All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Mlb chase underdog system

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 49711
Posts: 187
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 225
Posted: #51
Whatever happpened to this thread?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 528
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by darkstar77:

Whatever happpened to this thread?

Personally.. I have taken the info and created a 'one play each new set of series' system with it (max 2 plays).

Still early in the season so unsure how it will pan out, so far so good… no juice and picking winners is quite enjoyable.

Added a few other simple little stats to look at to help with the deciding to play.

The key is to pick a dog a that will avoid the sweep… ideally like any system you wanna win on the A game as well. 

Highly recommend the info in post 1..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #53
Any update on your progress goodsy? 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 528
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by rivermonsterz:

Any update on your progress goodsy? 

All in all it's going really well and it's the only type of MLB betting I will be/am doing…

Though I did stuff up during the middle of the season which cost me..I see it has all part of the learning process but I can honestly say this is the way to go.. just pick 1 or 2 dogs per new set of plays. If you play too many you will land in the crap.

Just put together some basic batting and pitching criteria.. look at the scheduled starters.. keep an eye on injuries. Be careful with your money management and you should be sweet.

As for MM.. I recommend not going on aggressive labby now. Martingale works great… though have a think about a recovery process too as you will need it. Don't set your stating unit amount too high otherwise you will burn yourself.

Whatever happens.. don;t get overconfident.. while it;s easy.. it;s also difficult. You think one series will be easy and you end up getting swept. Just learn from the losses.

There needs to be thought and reasoning behind the selections. Don't just pick big dogs otherwise it will eff up.

Have learnt much this season and am really excited about next season already.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1924
Posted: #55

Seems pretty straight forward..Tho' I see no reason to have such large bets..Taking a $7,000 bankroll and betting $1,000 on game 1 seems pretty crazy.

Take $7,000 and break it up into 20 $350 units maybe. You could even afford to run a couple chases at a time and still not go broke if something catastrophic happens.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6
Posted: #56
i like the look of this may give it a shot next season
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 528
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by Wildbill2545:

i like the look of this may give it a shot next season

Absolutely mate.. it is good a method. Though be careful with your selections.. incorporate some, even basic, handicapping and you should be sweet.

Just keep in mind, the more plays you make per round, the more chance you have of being swept.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 56
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by Goodsy:


Absolutely mate.. it is good a method. Though be careful with your selections.. incorporate some, even basic, handicapping and you should be sweet.

Just keep in mind, the more plays you make per round, the more chance you have of being swept.


This is my first ever covers post. I see how this system could work, but would like some help getting started with it in the 2016 MLB season.  Did you try it again in 2015 season with decent results?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 719
Posted: #59
i will give this a shot at posting plays. i went and backtracked dogs from the last 2 years and found some consistant ones.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 26
Posted: #60
This system seems to be quite logical and makes sense, even in it's original form using the given parameters.  It could be worth a shot!

Coolspot you originally posted plays then stopped (TOR A & TB A, TOR A & TB B).  I looked back at the results and I think TOR B was a winner and TB B was postponed.  When TB played the makeup game they won!   
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 719
Posted: #61
I didn't play or post much last year my computer got fried.  now I have a new computer.  I will be posting.  also going to give the my over under system another try.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 26
Posted: #62
I wonder if there could be a way to translate this system to the NHL? It would take a little more work in that you would have to see how travelling teams do in multiple arenas in 3-4 game road trips.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 688
Posted: #63
As a collective effort it would be nice to identify which 3-game series apply to this criteria for 2016 which starts Sunday.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 1068
Posted: #64
The only teams that look like they would be away underdogs for the three game set is: 

Philly@ Cinny
Colorado@ Arz

Not enough stats to filter system play, maybe start 5/1/16
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 719
Posted: #65
I'm waiting about 10 games into regular season
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 688
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by 1Gamer:

The only teams that look like they would be away underdogs for the three game set is: 

Philly@ Cinny
Colorado@ Arz

Not enough stats to filter system play, maybe start 5/1/16


I think SF @ Mil would qualify as well.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 688
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by Nuscas:



I think SF @ Mil would qualify as well.


Min @ Bal looks good too, but questionable weather.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #68
This looks good to me. Intriguing.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 6
Posted: #69
What do you guys think about Seattle?

They lost today and looks like they're going to be dogs tomorrow
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2016
Posts: 2
Posted: #70
I like this idea. Let's keep some communication going and go for it! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 26
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by jmt41288:

I like this idea. Let's keep some communication going and go for it! 

I really like this system as well as it actually makes sense and you can actually look back to check how it did (if you wanted to).  I wonder when the best time to start it would be though?  Right now this early in the season you only have head-to-head stats to go on.  Maybe when 10 games have been played we could look seriously into starting.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 719
Posted: #72
i'm  waiting for 10 days in for sure.  I might just start a nother thread and post dogs cause I found different stuff that came in over the last 2 years.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2016
Posts: 2
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Sask:


I really like this system as well as it actually makes sense and you can actually look back to check how it did (if you wanted to).  I wonder when the best time to start it would be though?  Right now this early in the season you only have head-to-head stats to go on.  Maybe when 10 games have been played we could look seriously into starting.

Well I would like to be a part of the ride.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 26
Posted: #74
I also like that it could only be a 3-4 game chase as opposed to a 7-8 game chase where you lose your entire bankroll!  

Hopefully, as the original author stated, picking the right away teams using the given parameters will leave you with a really large percentage of away teams winning 1/3 or 1/4 games and an extremely small probability of getting swept!
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 719
Posted: #75
I went back the last 2 years and also found some home teams playing on the   -1.5  line.  i'm  going to start another thread and attempt to explain what I came  up with.  i'm waiting 10 games in,  it's a 3 game chase  which i know you guys are going to love.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.