All Forums | Systems & Strategies

NBA teams with win percent below 425 fade

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11211
Posts: 134
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #51

SYSTEM PLAYS  1/25/12

OKC -12.5

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #52

New Orleans  - 12.5   -  3 units  

                           SYSTEM RESULTS  

                           A  7-2

                           B 1-1      + 4 UNITS

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2554
Posted: #53

what is the record if we fade N.O. into a 3rd game?

that would be 5 in a row for the ATS.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 909
Posted: #54
Just a thought for accuracy - Shouldnt we count loses as -3.4 units (-110 + -231=~340)
Fading New Orleans yields -3.4 units. Winning 8 units so far makes the system +4.6 total.

BTW are we going to restart fading New Orleans? Did you do that last year Knox? If you did not & I am reading post #5 correctly, your system would have been +8 more units!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 909
Posted: #55
After rereading post #5 I am confused. The A bet for this system is game #3, B bet is game #4. Knox, you mention that 8 teams went & won 4 or 5 games in a row ATS. The record for the B bet would then be 4-4 and the record for the C bet would be 4-0. I dont even see a reason why we should play the B bet if that is the case.
Record would be
A bet 33 out of 41
B bet 4 out of 8
C bet 4 out of 4
Did you mean to say that there were 8 loses for the system last year - meaning 8 teams went and won 5 or 6 games in a row ATS last season?
Record for A+B bets (games 3/4) would be 54-8 +27 Units
Record for C+D bets (games 5/6) would be 8-0  +8 Units.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 909
Posted: #56
I can't edit. so.....
Record would be
A bet 37 out of 45  +27.2 units
B bet 4 out of 8   -1.2 units
C bet 4 out of 4  +4 units
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 818
Posted: #57
I think that is right Air. What I got from the system is that only 8 times last year did a losing team (less than .425 win %) win 6 games in a row against the spread. I will be fading NWO on Friday.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #58

Yes guys you can fade till the end of time .. But I bet a 2 game chase . I dont like putting  6 times my normal bet to win one .. If you follow it they way it started . chase games 3 and 4 you will be up units without having the extra risk of a 4 or 5 game chase .. Sometimes what I do is take those teams that are on game 4 or 5 and throw a small parlay play .. I dont do that often .. I keep it simple 2 wins ATS fade for 2 games .. I will make up those 3 units lost by  by the end of next week ... If not earlier   

No plays tonight

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #59

Quote Originally Posted by Air1:

Just a thought for accuracy - Shouldnt we count loses as -3.4 units (-110 + -231=~340)
Fading New Orleans yields -3.4 units. Winning 8 units so far makes the system +4.6 total.

BTW are we going to restart fading New Orleans? Did you do that last year Knox? If you did not & I am reading post #5 correctly, your system would have been +8 more units!!

You know you brought up a great point you CAN start a nother 2 game chase from game 4 and 5 .. i might do that as well .. If I lost 3 units .. and then start another 2 game chase I can still make one unit back on that team ... I am going to start doing that ...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #60

Quote Originally Posted by Air1:

After rereading post #5 I am confused. The A bet for this system is game #3, B bet is game #4. Knox, you mention that 8 teams went & won 4 or 5 games in a row ATS. The record for the B bet would then be 4-4 and the record for the C bet would be 4-0. I dont even see a reason why we should play the B bet if that is the case.
Record would be
A bet 33 out of 41
B bet 4 out of 8

 

Yes eight times the system had losses last yr ..
C bet 4 out of 4
Did you mean to say that there were 8 loses for the system last year - meaning 8 teams went and won 5 or 6 games in a row ATS last season?
Record for A+B bets (games 3/4) would be 54-8 +27 Units
Record for C+D bets (games 5/6) would be 8-0  +8 Units.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by Knoxpoker:

I backtested last yr . There were 8 streaks of 4 ats and 5 ats for teams below 425 win pct.

For the 2010 NBA season

Toronto had 4 wins ATS in a row

Milwaukee had one 4 win ATS in a row and a 5 streak ATS in a row

Detroit had one 5 Streak win  ATS

Charlotte had one 5 streak win  ATS

Minnesota had one 5 ATS win streak

Clippers had one 4 game ATS streak

Sacramento had one 4 game ATS streak

The rest were 2 and 3 game streaks ..

 

 

 

 

There were 4 loses last yr ..sorry i posted the wrong info ..

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #62
this system is made to win about 20 units each yr .. thats what  I shoot for .. If you want more plays and risk making more units .. You can play these teams 350 win percent and below right after they win a game ATS .. If you back track this you can make 20 units if not more  a season ...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 947
Posted: #63
For Friday. Jan 27th, there are technically 3 plays. 

Orlando going against New Orleans.

Denver against Toronto

The last one I am confused on.  Cleveland has a winning percentage of only .412 and have won two games in a row ATS.  They are facing New Jersey but Jersey's win percentage is only .316.  So do you still play a team that is as bad as NJ is?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #64
Yes take NJ +3  what I am going to do is just start a new 2 game chase on New Orleans ... and Fading Toronto ...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2554
Posted: #65

Teams under .425 (As of Jan 27)

           Teams         ATS          Current ATS Streak

  1. NY Knicks (ATS 4-14)      Lost 1
  2. NJ Nets     (ATS 9-10)      Won 1
  3. Toronto      (ATS 10-9)      Won 2 *****
  4. Milwaukee (ATS  7-10)     Won 1
  5. Cleveland   (ATS 10-7)      Won 2 *****
  6. Detroit       (ATS 6-13)      Won 1
  7. Washington(ATS 6-12)     Won 1
  8. Charlotte    (ATS 7-12)      Lost 3
  9. Phoenix     (ATS 7-10)      Lost 2
  10. G.S.          (ATS 8-9)        won 1
  11. Sacremento (ATS 6-13)    lost 3
  12. New Orleans (ATS 9-9)     Won 4*****

TODAYS GAME

TOR at DEN -11.5 (A)

NJ +3 at CLE (A)   

Knox...is there any filters when 2 teams under .425 play each other and one team qualifies i.e. NJ at CLE tonight?

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #66

There are no filters . Just grab both of them and play it ..

Tonights plays  

DENVER -11.5

NJ + 3

ORLANDO - 4

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2554
Posted: #67
Why Orlando...   we stopped chasing N.O.    ???
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 947
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:

Why Orlando...   we stopped chasing N.O.    ???


I think he said he stops the financial chase with a 3 unit loss but that doesn't mean he stops going against a certain team if the system calls for it.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #69

Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01:

Why Orlando...   we stopped chasing N.O.    ???

 

Its up to you how long pyou want to chase.. I started a new 2 game chase on New Orleans .. I am done with them  I lost 4 units on them and I will let them run their current streak ,,, Hopefully  Denver can get the cover to make us 2-1 on the night ,,,

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #70

Denver -12.5   SYSTEM RESULTS   + 5 UNITS  

NJ + 3                (A) 9-3

Orlando - 4          (B) 1-1 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 5372
Posted: #71
have you back tested any other seasons besides last year? looks like a decent system to pickup some units.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by Riceboi:

have you back tested any other seasons besides last year? looks like a decent system to pickup some units.

I have looked at alot of other systems . Most of them are 6  game chases. I dont see risking all of those units to win one ... I feel comfortable fading the shitiest teams in the NBA ,, If you noticed the the 4 loses  have been within no more than 3 points .. This will stand the test of time.. 3 months from now we will be talking about how we arre going to play it next yr ,, We will be up around 20 units or so....

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1244
Posted: #73

Oh shit ... sorry Riceboi  I thought your post said " have you backtested any other systems" 

Yes 2009-2010   would have won around 23 units...

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 909
Posted: #74
just did somewhat of a back test. I could only go by end of season winning % and did not start ats wins til the 10th game. I found::
2009-2010 - Wash + NJ won 6 in a row ATS, LAC + Min won 7 in a row ATS, Ind won 8 in a row ATS!!!
2008-2009 - Tor + Min won 6 in a row ATS, Mem + NY win 7 in a row ATS

Not going to back Test any further. Just seeing if last season is the norm. It is not. Expect about 3 occasions where these crappy teams will win about 6 games in a row ATS.

Restarting a chase after a lose seems like a good idea, but we should do a little more back testing to make sure its still a safe bet.
Last season this system went something like 44 wins and 8 loses if ONLY fading games 3 & 4 ATS.
If someone wants to start go ahead. I will try the 08-09 & 09-10 seasons during next week. Working over the weekend.

https://www.nba.com/standings/2008/team_record_comparison/conferenceNew_Std_Cnf.html
https://www.nba.com/standings/2009/team_record_comparison/conferenceNew_Std_Cnf.html
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2554
Posted: #75

Teams under .425 (As of Jan 28)

           Teams         ATS          Current ATS Streak

  1. NY Knicks (ATS 5-14)     Won 1
  2. NJ Nets     (ATS 10-10)   Won 2 ****
  3. Toronto      (ATS 10-10)   lost 1
  4. Milwaukee (ATS  8-10)    Won 2****
  5. Cleveland   (ATS 10-8)     lost 1
  6. Detroit       (ATS 6-13-1)  Won 1 and pushed
  7. Washington(ATS 6-13)     lost 1
  8. Charlotte    (ATS 7-13)     Lost 4
  9. Phoenix     (ATS 7-11)     Lost 3
  10. G.S.          (ATS 8-10)     lost1
  11. Sacremento (ATS 6-13)   lost 3
  12. New Orleans (ATS 10-9)  Won 5

TODAYS GAMES

LA Lakers -5 at Milwaukee

***What about the Pistons?    they won a game and pushed last night, would you consider that a win?   I would fade Detroit every game if it were up to me???

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.