Seems we have some demand for a RL following as well. So from here on out I'm going to post the RL with Units as well. I personally don't play the RL but if it comes to fruition, heck, I just may some day. I'll do my best with that RL UNit thing ok.
Also, It looks as though we have one series starting tomorrow, so far. CHW@ LAA. I always double check the morning of the beginning of a series because that RPI changes a lot the first half of the season.
Take LAA
0
Seems we have some demand for a RL following as well. So from here on out I'm going to post the RL with Units as well. I personally don't play the RL but if it comes to fruition, heck, I just may some day. I'll do my best with that RL UNit thing ok.
Also, It looks as though we have one series starting tomorrow, so far. CHW@ LAA. I always double check the morning of the beginning of a series because that RPI changes a lot the first half of the season.
awesome bro! I will start that thread underthe straight up plays. so that system, staring this weekend is up 6 units. Ok. Im guna try it too along w/my straight plays. Even if FLA lost today, I think u woulda still been up right?
0
awesome bro! I will start that thread underthe straight up plays. so that system, staring this weekend is up 6 units. Ok. Im guna try it too along w/my straight plays. Even if FLA lost today, I think u woulda still been up right?
I know the numbers are "not exact" for the labby but they are pretty close; as with martingale. +/-1% error rate. If numbers are off. Please look at winning percentage to figure out if this is for you.
0
Totals:
Straight up
A Game Wins: 6
B Game Wins: 5
C Game Wins: 1
Losses: 0
Record: 12-0
Martingale: +12 Units. Labby +8 Units
A Games are down 4 units on the Labby
B Games are down 1 Unit on the Labby
Run Line
A Game wins: 1
B Game wins: 2
C Game Wins: 1
Loses: 0
Season: 4-0
+6Units (started the weekend of Friday 5/6/11)
Will keep track of Mart/labby from here on out
I know the numbers are "not exact" for the labby but they are pretty close; as with martingale. +/-1% error rate. If numbers are off. Please look at winning percentage to figure out if this is for you.
I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here. I've read this thread a couple times. First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it. Looks like an interesting system. Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics. When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount. If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet? so that you cover your intial loss? And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets? I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.
0
I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here. I've read this thread a couple times. First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it. Looks like an interesting system. Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics. When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount. If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet? so that you cover your intial loss? And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets? I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.
I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here. I've read this thread a couple times. First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it. Looks like an interesting system. Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics. When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount. If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet? so that you cover your intial loss? And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets? I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.
It's my understanding that that is correct. Just a chase.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bueller1978:
I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here. I've read this thread a couple times. First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it. Looks like an interesting system. Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics. When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount. If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet? so that you cover your intial loss? And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets? I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.
It's my understanding that that is correct. Just a chase.
I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here. I've read this thread a couple times. First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it. Looks like an interesting system. Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics. When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount. If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet? so that you cover your intial loss? And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets? I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.
Well, you can Labby or Martingale this system. The Martingale seems to produce faster results..Obviously. I tend to Labby at times and at others I tend to Martingale (double up the bet). But once last year I was bitten by the double up system right at the all star break with Texas losing 4 straight to Baltimore. Just to shed a little light..I tend to Labby when juice is really high and doubling up ruins your bankroll if you lose. A great example of that was last year when PIT played @ COL. Col juice was extremely high for absolutely no reason, IMO. Higher than normal. I tend to chase when a great/really good team is on the road due to less juice than playing at home.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bueller1978:
I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here. I've read this thread a couple times. First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it. Looks like an interesting system. Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics. When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount. If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet? so that you cover your intial loss? And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets? I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.
Well, you can Labby or Martingale this system. The Martingale seems to produce faster results..Obviously. I tend to Labby at times and at others I tend to Martingale (double up the bet). But once last year I was bitten by the double up system right at the all star break with Texas losing 4 straight to Baltimore. Just to shed a little light..I tend to Labby when juice is really high and doubling up ruins your bankroll if you lose. A great example of that was last year when PIT played @ COL. Col juice was extremely high for absolutely no reason, IMO. Higher than normal. I tend to chase when a great/really good team is on the road due to less juice than playing at home.
i found your system here and like it but in your rules u say
If the lower RPI has been playing significantly better baseball over the last week or so, do not play the series
and TB been very good as of late actually won last 4 and have only lost 4 on the road all yr. they are 7-3 last 10
this series like a pretty even matchup except for the rpi and TB has to be so low because of the fact TB last 8 of first 9 games but since then have been amazing and only lost 6 more since. I do think that clev dont get swept but just wanted to ask
0
i found your system here and like it but in your rules u say
If the lower RPI has been playing significantly better baseball over the last week or so, do not play the series
and TB been very good as of late actually won last 4 and have only lost 4 on the road all yr. they are 7-3 last 10
this series like a pretty even matchup except for the rpi and TB has to be so low because of the fact TB last 8 of first 9 games but since then have been amazing and only lost 6 more since. I do think that clev dont get swept but just wanted to ask
i found your system here and like it but in your rules u say
If the lower RPI has been playing significantly better baseball over the last week or so, do not play the series
and TB been very good as of late actually won last 4 and have only lost 4 on the road all yr. they are 7-3 last 10
this series like a pretty even matchup except for the rpi and TB has to be so low because of the fact TB last 8 of first 9 games but since then have been amazing and only lost 6 more since. I do think that clev dont get swept but just wanted to ask
Same question.
0
Quote Originally Posted by huskerfan74:
i found your system here and like it but in your rules u say
If the lower RPI has been playing significantly better baseball over the last week or so, do not play the series
and TB been very good as of late actually won last 4 and have only lost 4 on the road all yr. they are 7-3 last 10
this series like a pretty even matchup except for the rpi and TB has to be so low because of the fact TB last 8 of first 9 games but since then have been amazing and only lost 6 more since. I do think that clev dont get swept but just wanted to ask
Husker you have a great reason for a "No Play" here according to what I wrote. I do see that whem TB got Longoria back they are a rejuvenated team as well. Clv has been playing 500 ball in its last 8 or so games I believe. But the reason I took them as a play is because Clv hasnt started a "slide" yet. I believe Clv will eventially, and I also believe TB will make a run. So why the pick??? Because Clv hasnt been playn horrible. They have shown signs of life.
0
Husker you have a great reason for a "No Play" here according to what I wrote. I do see that whem TB got Longoria back they are a rejuvenated team as well. Clv has been playing 500 ball in its last 8 or so games I believe. But the reason I took them as a play is because Clv hasnt started a "slide" yet. I believe Clv will eventially, and I also believe TB will make a run. So why the pick??? Because Clv hasnt been playn horrible. They have shown signs of life.
i deff agree that Clev would win a game in this series was just being sure io understood what you had put.. i try not to run more then one series at a time cause not bnig enough bankroll to cover losses on both if both go to 3rd game lol.. GL.. to be honest i think anyone could bet this series for both teams i cant see either sweeping but thats based only on what i think from recent form of both teams
0
i deff agree that Clev would win a game in this series was just being sure io understood what you had put.. i try not to run more then one series at a time cause not bnig enough bankroll to cover losses on both if both go to 3rd game lol.. GL.. to be honest i think anyone could bet this series for both teams i cant see either sweeping but thats based only on what i think from recent form of both teams
just an fyi... seems the mlb rpi is tighter this year than last couple years. TB should come up and a few scrub teams should fall KC, PiT, Bal. lets see though. Let the MLB RPI system God decide.
0
just an fyi... seems the mlb rpi is tighter this year than last couple years. TB should come up and a few scrub teams should fall KC, PiT, Bal. lets see though. Let the MLB RPI system God decide.
so i dont understand what you are betting as far as runline .. if in the clev series u bet runline last night on clev it was a loss they were the dog and deff didnt cover +1.5. i am not ready to bet runline just yet as its much more risky but just curious how you are doing it.. or are you on c bet on that series for rl?
0
so i dont understand what you are betting as far as runline .. if in the clev series u bet runline last night on clev it was a loss they were the dog and deff didnt cover +1.5. i am not ready to bet runline just yet as its much more risky but just curious how you are doing it.. or are you on c bet on that series for rl?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.