Just to review, this system is to play against any team going on a 3+ game road trip?
Thanks in advance.
Kevnb
Yes Kev, but remember, you must play the +PL if they are dogs. The point of this system is the age old theory that when teams start a road trip they alway come out guns blazing on there first couple of games. even if they lose, its usually only by one, especially if they are dogs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kevnbs:
Just to review, this system is to play against any team going on a 3+ game road trip?
Thanks in advance.
Kevnb
Yes Kev, but remember, you must play the +PL if they are dogs. The point of this system is the age old theory that when teams start a road trip they alway come out guns blazing on there first couple of games. even if they lose, its usually only by one, especially if they are dogs.
Yes Kev, but remember, you must play the +PL if they are dogs. The point of this system is the age old theory that when teams start a road trip they alway come out guns blazing on there first couple of games. even if they lose, its usually only by one, especially if they are dogs.
So it's just a road trip and nothing to do with all of the games being out of conference?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
Yes Kev, but remember, you must play the +PL if they are dogs. The point of this system is the age old theory that when teams start a road trip they alway come out guns blazing on there first couple of games. even if they lose, its usually only by one, especially if they are dogs.
So it's just a road trip and nothing to do with all of the games being out of conference?
So it's just a road trip and nothing to do with all of the games being out of conference?
Exactly Lipps. I have 4 years of backtesting proving very strong results if you play the +PL on dogs too. Very high "A" game percentage, and the "B" game percentage is sick!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
So it's just a road trip and nothing to do with all of the games being out of conference?
Exactly Lipps. I have 4 years of backtesting proving very strong results if you play the +PL on dogs too. Very high "A" game percentage, and the "B" game percentage is sick!!
Exactly Lipps. I have 4 years of backtesting proving very strong results if you play the +PL on dogs too. Very high "A" game percentage, and the "B" game percentage is sick!!
And no filtering out of crap teams ? Say ones that are in the bottom 10 of win percentage or bottom 10 of road win percentage ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
Exactly Lipps. I have 4 years of backtesting proving very strong results if you play the +PL on dogs too. Very high "A" game percentage, and the "B" game percentage is sick!!
And no filtering out of crap teams ? Say ones that are in the bottom 10 of win percentage or bottom 10 of road win percentage ?
So let me get this correct and hopefully kill 2 birds with 1 stone for me and Lipps............
They system is played with ALL teams and when any 1 team begins on the road with a 3 game series {Only} You are to play them if they are favored on the Money line and if they are dogs + the puck line, Also you only wager on the 1st 2 games of their road trip ??????
Would that be the correct way ????
Thank you ....................BK
0
Kong..............
So let me get this correct and hopefully kill 2 birds with 1 stone for me and Lipps............
They system is played with ALL teams and when any 1 team begins on the road with a 3 game series {Only} You are to play them if they are favored on the Money line and if they are dogs + the puck line, Also you only wager on the 1st 2 games of their road trip ??????
Hey Kong, isnt the system better wit betting on c games cuase on the other thread u said that the record wit c bets is 163 wins wit 3 loses... so using labouchere wit that would make u tons of money wouldnt it?
also u said wit this new system u had 17 loses so even wit this being wit 2 games instead of 3, isnt the old system better?
- jus wondering cause im still lil confused wit this new modified system
0
Hey Kong, isnt the system better wit betting on c games cuase on the other thread u said that the record wit c bets is 163 wins wit 3 loses... so using labouchere wit that would make u tons of money wouldnt it?
also u said wit this new system u had 17 loses so even wit this being wit 2 games instead of 3, isnt the old system better?
- jus wondering cause im still lil confused wit this new modified system
So let me get this correct and hopefully kill 2 birds with 1 stone for me and Lipps............
They system is played with ALL teams and when any 1 team begins on the road with a 3 game series {Only} You are to play them if they are favored on the Money line and if they are dogs + the puck line, Also you only wager on the 1st 2 games of their road trip ??????
Would that be the correct way ????
Thank you ....................BK
All teams guys. I am still working on filters, but the problem is that most of the really bad road teams were all "A" winner throughout the past 4 years. It was the good teams like Carolina and Detroit where the losses came in. Although Tampa had 3 or 4 losses one year, which would be catastrophic. But that is why I am only going to Play A or B games and labouchere it. If one team doesn't win either game, I just increase my bet on the next series until the line is cleared. When dealing with a 90% win rate, hopefully it will go smoothly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigkeith:
Kong..............
So let me get this correct and hopefully kill 2 birds with 1 stone for me and Lipps............
They system is played with ALL teams and when any 1 team begins on the road with a 3 game series {Only} You are to play them if they are favored on the Money line and if they are dogs + the puck line, Also you only wager on the 1st 2 games of their road trip ??????
Would that be the correct way ????
Thank you ....................BK
All teams guys. I am still working on filters, but the problem is that most of the really bad road teams were all "A" winner throughout the past 4 years. It was the good teams like Carolina and Detroit where the losses came in. Although Tampa had 3 or 4 losses one year, which would be catastrophic. But that is why I am only going to Play A or B games and labouchere it. If one team doesn't win either game, I just increase my bet on the next series until the line is cleared. When dealing with a 90% win rate, hopefully it will go smoothly.
Hey Kong, isnt the system better wit betting on c games cuase on the other thread u said that the record wit c bets is 163 wins wit 3 loses... so using labouchere wit that would make u tons of money wouldnt it?
also u said wit this new system u had 17 loses so even wit this being wit 2 games instead of 3, isnt the old system better?
- jus wondering cause im still lil confused wit this new modified system
The reason why I switched my thinking to just A and B games is the fact that from last year had a great record, but the previous 3 were not that good. Before last season we averaged 8 losses per season. My goal is to take the high% plays which are always the A or B games and use the modified labouchere to money manage. As long as you bet proportional to you bankrol, you will always be ok and profit. I recomend your starting unit be 1.5%-2% of your bankroll.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamblrzAnonyms:
Hey Kong, isnt the system better wit betting on c games cuase on the other thread u said that the record wit c bets is 163 wins wit 3 loses... so using labouchere wit that would make u tons of money wouldnt it?
also u said wit this new system u had 17 loses so even wit this being wit 2 games instead of 3, isnt the old system better?
- jus wondering cause im still lil confused wit this new modified system
The reason why I switched my thinking to just A and B games is the fact that from last year had a great record, but the previous 3 were not that good. Before last season we averaged 8 losses per season. My goal is to take the high% plays which are always the A or B games and use the modified labouchere to money manage. As long as you bet proportional to you bankrol, you will always be ok and profit. I recomend your starting unit be 1.5%-2% of your bankroll.
Another thing guys, I am still working on filters, and no RPI. Until daily RPI stats are available, the are useless. If I can get the 90% to 95%, by trimming fat, I will sure do it.
0
Another thing guys, I am still working on filters, and no RPI. Until daily RPI stats are available, the are useless. If I can get the 90% to 95%, by trimming fat, I will sure do it.
Another thing guys, I am still working on filters, and no RPI. Until daily RPI stats are available, the are useless. If I can get the 90% to 95%, by trimming fat, I will sure do it.
I been working on something similar, very time consuming I have only done 3 seasons so far. Going back and doing each season manually for both filtered and non-filtered takes me about 6-8 hours per season.
Good news: The winning % on a 3 game chase is very good, showing one loss for each of the past couple of years.
Bad news: Your number of plays from non-filtered to filtered is cut to about 1/3 of the scheduled series. Approx 60-65 plays a year from the original 150/160+. The high juices can also be an issue, however if you have solid MM this should be of little concern to you. Like a friend once said... "Theres no juice when you win"...
GMSI
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
Another thing guys, I am still working on filters, and no RPI. Until daily RPI stats are available, the are useless. If I can get the 90% to 95%, by trimming fat, I will sure do it.
I been working on something similar, very time consuming I have only done 3 seasons so far. Going back and doing each season manually for both filtered and non-filtered takes me about 6-8 hours per season.
Good news: The winning % on a 3 game chase is very good, showing one loss for each of the past couple of years.
Bad news: Your number of plays from non-filtered to filtered is cut to about 1/3 of the scheduled series. Approx 60-65 plays a year from the original 150/160+. The high juices can also be an issue, however if you have solid MM this should be of little concern to you. Like a friend once said... "Theres no juice when you win"...
Side note: concidence or not, each of the losses in the last 2 years both came in October on the teams 2nd road trip and backup goalies started games in both series.
Not trying to justify, only an observation when looking back. Im sure some wins came with backup goalies in nets as well.
GMSI
0
Side note: concidence or not, each of the losses in the last 2 years both came in October on the teams 2nd road trip and backup goalies started games in both series.
Not trying to justify, only an observation when looking back. Im sure some wins came with backup goalies in nets as well.
Nice work on this, will you be posting your plays during the NHL season?
Hey Patrick,
I am going to try man. It just depends on how much time I have. Football season is my busiest time of the year, but I am very interested in putting this system in place. And until you test it publicly, you don't really have shit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PatrickBateman:
Kong,
Nice work on this, will you be posting your plays during the NHL season?
Hey Patrick,
I am going to try man. It just depends on how much time I have. Football season is my busiest time of the year, but I am very interested in putting this system in place. And until you test it publicly, you don't really have shit.
How would you do on this system wagering it Martingale style ???
I AM thinking with just A and B wagers why would it not work ???
Thanks
BK
Hmmn. It probably would not work that good man. Lets use 2008-2009 season as an example. By just playing A and B games you would have 149 wins. That would leave you with 17 losses. Now 149 and 17 is not bad, but remember we are playing with high juice here, so 1 loss could mean up to 5 units. And also last season was an excellent season for this. The prior 3 had even more losses. Stick with the modified labouchere and bankroll mangement and you will easily bank 100 units over the season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigkeith:
Kong
How would you do on this system wagering it Martingale style ???
I AM thinking with just A and B wagers why would it not work ???
Thanks
BK
Hmmn. It probably would not work that good man. Lets use 2008-2009 season as an example. By just playing A and B games you would have 149 wins. That would leave you with 17 losses. Now 149 and 17 is not bad, but remember we are playing with high juice here, so 1 loss could mean up to 5 units. And also last season was an excellent season for this. The prior 3 had even more losses. Stick with the modified labouchere and bankroll mangement and you will easily bank 100 units over the season.
When you say the middle Labby system are you refering to the Latest 2008 research system in that link on page 1 of this thread ??? I just want to confirm which labby you are using.
Thanks
BK
0
Kong.......
When you say the middle Labby system are you refering to the Latest 2008 research system in that link on page 1 of this thread ??? I just want to confirm which labby you are using.
Hey kong thanks for answering, yea 8 loses would ruin ur bankroll if u were betting on a 3 game series... hope u hav time to post ur plays... also u wouldnt hav a nfl system would u?
0
Hey kong thanks for answering, yea 8 loses would ruin ur bankroll if u were betting on a 3 game series... hope u hav time to post ur plays... also u wouldnt hav a nfl system would u?
When you say the middle Labby system are you refering to the Latest 2008 research system in that link on page 1 of this thread ??? I just want to confirm which labby you are using.
Thanks
BK
Hey Big Keith, I think PSIC and decided on using the 2nd on from the bottom. It's aggresive, but not too aggressive.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigkeith:
Kong.......
When you say the middle Labby system are you refering to the Latest 2008 research system in that link on page 1 of this thread ??? I just want to confirm which labby you are using.
Thanks
BK
Hey Big Keith, I think PSIC and decided on using the 2nd on from the bottom. It's aggresive, but not too aggressive.
Hey kong thanks for answering, yea 8 loses would ruin ur bankroll if u were betting on a 3 game series... hope u hav time to post ur plays... also u wouldnt hav a nfl system would u?
Man that New JM NFL system will be surfacing on a thread today or tommorow. Let's look into that, it should be fun!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamblrzAnonyms:
Hey kong thanks for answering, yea 8 loses would ruin ur bankroll if u were betting on a 3 game series... hope u hav time to post ur plays... also u wouldnt hav a nfl system would u?
Man that New JM NFL system will be surfacing on a thread today or tommorow. Let's look into that, it should be fun!
Hmmn. It probably would not work that good man. Lets use 2008-2009 season as an example. By just playing A and B games you would have 149 wins. That would leave you with 17 losses. Now 149 and 17 is not bad, but remember we are playing with high juice here, so 1 loss could mean up to 5 units. And also last season was an excellent season for this. The prior 3 had even more losses. Stick with the modified labouchere and bankroll mangement and you will easily bank 100 units over the season.
damn that sounds better every time you say it Kong...
cant wait for october and to get started....i think the key is exactly what you say...start small and not get too greedy out of the gate...
0
Quote Originally Posted by KongKiller:
Hmmn. It probably would not work that good man. Lets use 2008-2009 season as an example. By just playing A and B games you would have 149 wins. That would leave you with 17 losses. Now 149 and 17 is not bad, but remember we are playing with high juice here, so 1 loss could mean up to 5 units. And also last season was an excellent season for this. The prior 3 had even more losses. Stick with the modified labouchere and bankroll mangement and you will easily bank 100 units over the season.
damn that sounds better every time you say it Kong...
cant wait for october and to get started....i think the key is exactly what you say...start small and not get too greedy out of the gate...
My question is...when it comes to using the labouchere method, it is not easy to measure its success with units. If it was martingale, its easy as every chase will yield a unit profit when it hits.
With the modified labouchere, i can lose the A game, be down a unit. then hit the B game and profit only half a unit.
Also, if you choose to increase the numbers of each line after clearing X amount of lines, doesn't your unit size change as well?
So i guess my question is...if your line is 10-10-10-10, does it mean your unit size is 20? So according to past results, using labouchere will yield $2000.00 using 10-10-10-10 lines?
i would also look into using the modified labouchere system for top home teams on home stands as well.
keep up the good work!
0
sounds and looks good kong!
My question is...when it comes to using the labouchere method, it is not easy to measure its success with units. If it was martingale, its easy as every chase will yield a unit profit when it hits.
With the modified labouchere, i can lose the A game, be down a unit. then hit the B game and profit only half a unit.
Also, if you choose to increase the numbers of each line after clearing X amount of lines, doesn't your unit size change as well?
So i guess my question is...if your line is 10-10-10-10, does it mean your unit size is 20? So according to past results, using labouchere will yield $2000.00 using 10-10-10-10 lines?
i would also look into using the modified labouchere system for top home teams on home stands as well.
Looking forward to this season starting, and starting my first ever full season of sports investing. Can anyone recommend the sportsbook for me to be using this strategy through?
Thanks,
0
Looking forward to this season starting, and starting my first ever full season of sports investing. Can anyone recommend the sportsbook for me to be using this strategy through?
Looking forward to this season starting, and starting my first ever full season of sports investing. Can anyone recommend the sportsbook for me to be using this strategy through?
Thanks,
bet jamacia , matchbook or the greek are all good books
0
Quote Originally Posted by superskid:
Looking forward to this season starting, and starting my first ever full season of sports investing. Can anyone recommend the sportsbook for me to be using this strategy through?
Thanks,
bet jamacia , matchbook or the greek are all good books
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
