fish -102 1u
Cards +127 1u
Phills +170 1u
CWS +115 1u
Red Sox even 1u
Rangers +110 1u
Tigers +103 1u
A's +120 1u
Filtering out:
Braves SLUMP
Reds SLUMP
Rocks SLUMP
Padres SLUMP
Jays SLUMP
Royals SLUMP
***Since we hit a new high mark yesterday (albeit small), we have the luxury of re-setting to "A" bets again, and we ARE in this case . Also, I am abandoning the price filter of +150, and will filter out some large dogs on a case-by-case basis (like Braves vs Cubs today, I just don't think they stand any chance). For those who are playing along, congrats on the 30+ unit gain and know that this is right on par with what this system has produced the last few years ive been playing it
Nice job with your system. I was going to ask how your over +150 filtered plays were doing and if you tracked them out of "curiosity". I see you have removed that filter and only filter on a case by case basis. Wise choice in my opinion.
Continued success
0
chaser15,
Nice job with your system. I was going to ask how your over +150 filtered plays were doing and if you tracked them out of "curiosity". I see you have removed that filter and only filter on a case by case basis. Wise choice in my opinion.
Nice job with your system. I was going to ask how your over +150 filtered plays were doing and if you tracked them out of "curiosity". I see you have removed that filter and only filter on a case by case basis. Wise choice in my opinion.
Continued success
Oil, thanks....so far the +150 plays are 3-3 for +2.2 units. The yield would be even better (+4.3units) had I played one of those dogs a bit smarter (example: PadresML +240 on Sunday SHOULD have been played on the RL +110). Moving forward, any "huge" dog priced at -110 or less on the RL may make the cut (again, I will semi-cap these plays on a case-by-case basis).
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
chaser15,
Nice job with your system. I was going to ask how your over +150 filtered plays were doing and if you tracked them out of "curiosity". I see you have removed that filter and only filter on a case by case basis. Wise choice in my opinion.
Continued success
Oil, thanks....so far the +150 plays are 3-3 for +2.2 units. The yield would be even better (+4.3units) had I played one of those dogs a bit smarter (example: PadresML +240 on Sunday SHOULD have been played on the RL +110). Moving forward, any "huge" dog priced at -110 or less on the RL may make the cut (again, I will semi-cap these plays on a case-by-case basis).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.