I remember I backtested system #1. It's not very good. System #2 is sick though.
That's GREAT to hear now!!! WTF?
That's GREAT to hear now!!! WTF?
That's GREAT to hear now!!! WTF?
Could you please explain BOTH of your views?
Could you please explain BOTH of your views?
--the past ATS losses have nothing to do with future ATS losses or wins, its still about 50-50
--this is similar to the martinglae system which is proven to have short term gains but long term can have big losses
--the only good thing I can think of this is similar to "REGRESSION TO THE MEAN"- your probably better off fading abyone who is above 80% ATS in the leaderboard for any sport (no moneylines)
--the ONLY SYSTEM I believe in is FADING THE PUBLIC as outlined in the articles in SPORTS INSIGHTS, as they are statistically significant
--anthing you showw has too small a sample size and anyone who does research knows that this could just be chance
there are a few reasons why I seriously doubt you will do well although I wish you luck and hope Im srong except for the REGRESSION TO THE MEAN idea which is a long held scientific principle
good luck!!
--the past ATS losses have nothing to do with future ATS losses or wins, its still about 50-50
--this is similar to the martinglae system which is proven to have short term gains but long term can have big losses
--the only good thing I can think of this is similar to "REGRESSION TO THE MEAN"- your probably better off fading abyone who is above 80% ATS in the leaderboard for any sport (no moneylines)
--the ONLY SYSTEM I believe in is FADING THE PUBLIC as outlined in the articles in SPORTS INSIGHTS, as they are statistically significant
--anthing you showw has too small a sample size and anyone who does research knows that this could just be chance
there are a few reasons why I seriously doubt you will do well although I wish you luck and hope Im srong except for the REGRESSION TO THE MEAN idea which is a long held scientific principle
good luck!!
--the past ATS losses have nothing to do with future ATS losses or wins, its still about 50-50
--this is similar to the martinglae system which is proven to have short term gains but long term can have big losses
--the only good thing I can think of this is similar to "REGRESSION TO THE MEAN"- your probably better off fading abyone who is above 80% ATS in the leaderboard for any sport (no moneylines)
--the ONLY SYSTEM I believe in is FADING THE PUBLIC as outlined in the articles in SPORTS INSIGHTS, as they are statistically significant
--anthing you showw has too small a sample size and anyone who does research knows that this could just be chance
there are a few reasons why I seriously doubt you will do well although I wish you luck and hope Im srong except for the REGRESSION TO THE MEAN idea which is a long held scientific principle
good luck!!
--the past ATS losses have nothing to do with future ATS losses or wins, its still about 50-50
--this is similar to the martinglae system which is proven to have short term gains but long term can have big losses
--the only good thing I can think of this is similar to "REGRESSION TO THE MEAN"- your probably better off fading abyone who is above 80% ATS in the leaderboard for any sport (no moneylines)
--the ONLY SYSTEM I believe in is FADING THE PUBLIC as outlined in the articles in SPORTS INSIGHTS, as they are statistically significant
--anthing you showw has too small a sample size and anyone who does research knows that this could just be chance
there are a few reasons why I seriously doubt you will do well although I wish you luck and hope Im srong except for the REGRESSION TO THE MEAN idea which is a long held scientific principle
good luck!!
Mem to win ats vs OKC
Streakers
Bos won 5 ats in a row
CLE lost 6 ats in a row
Lal lost 6 ats in a row
I am still confused on System #6. Do we wait for the X game or do we bet on CLE and LAL to win tonite?
Mem to win ats vs OKC
Streakers
Bos won 5 ats in a row
CLE lost 6 ats in a row
Lal lost 6 ats in a row
I am still confused on System #6. Do we wait for the X game or do we bet on CLE and LAL to win tonite?
Ok, CLE Irving (shoulder) is expected to play Tuesday against San Antonio
LAL Bynum (ankle) said he will not play against New Jersey on Tuesday
Ok, CLE Irving (shoulder) is expected to play Tuesday against San Antonio
LAL Bynum (ankle) said he will not play against New Jersey on Tuesday
It used to be 6 Ls in a row, so why not make a 1/2 unit bet tonite? If u lose, then u start with a 1U bet next game. If u win, then it's great, cause u didn't miss anything!
It used to be 6 Ls in a row, so why not make a 1/2 unit bet tonite? If u lose, then u start with a 1U bet next game. If u win, then it's great, cause u didn't miss anything!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.