A good capper NEVER has this many bets on a given day.. this loses some credibility with me.. but oh well.. what do I know....
__________________________________________
Actually.. (I come back to write this after I have all ready written the rest of this post) DJ said he is an Action junkie and has to have action on a lot of games.. while this is the typical attitude of most gamblers, I'm disappointed DJ falls into this category. He's all ready said MULTIPLE times, that the big money plays are winners, while the action junkie plays are losers. So.. come on DJ.. just give us the Winners.. an fuck the junkie plays. I challenge you, to that._______________________________
At this rate tho, with DJ playing $50, $100, and $200 Unit games.. even if he only goes like 50%, he'll absolutely DESTROY Supereagle while he plays for his $10 Units..
Therefore.. this makes this "contest" completely unfair.. Eagle should be able to play similar Unit sizes, or DJ should be restricted to smaller maximum wagers.. way smaller than $700.. altho I have to give credit, once again, to DJ for his discipline of not having a huge play, thus far. I think his Dodgers play tonight is his largest play, yet?
Either way.. This WILL be a bloodbath by the end, and DJ will roll.. however, this does NOT mean his style is best.. it just means it's better than Eagles.. That doesn't mean Eagle's is bad. There's many ways to skin a calf....
That being said.. it looks like Eagle is going on a level 4 or 5 play, I think?? That is the only way Eagle has a chance of winning this contest.. by losing 5 or 6 in a row, then hitting the 6th or 7th wager for a big grand martingale win.. multiple times.... the grand martingale fucking sucks by the way.. ride it while it's hot, but like DJ said (reluctantly agree, considering my own approach to Martingale).. it's destined to fail, and will bankrupt you in the end. Bottom Line. Period. Enough Said.
Eagle I know you'll be mad at this, considering I Pm'ed you about DJ's philosophy.. but in the end, this style in shit. The argument you do have, however, is that DJ clearly relates his Martingale experience to Roulette (it's clearly obvious this way because he doesn't even change the word "spins" from his copy an paste efforts..) So this clearly exemplifies that DJ has no CURRENT understanding of the Martingale System. It's OK.. neither do 90% of the general population. While Martingale is a "destined to fail" System for ROULETTE.. people don't seem to realize the benefit of this money management when you have an edge over the house. And having a proven System GIVES YOU AN EDGE OVER THE HOUSE. I think DJ will agree (actually I think he all ready has, previously) that a Martingale System will prosper, if you have an edge over the house. However, rarely will you ever see such a case.. Therefore I give DJ credit on his analysis.. altho not in MY particular case.... I continue (and will continue), to prove that a MODIFIED MARTINGALE can be a successful Money Management System when you know what you're doing. Sports Investing is in no way, shape or form, similar to roulette.. if you are a successful handicapper, you often have an edge over the house. Therefore, comparing a Martingale System between Roulette, and Sports Investing, is really - to be blunt - stupid.
Like I said before.. it sucks cheering for a System to lose 4 or 5 in a row, before hitting a big win.
Someone bit off more than they can chew.. just to try and prove a point.. an it is gonna come back to bite them in the ass, in the end. But who really cares.. it's not like this "contest" is for anything other than bragging rights..
I would be more interested in this if there was actually something on the line..
Where the fuck is sportsbath when you need him.. He called me out.. I think we could have a much more interesting contest....
If you're out there, sportsbath buddy, create another account and pm me.. well do it up right ;)
Mmm.. cereal is good.
Hot Forum Topics
