Posted:
#276
udpert,
I hear what you are saying as there is always some kind of contraversy when a loss occurs.
That series with Detroit supposedly if you waited up until gametime Boston was the favorite. I never saw it either. Detroit was even money but they were -1.5 on the runline.
The Detroit "C" also had contraversy as there was a pitching change which nullified some wagers. I was fortunate I had to go to work early and placed the wager before the pitching change was made. I lucked out.
He put himself in a no lose situation by letting you play Det in G4 "if you choose". Verlander pitched and Francona sat Pedroia and Drew and with Yuke out for the suspension Tigers won 2-0. JM then claimed easy victory. If by chance they would have lost then he would have said Det won G1 anyway.
He always promotes the "unofficial" plays but when KC lost their series he stated thats why you use the filter and only play official plays.
Of course the biggest lie was last year NBA 1st series with Sac. After they lost he changed his link and stated that was only his personal play. To credit of the system, it did go undefeated the rest of the way but he would have more credibility if he would just "man-up" when one of his systems loses.
Last year MLB system lost 5 games yet he claims undefeated (with the new filter).
The other similar situation you are referring to involved Toronto. Same deal they were favored in G2 and lost by 1 run and JM claimed late line movement put Toronto as the underdog.
He then stated to play game 3 and was all happy when Toronto won and claimed 2 wins on 1 series.
Best of Luck
0
Hot Forum Topics
Odds Converter
Parlay
Print
