You kill me sdiinc. No- I was actually laughing at the picks you threw up there and you didn't realize one of them was cancelled. But I guess they fit your "formula" right?
0
You kill me sdiinc. No- I was actually laughing at the picks you threw up there and you didn't realize one of them was cancelled. But I guess they fit your "formula" right?
You kill me sdiinc. No- I was actually laughing at the picks you threw up there and you didn't realize one of them was cancelled. But I guess they fit your "formula" right?
If you'll take a look at the date/time stamp, you'll notice the picks were posted before that game was canceled. We would call that result 'no action'.
0
Quote Originally Posted by milkman33:
You kill me sdiinc. No- I was actually laughing at the picks you threw up there and you didn't realize one of them was cancelled. But I guess they fit your "formula" right?
If you'll take a look at the date/time stamp, you'll notice the picks were posted before that game was canceled. We would call that result 'no action'.
I like your idea sdiinc; I am trying to develop a similar system but am having difficulty finding the stats I need. Where do you get your from? I will be betting your system for the near future but want to develop my own. Thanks
0
I like your idea sdiinc; I am trying to develop a similar system but am having difficulty finding the stats I need. Where do you get your from? I will be betting your system for the near future but want to develop my own. Thanks
Good Luck sdiinc. Your formula seems to be picking turning out results. I was wondering if you added any subjectivity to your plays. averaging 5 plays a week hitting 65% using purly a formula is extremely impressive. Good Luck Mark
0
Good Luck sdiinc. Your formula seems to be picking turning out results. I was wondering if you added any subjectivity to your plays. averaging 5 plays a week hitting 65% using purly a formula is extremely impressive. Good Luck Mark
Good Luck sdiinc. Your formula seems to be picking turning out results. I was wondering if you added any subjectivity to your plays. averaging 5 plays a week hitting 65% using purly a formula is extremely impressive. Good Luck Mark
I do not consider situational stuff, the alignment of the stars, how
said coach does on Monday nights or how a team does in a dome when it's
raining, or anything like that.
My evaluation of the lines is a little subjective, but largely based on statistics-obvious stuff like 3.5 vs 3, 6.5 vs 7 or 7.5, 9.5 vs 10, and the probability of any given NFL game to end at a certain spread.
What is subjective is I do not like big lines, even though looking at last year's numbers there doesn't seem to have been much difference in the accuracy of the picks based on a +3 or +10.
If I hear something on ESPN during the week that really scares me, I might avoid the game, but I'm more of a numbers guy than a football guy, and I've usually finished the numbers by Thursday and don't look at them again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Courage:
Good Luck sdiinc. Your formula seems to be picking turning out results. I was wondering if you added any subjectivity to your plays. averaging 5 plays a week hitting 65% using purly a formula is extremely impressive. Good Luck Mark
I do not consider situational stuff, the alignment of the stars, how
said coach does on Monday nights or how a team does in a dome when it's
raining, or anything like that.
My evaluation of the lines is a little subjective, but largely based on statistics-obvious stuff like 3.5 vs 3, 6.5 vs 7 or 7.5, 9.5 vs 10, and the probability of any given NFL game to end at a certain spread.
What is subjective is I do not like big lines, even though looking at last year's numbers there doesn't seem to have been much difference in the accuracy of the picks based on a +3 or +10.
If I hear something on ESPN during the week that really scares me, I might avoid the game, but I'm more of a numbers guy than a football guy, and I've usually finished the numbers by Thursday and don't look at them again.
DomCapper, not sure I can do much with what you've given me. What I would say is that -7.5 might as well be -9.5 from a statistical view; very few games end at 8 or 9 spread.
You might want to shop around some and see if you can get -7 on that one.
It will probably be Saturday before I have NFL picks for week four up; been a busy week at work.
0
DomCapper, not sure I can do much with what you've given me. What I would say is that -7.5 might as well be -9.5 from a statistical view; very few games end at 8 or 9 spread.
You might want to shop around some and see if you can get -7 on that one.
It will probably be Saturday before I have NFL picks for week four up; been a busy week at work.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.