All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB RPI SYSTEM 2012

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 405880
Posts: 2966
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #1601
Quote Originally Posted by CanisMajor:

I think this is up to the end user (bettor).

Personally, when tracking a 'systems' performance, I think all plays that meet the system parameters (RPI and filter criteria) are in play and count towards the final performance.

A 'system' should be automatic so that any monkey can press a button to use it.  When you start handicapping your system, it is really no longer a system that anyone can use because everyone will handicap differently and thus have different results.

IOW, it's my thinking that all four plays today should count towards the performance statistics of the system.  Whether or not you personally play all four is up to you.

 

Good points. I think for the Dodgers I'll still play it but maybe 1/2 unit instead of full. I did the same for the White Sox the other day.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #1602
Quote Originally Posted by LSU2thBone:

BTW,

Some food for thought. Since we are playing the GOOD team as a four game series against two lessor teams in two two-game series back-to-back...would it not also make sense to play against the BAD team as a four game series against two better teams in two two-game series?

Such as: VS San Diego against WAS & LAD and also VS Kansas City against TEX & BAL

Both SD and KC qualify as inferior in RPI to both of their upcoming opponents. MIN would also qualify to play against  as well, EXCEPT DET does not have a better than .500 record. (Unofficial I guess).

My guess is that there has not been back-testing on this? It follows the same logic - that bad teams will lose at least one against two good teams.

However it is a slightly different dynamic invloved - going against a bad team to lose one against two DIFFERENT good teams instead of backing a good team to win one against two different bad teams.

This would add a VS KC (Tex again) as it's own separate series and a VS SD (WAS) as it's own series to this group. If you wanted to add an unofficial VS MIN (DET) series you could as well.

I understand this is not your system, but it is right in line with the exact same logic

Talk to me Goose!

Good call Smart! So the plays would then be: AGAINST: sd, kc and min (unofficial but let's face it, min is terrible).

As far as considering injuries, as with Kemp....That's a great question. It is one of my filters as a no play/possible no play until we see how the team does without him (since Kemp is the leader of the LAD). Either way, CANIS is right, whether or not Kemp is hurt, it's still an official play. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 187
Posted: #1603
Quote Originally Posted by bettor2win:

Somebody said we had like 16 sweeps last year.  IDK. It would work a lot of the time, but definitely not all the time.  At least you would normally have + juice.



Ok thanks for clearing that one up. Not a good idea from me then.. :)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 33
Posted: #1604
Can anyone help me out with this?  The spreadsheet (both versions) are showing four games today though there are only two official plays today.  What am I missing?  Thanks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 33
Posted: #1605
Nevermind, figured it out. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 5372
Posted: #1606
Will any players be missing form rangers tomorrow? Need the full team lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 381
Posted: #1607
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 108
Posted: #1608
tex -250 tomorrow 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1309
Posted: #1609
Why did Texas have to lose our A game Juice is so so so high tomorrow
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #1610
I fucking knew it in the 3rd inning they were gonna lose. KC was putting people on base every inning. I took them in the first 5 and all they had to do was close up the top of the 5th and I would have won.

I want to back test how many RPI picks scored first.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #1611

[Quote:irage

I want to back test how many RPI picks scored first.
[/Quote]

Good idea. Let us know th results.

Tex looked lethargic tonight. If you watched StL, they did too. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 79
Posted: #1612
i hope everyone took advice on mn. hasnt lost a game3 yet. either way
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 204
Posted: #1613
I might parlay Texas with something tmr to lighten up the juice
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 5372
Posted: #1614
i'm laying a lot on the line tomorrow for texas ML, if they lose (please let me win betting gods LOL) i will take a break for a while, i'll be back though.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #1615
Heavy juice Tuesday! Man!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 204
Posted: #1616
Anyone taking runline?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 5372
Posted: #1617
Quote Originally Posted by TheMoneyTeam:

Anyone taking runline?


I almost did but that's not the system and i'll be so mad if rangers win by 1 or some BS. 

ML or nothing for me.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 37
Posted: #1618
So today playes are:
TEX B (juice juice juice!)
LAD A

am I right?

Regards
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 187
Posted: #1619
I've gone in with TEX at 1.40 odds...

I'm playing the system...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #1620
Plays Today are:
TEX B GAME with a horrendous amt of juice
LAD A GAME
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 63
Posted: #1621
Quote Originally Posted by TheGovernor11:

Can anyone help me out with this?  The spreadsheet (both versions) are showing four games today though there are only two official plays today.  What am I missing?  Thanks.

Can someone point me to the spreadsheet?

Thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 185
Posted: #1622
Quote Originally Posted by jbrent95:

Can someone point me to the spreadsheet?Thanks

See post #52 here for my version.

I will be posting a new version sometime this week with a new feature that I think people will like.

Search a few pages back in this thread and there is a link to Degen Gamblers version.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 14473
Posted: #1623
 RPI is working just FINE, THX Guys
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #1624

I just put my bet in for TEX.......now I just have to sweat it out for 12 hours.......

I have to admit - i'm really nervous

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 678
Posted: #1625

Plays Today are:
TEX B GAME with a horrendous amt of juice
LAD A GAME

B2W, How is LAD a play today? They won last night.

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.