I hear what you are saying as there is always some kind of contraversy when a loss occurs.
That series with Detroit supposedly if you waited up until gametime Boston was the favorite. I never saw it either. Detroit was even money but they were -1.5 on the runline.
The Detroit "C" also had contraversy as there was a pitching change which nullified some wagers. I was fortunate I had to go to work early and placed the wager before the pitching change was made. I lucked out.
He put himself in a no lose situation by letting you play Det in G4 "if you choose". Verlander pitched and Francona sat Pedroia and Drew and with Yuke out for the suspension Tigers won 2-0. JM then claimed easy victory. If by chance they would have lost then he would have said Det won G1 anyway.
He always promotes the "unofficial" plays but when KC lost their series he stated thats why you use the filter and only play official plays.
Of course the biggest lie was last year NBA 1st series with Sac. After they lost he changed his link and stated that was only his personal play. To credit of the system, it did go undefeated the rest of the way but he would have more credibility if he would just "man-up" when one of his systems loses.
Last year MLB system lost 5 games yet he claims undefeated (with the new filter).
The other similar situation you are referring to involved Toronto. Same deal they were favored in G2 and lost by 1 run and JM claimed late line movement put Toronto as the underdog.
He then stated to play game 3 and was all happy when Toronto won and claimed 2 wins on 1 series.
Best of Luck
0
udpert,
I hear what you are saying as there is always some kind of contraversy when a loss occurs.
That series with Detroit supposedly if you waited up until gametime Boston was the favorite. I never saw it either. Detroit was even money but they were -1.5 on the runline.
The Detroit "C" also had contraversy as there was a pitching change which nullified some wagers. I was fortunate I had to go to work early and placed the wager before the pitching change was made. I lucked out.
He put himself in a no lose situation by letting you play Det in G4 "if you choose". Verlander pitched and Francona sat Pedroia and Drew and with Yuke out for the suspension Tigers won 2-0. JM then claimed easy victory. If by chance they would have lost then he would have said Det won G1 anyway.
He always promotes the "unofficial" plays but when KC lost their series he stated thats why you use the filter and only play official plays.
Of course the biggest lie was last year NBA 1st series with Sac. After they lost he changed his link and stated that was only his personal play. To credit of the system, it did go undefeated the rest of the way but he would have more credibility if he would just "man-up" when one of his systems loses.
Last year MLB system lost 5 games yet he claims undefeated (with the new filter).
The other similar situation you are referring to involved Toronto. Same deal they were favored in G2 and lost by 1 run and JM claimed late line movement put Toronto as the underdog.
He then stated to play game 3 and was all happy when Toronto won and claimed 2 wins on 1 series.
Man Damn you Boston on the making of our PERFECT 5 - 0
I guess we will have to settle for the 4 wins and catch Boston a lil later................
Whats really extremely amazing to me is how many underdogs & unofficial plays we had tonight that not only covered BUT WON without even needing the plus 1 1/2...............
IT FEELS DAMN GOOD TO HAVE A NIGHT LIKE THIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STRIKE UP THE BAND YALL IM BOUT TA CUT THE RUG !!!!!!!
WE ARE ALL DEFINITELY IN IT TO WIN IT
CONGRATS TO ALL WHO BANKED TONIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Oh and by the way YALL
Can I get a WHOOP WHOOP !!!!!!!!!!!
Man Damn you Boston on the making of our PERFECT 5 - 0
I guess we will have to settle for the 4 wins and catch Boston a lil later................
Whats really extremely amazing to me is how many underdogs & unofficial plays we had tonight that not only covered BUT WON without even needing the plus 1 1/2...............
IT FEELS DAMN GOOD TO HAVE A NIGHT LIKE THIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STRIKE UP THE BAND YALL IM BOUT TA CUT THE RUG !!!!!!!
WE ARE ALL DEFINITELY IN IT TO WIN IT
CONGRATS TO ALL WHO BANKED TONIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i think its V3 phillies tomorrow (unofficial bet and the previously swept team won with RPI diff of .025 or more) and v2 for boston (home team lost by 3+ runs at home with RPI diff of only .010). can anyone confirm?
0
i think its V3 phillies tomorrow (unofficial bet and the previously swept team won with RPI diff of .025 or more) and v2 for boston (home team lost by 3+ runs at home with RPI diff of only .010). can anyone confirm?
I had major cake at risk yesterday and was sweating just a little bit.....how happy am I to only have to place a B bet today on an unofficial play.
Some of you guys can down play JM all you want and say this or that about whoever he is....but I gotta tell ya, if you play these plays without any emotion like I do because I know diddly squat about sports, your apt to do better than you've ever done following your own advice.
The key here is to simply understand that this is an algorithm or better known in the investing world of Wall St. as Black Box trading. It's what the smartest minds on the Street use like Goldman Sachs to make Billions without alot of risk.....Hedge Fund stuff if you catch the drift.
When your system says that your odds are as high as they are on the A , B and C level bets....just play with your bank roll at stake in a smart way but play all of the plays period end.
And you know what....I forget who said it but they were right when they said that they were just going to sign up for one of the other JM subscriptions because they wouldn't need to figure out which plays fall into the series that need to be bet on and spend all their time doing it.
I'm kind of feeling the same way but just gotta decide which one i may want to sign up for since somebody already posted the WNBA for all of the future plays this year....and who cares how much of a scammer JM might be, you should be grateful that you took the advice and made cake from it.
0
I had major cake at risk yesterday and was sweating just a little bit.....how happy am I to only have to place a B bet today on an unofficial play.
Some of you guys can down play JM all you want and say this or that about whoever he is....but I gotta tell ya, if you play these plays without any emotion like I do because I know diddly squat about sports, your apt to do better than you've ever done following your own advice.
The key here is to simply understand that this is an algorithm or better known in the investing world of Wall St. as Black Box trading. It's what the smartest minds on the Street use like Goldman Sachs to make Billions without alot of risk.....Hedge Fund stuff if you catch the drift.
When your system says that your odds are as high as they are on the A , B and C level bets....just play with your bank roll at stake in a smart way but play all of the plays period end.
And you know what....I forget who said it but they were right when they said that they were just going to sign up for one of the other JM subscriptions because they wouldn't need to figure out which plays fall into the series that need to be bet on and spend all their time doing it.
I'm kind of feeling the same way but just gotta decide which one i may want to sign up for since somebody already posted the WNBA for all of the future plays this year....and who cares how much of a scammer JM might be, you should be grateful that you took the advice and made cake from it.
Looks like only one "Official RPI" Play. Maybe some V2 and V3 Opps though.
8/25-8/27: Pit (Swept by Phi on 7/10-7/12) 8/25-8/27: Was (Swept by ChiC on 7/16-7/19) 8/28-8/30: SD (Swept by Fla on 7/20-7/22) 8/28-8/30: Cin (Swept by LAD on 7/20-7/22) 8/28-8/30: Mil (Swept by Pit on 8/17-8/19) 8/28-8/30: Tor (Swept by Bos on 8/18-8/20
0
Looks like only one "Official RPI" Play. Maybe some V2 and V3 Opps though.
8/25-8/27: Pit (Swept by Phi on 7/10-7/12) 8/25-8/27: Was (Swept by ChiC on 7/16-7/19) 8/28-8/30: SD (Swept by Fla on 7/20-7/22) 8/28-8/30: Cin (Swept by LAD on 7/20-7/22) 8/28-8/30: Mil (Swept by Pit on 8/17-8/19) 8/28-8/30: Tor (Swept by Bos on 8/18-8/20
The MLB system ends technically in about 1 week. Football wont kick in till MLB regular season ends.
However, there is a lot of baseball left. Will anyone be chasing the games that might come up in september. I know there are more than a couple. I know some teams are out of it, but I don't think players tank it b/c their stats carry with them for life and you are always playing for your next contract.
What about other MLB chases?:
I am thinking about fading the Cubs and Jays in all of their remaining series. They have no heart and have terrible bullpens, and have no real shot to make the playoffs even though you see them lumped into wilcard lists. They do have good enough records where the odds won't be too high on the teams playing them (like teams that face the Nats).
Come playoff time, seems you could chase the most solid teams to win at least one of the 1st 3 games in their series.
0
The MLB system ends technically in about 1 week. Football wont kick in till MLB regular season ends.
However, there is a lot of baseball left. Will anyone be chasing the games that might come up in september. I know there are more than a couple. I know some teams are out of it, but I don't think players tank it b/c their stats carry with them for life and you are always playing for your next contract.
What about other MLB chases?:
I am thinking about fading the Cubs and Jays in all of their remaining series. They have no heart and have terrible bullpens, and have no real shot to make the playoffs even though you see them lumped into wilcard lists. They do have good enough records where the odds won't be too high on the teams playing them (like teams that face the Nats).
Come playoff time, seems you could chase the most solid teams to win at least one of the 1st 3 games in their series.
I think the redbirds are primed to boost the bankroll because they are peaking right now and are hungry. Definately a team worth chasing from here on out. Also fading the Yankees from here on out as they are 27 and 7 since the All Star break. With the juice you will get its seems like a no brainer. You cant continue to win in baseball at higher than a .750 clip.
0
I think the redbirds are primed to boost the bankroll because they are peaking right now and are hungry. Definately a team worth chasing from here on out. Also fading the Yankees from here on out as they are 27 and 7 since the All Star break. With the juice you will get its seems like a no brainer. You cant continue to win in baseball at higher than a .750 clip.
V2.0 System Update In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series. The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible. Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play. Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play: On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play. You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point. Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference
This is what I was looking for...................
(I couldnt remember if it was here or on that other)
THANKS AGAIN KONG !!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
I got it guys! NBA V2
Thank the Kong! I found this on SBR forum!
V2.0 System Update In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get a little less strict on the filter for our 3-game series. The v1.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against 3 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible. Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as there are at least 2 teams that are from the opposite conference out of the 3 consecutive road games, then it is enough to make the series to be profitable for play. Here’s an example from the 2008-09 NBA season with the v2.0 system coming into play: On October 31st, the Golden State Warriors started a 3-game series on the road against Toronto, New Jersey, and Memphis, respectively. Toronto and New Jersey are teams from the opposite conference of Golden State; while Memphis is in their same conference. However, since at least two teams out of the three are from the opposite conference, this is enough to make the series eligible for play. You would then make the [A] bet for Golden State on October 31st in their game versus Toronto, and buy 3 points on top of the spread just like you’d normally do. Sure enough, Golden State won on the [A] play. We stop betting on this series at this point. Basically, everything about the v2.0 system remains the same, except for the fact a series is eligible for play as long as at least 2 out of the 3 teams are from the opposite conference, rather than requiring that ALL 3 teams must be from the opposite conference
This is what I was looking for...................
(I couldnt remember if it was here or on that other)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.