All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB RPI SYSTEM 2012

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 405880
Posts: 2966
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 41
Posted: #1001
Forget what I said. For some reason my spreadsheet had SF at 10-12 instead of 12-10
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2000
Posts: 100
Posted: #1002

I have ATL(h) = +111, WAS(h) = +49, SF(h) = +47

W/L looks okay. What wrong?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1003

2012
BETTOR2WIN MLB RPI SYSTEM


MLB RPI Rankings
https://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

RPI Chase Worksheet
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzZqK3HKsP7cVG1OYTVtak05OTg/edit?pli=1

Percentage Calculator
https://www.marshu.com/articles/calculate-percent-with-simple-number-percentage-calculator.php


VISITOR = < 50 RPI
HOME = < 42 RPI

APRIL

4/28 - (A) Dodgers .727 +124 (V69) - LOSS
4/28 - (A) Texas .727 -145 (V102) - WIN
4/28 - (A) Mets .591 -113 (V80) - LOSS

MAY

4/28 - (B) Dodgers .727 +124 (H69) - PENDING
4/28 - (B) Mets .591 -113 (V80) - PENDING
4/28 - (A) San Francisco .524 -148 (H52) - PENDING

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 16
Posted: #1004
rp-rt, WASH is +37 no +49
I think ATL is not a game because of the 4 games difference between them and Philadelphia no ?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1005

I have listed the official plays today. There is chatter about others.

Cincinnati, I am not taking. I think Cincy has improved, but so have the Cubs, it seems like an easy pick, but it smells wrong, so I am passing.

Atlanta, same boat. They play good at home and Philly is getting better despite some early injuries. This is a gut call, it just doesn't feel right.

Washington on the other hand has been playing exceptional well. With the Diamondbacks travelling across country, I like them.

UNOFFICIAL PICK

4/28 - (A) Washington .636 -143 (H59) - PENDING

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1006
Opps, Washington RPI is only 37, but it doesn't change my opinon.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1007

Hey guys, be careful today. Covers web site is jacked up.

I started noticing some problems a couple of weeks ago and today it is really messed up.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1008
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

Hey guys, be careful today. Covers web site is jacked up.

I started noticing some problems a couple of weeks ago and today it is really messed up.


What do you mean bro by jacked up? Goodluck to us all! Hope we clean the boards tonight!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1009

The stats were all messed up. I ogged out and back in and everything seems better now.

I've seen missing posts, formatting issues and stats that have been wrong over the past few weeks.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 424
Posted: #1010
Quote Originally Posted by rp-rt:

I have ATL(h) = +111, WAS(h) = +49, SF(h) = +47

W/L looks okay. What wrong?


You're math is way off on all of those games is what's wrong. Just wait for the plays to be given to you.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2000
Posts: 100
Posted: #1011

Thanks zcecil,

espn must have not updated rpi when I did the math. Now i've got ATL=97 But W/L is close but low. WAS=37. SF=55 W/L is good. So SF is only play. ATL is tempting though. It is very close.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 424
Posted: #1012
Quote Originally Posted by rp-rt:

Thanks zcecil,

espn must have not updated rpi when I did the math. Now i've got ATL=97 But W/L is close but low. WAS=37. SF=55 W/L is good. So SF is only play. ATL is tempting though. It is very close.


Feel free to play those games, I played Tampa yesterday even though it wasn't on here. ATL is a tough one because they are facing a World Series MVP and a 2x Cy Young winner in back-to-back games, but at least you'll be getting great value which is few and far between with this system.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 105
Posted: #1013
Irage and b2w are you chasing like reg or doing the labby lines like mentioned last night? I'm not sure what I am going to do but want to be consistent
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 90
Posted: #1014
irage, mind pm'ing me or explaining how you get the spreadsheets and macros working on the mac. thanks brother
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1015
Straight chase for me, I'm on the Mets and taking Wasington too.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1016
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

Straight chase for me, I'm on the Mets and taking Wasington too.

Passing up on SF bro?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1017
Quote Originally Posted by BookieCrusher88:


Passing up on SF bro?


Depends on the result of the other games. If they pan out, I will take San Fran. Miami sucks.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 578
Posted: #1018
Washington just got swept by the Dodgers/ Lost their last 4.. they haven't had much run production in the past few days.. correct me if i'm wrong. They ARE playing at home though so they will potentially turn it around. BOL to whoever picked them! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1019
Quote Originally Posted by irage:



Depends on the result of the other games. If they pan out, I will take San Fran. Miami sucks.

I'm hoping the board gets cleared for us all
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1020
Quote Originally Posted by BigBautista91:

Washington just got swept by the Dodgers/ Lost their last 4.. they haven't had much run production in the past few days.. correct me if i'm wrong. They ARE playing at home though so they will potentially turn it around. BOL to whoever picked them! 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 43
Posted: #1021
new plan... bet against the mets
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #1022
Didnt someone say NYM guna hurt us this year??? LOL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1023
Mets "C" is a no play for me tomorrow. They keep on getting annihilated regardless of who's on the mound.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1024
Quote Originally Posted by bettor2win:

Didnt someone say NYM guna hurt us this year??? LOL

Why are they even on top? Lol  Of course I meant "if" there will be a "C" game, its a no play for me
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1025
Light'em up because I am going down, in BIG flames tonight.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.