All Forums | Systems & Strategies

How I Made $72,000 in 2008 - FREE System

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15563
Posts: 156
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:



what is the record over 1000 bets? until then, this is flimsy system that may just be going through positive variance

If anybody does not see the irony in the whole system then you are beyond help


EXACTLY

Holy shit, I don't get it. What is wrong with going through positive variance. I'd never go as far as to say this is a freakin money printing strategy for the rest of your life. No fucking way. Just like anything else in life, it's gonna even out. This is not a long term income generating mutual fund here. It's just someone banking on a strong trend that has been hitting consistently.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 174
Posted: #52
What a crazy thread? This guy is simply stating a system that he uses! To me, he makes a valid point and it makes sense. Does that mean you have to bet on it, absolutely not. Did he make 72K last year, who cares? This is a system and strategy forum and he has simply stated his. If you think it is bullshit, then don't waste your time. Go find another system that you believe in and bet that way. Although I personally would never pay for picks, good luck Colonel. It would be good if you would post your picks here and maybe let everyone follow your picks for a little while.
BOL to everyone
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by NCTTC:

What a crazy thread? This guy is simply stating a system that he uses! To me, he makes a valid point and it makes sense. Does that mean you have to bet on it, absolutely not. Did he make 72K last year, who cares? This is a system and strategy forum and he has simply stated his. If you think it is bullshit, then don't waste your time. Go find another system that you believe in and bet that way. Although I personally would never pay for picks, good luck Colonel. It would be good if you would post your picks here and maybe let everyone follow your picks for a little while.
BOL to everyone
 


  There you go. Right on NCTTC .
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 833
Posted: #54
This is called the law of averages....
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 833
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:

there is no proof that the system works. I run simulations on betting markets all day and my computer would laugh at me if I tried to put this in there

what is the record over 1000 bets? until then, this is flimsy system that may just be going through positive variance

If anybody does not see the irony in the whole system then you are beyond help

I was honestly thinking this was a joke and i scroll down and see ill be watching this system closly and all that stuff.. too funny

I still think this thread could be a joke

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 55
Posted: #56

If we hit a casino tonight and won big at blackjack, it certainly wouldn’t disprove the house advantage. I’m not sure if posting my plays will prove anything over the short term. I may have a great couple weeks and look like a guru or have a bad couple weeks and look like a joke. With that being said, I’ve got nothing to hide:

 

MLB

Angels -125

Indians +120

 

NBA

Bullets +10.5

 

NCAAB

Baylor -3.5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 10
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by ColonelDave:

Where can I find this streaks.

I dont understand.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 10
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by ingem:

Where can I find this streaks?

I dont understand.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 174
Posted: #59
Bullets??? Huh???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 174
Posted: #60
Colonel - Do you mean the Wizards?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 55
Posted: #61

A perfect example of doing things yourself if you want it done right. Work frowns upon gambling so I emailed a buddy to post for me before the first game when off.  I guess the “should I post the team names instead of the cities?” question should’ve required a no. He added the leagues too so the city was fine. That’s awesome.

 

P.S. Consider taking the Sonics too.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 174
Posted: #62
I already have money on the Wizards tonight, and I do not bet on MLB preseason. So is your bet on Baylor -3 1/2 a fade on someone who is hot?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 55
Posted: #63
I'm ON Baylor +3.5
 
I've done pretty good with preseason MLB but I have to say "LadyKilla" is pretty good. He had the Cubs today after nine straight wins so I took Cleveland. The Tribe was down 7-1 and almost pulled it out but lost 9-8.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 174
Posted: #64
Starting to believe on the non-believers here. Baylor +3 1/2 ?. I will take that also.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by ColonelDave:

If we hit a casino tonight and won big at blackjack, it certainly wouldn’t disprove the house advantage. I’m not sure if posting my plays will prove anything over the short term. I may have a great couple weeks and look like a guru or have a bad couple weeks and look like a joke. With that being said, I’ve got nothing to hide:

 

MLB

Angels -125

Indians +120

 

NBA

Bullets +10.5

 

NCAAB

Baylor -3.5

I think it would prove a great deal.  Let's see where you are after 100 wagers.  I'm saying down some change, but we will see

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #66
I tell ya something else what would help.  If you put beside your plays the winning streak of the person you are fading.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 55
Posted: #67
I want to help as much as I can. That may be a lot to ask on a daily basis. I'll give it 100% though.
 

Angels -125 (Faded "GinoPazz")

Indians +120 (Faded "LadyKilla")

Wizards +10.5 (Faded "Gino Pazz" & "Sparticus")

Baylor -3.5 (Faded "DSizzle")

 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #68
No, I think Lipps meant how many games in a row the person you are fading has won.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 174
Posted: #69
I really liked this thread, but seems like it is GTS.
 
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by elithepunk:

No, I think Lipps meant how many games in a row the person you are fading has won.


Yep, that's the ticket

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 10
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by ColonelDave:

I want to help as much as I can. That may be a lot to ask on a daily basis. I'll give it 100% though.
 

Angels -125 (Faded "GinoPazz")

Indians +120 (Faded "LadyKilla")

Wizards +10.5 (Faded "Gino Pazz" & "Sparticus")

Baylor -3.5 (Faded "DSizzle")

 

 

Where can I find these bettors?

Here in COVERS?

 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 3087
Posted: #72
System seems logical. Will follow the plays to see how it goes. 

I did something similar to this awhile ago riding the paid cappers free picks during a winning streak and then fading once it lost . Many of them had patterns to their streaks. For instance, some guys would max out around 7 or 8 and then lose 5 or 6 while others would only get to 4 or so and you couldn't really go after that. 

It made some decent money, it just was hell keeping up with it. 

GL on this one 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 307
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by ColonelDave:

SecondAgain - The website I use documents every pick so feel free to research my claims. Simply go back and research the results of the 10 picks that immediately follow a 9 game winning streak and more importantly, the 10 picks that immediately follow a 17-3 run.

 

I recommended starting with no money. I didn’t advise anyone to sink a single dollar into my system on the blind.

 

I also recommended betting 5% of your bankroll if you were convinced. I didn’t start with a specific bankroll but I did start at $300 a game. Within 3 weeks I was ecstatic and at a dime a game. I got as high as 4 dimes a game but the swings had me paranoid. Now I’m at two dimes a game and have been for months.

 

I hit two out of three last night, split the $30 charge for picks with two buddies and netted $1790. Tonight I’ve got two dimes on UTEP -9 at 10:00. They may cover, they may not.

Do me a favor and keep posting your daily picks, I gonna follow you and if I see a pattern I like, I'll bet some myself. Thanks
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2000
Posts: 771
Posted: #74
fading the survivor streaks is something i have done for awhile now
good thing is you can see their % of wins  and what theyre longest streak has been
bad thing is you never know when they will make theyre pick and i have missed alot of picks over the years - i like checking the allstars as well
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 55
Posted: #75

I was late getting home from work today, sorry for the delay. There are a lot of games tonight which tells me most bettors have been doing well recently. I hope you guys enjoyed some of that success. I haven’t.

 

MLB

Tampa Bay +115

LA Dodgers -140

 

NBA

Miami +4.5

Minnesota +13.5

Portland -5

 

NCAAB

Oregon State +9.5

 

NHL

Toronto +250

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.