hello all. beingnew to the forumI have traveledeverypostandI do not understandonwhatbasissports_Networkfilefor theseDogEFF/SDR'system'plays IsUnderdogSystemsV12oranother file AndifUnderdogSystemsV12how he findstheseselections. Could someone tellmewhataretheseselectionstoday. in any caseonthis foruma lot ofinterestingpost.
Sorryfor my englishI'mfrench
0
hello all. beingnew to the forumI have traveledeverypostandI do not understandonwhatbasissports_Networkfilefor theseDogEFF/SDR'system'plays IsUnderdogSystemsV12oranother file AndifUnderdogSystemsV12how he findstheseselections. Could someone tellmewhataretheseselectionstoday. in any caseonthis foruma lot ofinterestingpost.
[Quote: Originally Posted by literato]hello all. beingnew to the forumI have traveledeverypostandI do not understandonwhatbasissports_Networkfilefor theseDogEFF/SDR'system'plays IsUnderdogSystemsV12oranother file AndifUnderdogSystemsV12how he findstheseselections. Could someone tellmewhataretheseselectionstoday. in any caseonthis foruma lot ofinterestingpost.
[/Quote] Yes, these are todays (Sheet) selections DogEFF/RRL
BAL [-1.5] +195 RRL
BOS [-1.5] +205 RRL
MIN [-1.5] +198 RRL
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by literato]hello all. beingnew to the forumI have traveledeverypostandI do not understandonwhatbasissports_Networkfilefor theseDogEFF/SDR'system'plays IsUnderdogSystemsV12oranother file AndifUnderdogSystemsV12how he findstheseselections. Could someone tellmewhataretheseselectionstoday. in any caseonthis foruma lot ofinterestingpost.
[/Quote] Yes, these are todays (Sheet) selections DogEFF/RRL
How are you arriving at these selections for the RRL plays?
If I'm not mistaken the sheet does not produce RRL winners, the sheet determines an edge and then the games are handicapped to produce the RRL selections.
If I'm mistaken please correct me
Great work here guys
0
Erbatiz / s_N
How are you arriving at these selections for the RRL plays?
If I'm not mistaken the sheet does not produce RRL winners, the sheet determines an edge and then the games are handicapped to produce the RRL selections.
bal--as a dog eff .625 ..>=2(RRL) .765 DOG WIN EFF SCORE +24
tor-- FAV WIN EFF SCORE -24
this is on the sheet you can check it everyday,, so you can see how baltimore is much better as a dog than toronto as a fav in scoring runs,, hope i could help you..so you take all the dogs of everyday in the system and compare each versus the favs ,,sorry my english is not very good ,,thats my way dont know is S_N is doing this way.
0
ok,,im going to try to explain my way...
bal--as a dog eff .625 ..>=2(RRL) .765 DOG WIN EFF SCORE +24
tor-- FAV WIN EFF SCORE -24
this is on the sheet you can check it everyday,, so you can see how baltimore is much better as a dog than toronto as a fav in scoring runs,, hope i could help you..so you take all the dogs of everyday in the system and compare each versus the favs ,,sorry my english is not very good ,,thats my way dont know is S_N is doing this way.
I look at the selections of Dan and after that i go to oddsportal and look up the matches who are missing. For those 4 matches there were no underdog selections, so i take the favs in them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RommiRommi:
Min a DOG EFF. Clevleland not a fav pick?
I look at the selections of Dan and after that i go to oddsportal and look up the matches who are missing. For those 4 matches there were no underdog selections, so i take the favs in them.
I look at the selections of Dan and after that i go to oddsportal and look up the matches who are missing. For those 4 matches there were no underdog selections, so i take the favs in them.
Yes but Minn was a dog play so Clev should not have been a fave play under your system.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by orhane:
I look at the selections of Dan and after that i go to oddsportal and look up the matches who are missing. For those 4 matches there were no underdog selections, so i take the favs in them.
Yes but Minn was a dog play so Clev should not have been a fave play under your system.
Sports network i know you posted the plays for today here..I've been trying to find you.. where will u be posting for the rest of the season?
the plays posted are exlusive to this thread, and this thread only, (for the rest of the season) based on tracking data connected to the DogEFF/RRL Sheet, and the consistency that is attached...appreciate your interest
0
Quote Originally Posted by Soujah24:
Sports network i know you posted the plays for today here..I've been trying to find you.. where will u be posting for the rest of the season?
the plays posted are exlusive to this thread, and this thread only, (for the rest of the season) based on tracking data connected to the DogEFF/RRL Sheet, and the consistency that is attached...appreciate your interest
bal--as a dog eff .625 ..>=2(RRL) .765 DOG WIN EFF SCORE +24
tor-- FAV WIN EFF SCORE -24
this is on the sheet you can check it everyday,, so you can see how baltimore is much better as a dog than toronto as a fav in scoring runs,, hope i could help you..so you take all the dogs of everyday in the system and compare each versus the favs ,,sorry my english is not very good ,,thats my way dont know is S_N is doing this way.
your english may be a little 'dry' but your explanation is conlusive to the realities of handicapping MLB, good work!..The Sheet is without doubt is "consistent" and speaks for itself from post #2 onward to post #666 (present) their has been no regression; every capper has a different approach to consistency; and the advantages it possesses, if you have no 'form' or simply do not comprehend how to handicap a MLB game, then their is no advantage to the Sheet's use, plain and simple (the emphisis is on the 'handicap') take note; the Sheet is a calculated "tool" not a crystal ball-
0
Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:
ok,,im going to try to explain my way...
bal--as a dog eff .625 ..>=2(RRL) .765 DOG WIN EFF SCORE +24
tor-- FAV WIN EFF SCORE -24
this is on the sheet you can check it everyday,, so you can see how baltimore is much better as a dog than toronto as a fav in scoring runs,, hope i could help you..so you take all the dogs of everyday in the system and compare each versus the favs ,,sorry my english is not very good ,,thats my way dont know is S_N is doing this way.
your english may be a little 'dry' but your explanation is conlusive to the realities of handicapping MLB, good work!..The Sheet is without doubt is "consistent" and speaks for itself from post #2 onward to post #666 (present) their has been no regression; every capper has a different approach to consistency; and the advantages it possesses, if you have no 'form' or simply do not comprehend how to handicap a MLB game, then their is no advantage to the Sheet's use, plain and simple (the emphisis is on the 'handicap') take note; the Sheet is a calculated "tool" not a crystal ball-
How are you arriving at these selections for the RRL plays?
"If I'm not mistaken the sheet does not produce RRL winners", the sheet determines an edge and then the games are handicapped to produce the RRL selections.
If I'm mistaken please correct me
Great work here guys
Yesterday's 'Sheet' produced RRL WINNERS: (results)
<PIT [-1.5] +225 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.5u
<CHW [-1.5] +202 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.04u
<NYM [-1.5] +275 RRL> RISK 2u LOSS 2u / ML WIN 3.36u
<MIL [-1.5] +205 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.1u
<ARI [-1.5] +185 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 3.7u
<SD [-1.5] +218 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.36u
<MIA [-1.5] +210 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.2u
BOS [-1.5] +203 RRL RISK 2u WIN 4.06u
oil, your mistaken, stand corrected, as yesterdays Sheet Produced results (DogEFF/RRL 'system' plays) clearly indicates.
however, your assessment is correct; to get to the RRL a capper must go through the dog, and this requires handicapping (as you have stated, good call) technique/form, and the knowledge to cut, and filter..my best to you always
0
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
Erbatiz / s_N
How are you arriving at these selections for the RRL plays?
"If I'm not mistaken the sheet does not produce RRL winners", the sheet determines an edge and then the games are handicapped to produce the RRL selections.
If I'm mistaken please correct me
Great work here guys
Yesterday's 'Sheet' produced RRL WINNERS: (results)
<PIT [-1.5] +225 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.5u
<CHW [-1.5] +202 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.04u
<NYM [-1.5] +275 RRL> RISK 2u LOSS 2u / ML WIN 3.36u
<MIL [-1.5] +205 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.1u
<ARI [-1.5] +185 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 3.7u
<SD [-1.5] +218 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.36u
<MIA [-1.5] +210 RRL> RISK 2u WIN 4.2u
BOS [-1.5] +203 RRL RISK 2u WIN 4.06u
oil, your mistaken, stand corrected, as yesterdays Sheet Produced results (DogEFF/RRL 'system' plays) clearly indicates.
however, your assessment is correct; to get to the RRL a capper must go through the dog, and this requires handicapping (as you have stated, good call) technique/form, and the knowledge to cut, and filter..my best to you always
Saturday 6/22 results: Note, I messed up when posting and missed the ChiSox play on the Sagarin system The pitcher ranking difference was 25 (Quintana vs Davis). Sorry for the oversight but I'm including it in the totals for system accuracy.
Sagarin plays
2-0, +4.42 units
YTD 10-8, +7.14 units
All 2 Units
Colo 106 WIN
ChiSox 115 WIN
Dog EFF Score
1-1, +.1 units
YTD 50-51, +11.14 units
Bos 159 Loss
Pitt 110 WIN
Dog EFF
3-1, +5.18 units
YTD 77-75, +24.30 units
All 2 units
Tor 106 WIN
Minn 135 Loss
Pitt 110 WIN
Mil 143 WIN
System Plays
6-4, +2.88 units
YTD 240-278 +23.07 units
Tor 106 WIN
Minn 135 Loss
Pitt 110 WIN
Mil 143 WIN
TB 137 Loss
ChiSox 115 WIN
Sea 114 WIN
Mia 131 Loss
Mets 103 Loss
LAD 100 WIN
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Saturday 6/22 results: Note, I messed up when posting and missed the ChiSox play on the Sagarin system The pitcher ranking difference was 25 (Quintana vs Davis). Sorry for the oversight but I'm including it in the totals for system accuracy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.