To those of you who followed this last season, basically, the same as last year:
Using the RL Parlay, this will be a Limited Chase Parlay.
The first bet will be N Units amount. If it wins, then the next bet is the same amount at N Units. Basically after a winning bet, then the following bet is automatically the same amount N Units.
If it is a loss then you increase the bet incrementally until the fifth bet as follows: 2nd bet N*1.4 Units, 3rd bet N*1.29 Units, 4th bet N*1.22 Units, and the final 5th bet is N*1.18 Units. Obviously after a win then it goes back to N Units bet on the next bet after the win.
Today's play for Monday-April 6, 2015:
NY Mets +1.5 -160 & Chicago White Sox +1.5 -210 Risking 100 To Win 140
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
To those of you who followed this last season, basically, the same as last year:
Using the RL Parlay, this will be a Limited Chase Parlay.
The first bet will be N Units amount. If it wins, then the next bet is the same amount at N Units. Basically after a winning bet, then the following bet is automatically the same amount N Units.
If it is a loss then you increase the bet incrementally until the fifth bet as follows: 2nd bet N*1.4 Units, 3rd bet N*1.29 Units, 4th bet N*1.22 Units, and the final 5th bet is N*1.18 Units. Obviously after a win then it goes back to N Units bet on the next bet after the win.
Today's play for Monday-April 6, 2015:
NY Mets +1.5 -160 & Chicago White Sox +1.5 -210 Risking 100 To Win 140
So far so good for tonight. Atlanta won 2-0. The Cincinnati game was delayed by 2 hours and it just started. After 1 inning Cincinnati is leading 1-0 as Gerrit Cole gave up a solo home run in the bottom of the 1st inning to Cincinnati's Todd Frazier.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jcpicos:
good luck today
So far so good for tonight. Atlanta won 2-0. The Cincinnati game was delayed by 2 hours and it just started. After 1 inning Cincinnati is leading 1-0 as Gerrit Cole gave up a solo home run in the bottom of the 1st inning to Cincinnati's Todd Frazier.
Both have been profitable for me for the two years I tested them (2013 and 2014).
If you go on a hot streak let's say some time during the season you hit le't say six straight or eight straight then the 2-win streak parlay is more money. I utilize both almost everyday, except when there are days that I just don't like the RL underdog matchups for the games on that particular day.
Today was unfortunate. Matt Harvey as an RL underdog that was just begging to be picked as part of the parlay since the NY Mets ace is Cy Young caliber. But hey Washington's Strassburg is no slouch and is a Cy Young caliber pitcher as well, it's just that for the most part the NY Mets seem to have his number more than half the time he faced them in his career, and that was before the Mets added some quality hitting from Colorado.
As for the Chicago White Sox, the starter Johnny Danks for most of his career owned the KC Royals. The current Royals line up was batting .159 against Johnny Danks. He did pretty okay giving up 4 runs. But I expected the White Sox to produce at least 3 runs in the game. But there was no run support. Coincidentally, the White Sox/Royals game was the only series in all 15 series openers where the RL Favorite covered each of their first three games. Well, time to keep them in mind and avoid them because no run support is dangerous to RL Dogs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jcpicos:
what is the most profitable system 5 or 2 ??
Both have been profitable for me for the two years I tested them (2013 and 2014).
If you go on a hot streak let's say some time during the season you hit le't say six straight or eight straight then the 2-win streak parlay is more money. I utilize both almost everyday, except when there are days that I just don't like the RL underdog matchups for the games on that particular day.
Today was unfortunate. Matt Harvey as an RL underdog that was just begging to be picked as part of the parlay since the NY Mets ace is Cy Young caliber. But hey Washington's Strassburg is no slouch and is a Cy Young caliber pitcher as well, it's just that for the most part the NY Mets seem to have his number more than half the time he faced them in his career, and that was before the Mets added some quality hitting from Colorado.
As for the Chicago White Sox, the starter Johnny Danks for most of his career owned the KC Royals. The current Royals line up was batting .159 against Johnny Danks. He did pretty okay giving up 4 runs. But I expected the White Sox to produce at least 3 runs in the game. But there was no run support. Coincidentally, the White Sox/Royals game was the only series in all 15 series openers where the RL Favorite covered each of their first three games. Well, time to keep them in mind and avoid them because no run support is dangerous to RL Dogs.
Both have been profitable for me for the two years I tested them (2013 and 2014).
If you go on a hot streak let's say some time during the season you hit le't say six straight or eight straight then the 2-win streak parlay is more money. I utilize both almost everyday, except when there are days that I just don't like the RL underdog matchups for the games on that particular day.
Today was unfortunate. Matt Harvey as an RL underdog that was just begging to be picked as part of the parlay since the NY Mets ace is Cy Young caliber. But hey Washington's Strassburg is no slouch and is a Cy Young caliber pitcher as well, it's just that for the most part the NY Mets seem to have his number more than half the time he faced them in his career, and that was before the Mets added some quality hitting from Colorado.
As for the Chicago White Sox, the starter Johnny Danks for most of his career owned the KC Royals. The current Royals line up was batting .159 against Johnny Danks. He did pretty okay giving up 4 runs. But I expected the White Sox to produce at least 3 runs in the game. But there was no run support. Coincidentally, the White Sox/Royals game was the only series in all 15 series openers where the RL Favorite covered each of their first three games. Well, time to keep them in mind and avoid them because no run support is dangerous to RL Dogs.
thnaks for the answer amigo
0
Quote Originally Posted by JoeMahirap:
Both have been profitable for me for the two years I tested them (2013 and 2014).
If you go on a hot streak let's say some time during the season you hit le't say six straight or eight straight then the 2-win streak parlay is more money. I utilize both almost everyday, except when there are days that I just don't like the RL underdog matchups for the games on that particular day.
Today was unfortunate. Matt Harvey as an RL underdog that was just begging to be picked as part of the parlay since the NY Mets ace is Cy Young caliber. But hey Washington's Strassburg is no slouch and is a Cy Young caliber pitcher as well, it's just that for the most part the NY Mets seem to have his number more than half the time he faced them in his career, and that was before the Mets added some quality hitting from Colorado.
As for the Chicago White Sox, the starter Johnny Danks for most of his career owned the KC Royals. The current Royals line up was batting .159 against Johnny Danks. He did pretty okay giving up 4 runs. But I expected the White Sox to produce at least 3 runs in the game. But there was no run support. Coincidentally, the White Sox/Royals game was the only series in all 15 series openers where the RL Favorite covered each of their first three games. Well, time to keep them in mind and avoid them because no run support is dangerous to RL Dogs.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
