LOL you got that right ... As they say from my parts ."You are eating the dick" . Thats another way of saying -losing streak.. I will push thru it ..
I am looking for 20 units .no more no less.. I wish I had a system that made 60 units a year .. but I dont ...
If you want to follow thats great ..I assure you i am looking to make 20 units .. It might be a grind along the way , I am ready fo the ride ..... good luck
Tonights plays results - 2 units
Minnesota -6.5
LOL you got that right ... As they say from my parts ."You are eating the dick" . Thats another way of saying -losing streak.. I will push thru it ..
I am looking for 20 units .no more no less.. I wish I had a system that made 60 units a year .. but I dont ...
If you want to follow thats great ..I assure you i am looking to make 20 units .. It might be a grind along the way , I am ready fo the ride ..... good luck
Tonights plays results - 2 units
Minnesota -6.5
Teams under .368 (As of Feb 5)
Teams ATS Current ATS Streak
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TODAYS GAMES 2/8
MIL at TOR
DET at NJ
LEAN/WATCH GAMES
NY at WAS
LAST several games
2/7 MIL
2/6 WAS , NO
2/4 NJ , NO , GS
2/3 BOS
2/2 POR
1/29 ATL , TOR
1/28 LAL
Teams under .368 (As of Feb 5)
Teams ATS Current ATS Streak
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TODAYS GAMES 2/8
MIL at TOR
DET at NJ
LEAN/WATCH GAMES
NY at WAS
LAST several games
2/7 MIL
2/6 WAS , NO
2/4 NJ , NO , GS
2/3 BOS
2/2 POR
1/29 ATL , TOR
1/28 LAL
Teams under .368 (As of Feb 9)
Teams ATS Current ATS Streak
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAC and GS are back on the follow list.
TODAYS GAMES 2/9
No Games
LEANS/WATCH
OKC at SAC
HOU at PHX
LAST several games
2/8 MIL , NJ
2/7 MIL
2/6 WAS , NO
2/4 NJ , NO , GS
2/3 BOS
2/2 POR
1/29 ATL , TOR
1/28 LAL
1/27 Den , NJ
1/25 NO
1/23 DAL , SA , ATL
1/22 BOS , NJ
1/21 MEM
1/18 BOS , DET , NJ
1/16 ATL (first post)
So this went 12-4 in Jan to 1-9 in Feb so far?
It seems like there should be some filter about the teams that are playing... in Jan I see alot more top teir teams playing our FADE list vs. in Feb it looks like it is all former FADE teams playing our FADE teams
Teams under .368 (As of Feb 9)
Teams ATS Current ATS Streak
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAC and GS are back on the follow list.
TODAYS GAMES 2/9
No Games
LEANS/WATCH
OKC at SAC
HOU at PHX
LAST several games
2/8 MIL , NJ
2/7 MIL
2/6 WAS , NO
2/4 NJ , NO , GS
2/3 BOS
2/2 POR
1/29 ATL , TOR
1/28 LAL
1/27 Den , NJ
1/25 NO
1/23 DAL , SA , ATL
1/22 BOS , NJ
1/21 MEM
1/18 BOS , DET , NJ
1/16 ATL (first post)
So this went 12-4 in Jan to 1-9 in Feb so far?
It seems like there should be some filter about the teams that are playing... in Jan I see alot more top teir teams playing our FADE list vs. in Feb it looks like it is all former FADE teams playing our FADE teams
Tonight the plays should be Chi -13.5 and NJ +2.5. I think what glef may be getting at in the above post is also what concerns me. What are the odds that really good teams blow out really terrible teams on the road in a shorten/condensed schedule?
Isn't the most likely scenario that Chicago gets up 20 in the late 3rd and early 4th and being on the road, looking ahead to other games, they coast through the 4th and like a football game, give up a "back-door" cover?
-13.5 is a big spread. I think this is where we might be getting burned in this system and it might become even more prevelant as the season progresses and teams get increasingly tired. There is no way Chicago is going to be worried about winning by 15 or 20. They are on the road against a brutal team. They want out without injuries, period.
Might be interesting to watch tonight. My money would be on NJ covering and Chicago not.
Tonight the plays should be Chi -13.5 and NJ +2.5. I think what glef may be getting at in the above post is also what concerns me. What are the odds that really good teams blow out really terrible teams on the road in a shorten/condensed schedule?
Isn't the most likely scenario that Chicago gets up 20 in the late 3rd and early 4th and being on the road, looking ahead to other games, they coast through the 4th and like a football game, give up a "back-door" cover?
-13.5 is a big spread. I think this is where we might be getting burned in this system and it might become even more prevelant as the season progresses and teams get increasingly tired. There is no way Chicago is going to be worried about winning by 15 or 20. They are on the road against a brutal team. They want out without injuries, period.
Might be interesting to watch tonight. My money would be on NJ covering and Chicago not.
Teams that are below 425 win percent , will rarely win more than 3 ATS in a row. Last yr you would have been up 27 units . I start the 2 game chase at 2 wins ATS I play 1 unit first game 2 units second game .. after that I take the 3 unit loss if it does not cover ..
todays play .. (already started )
ATL -10.5
I just back-tested this at Killersports accessing their extensive NBA data base which goes back at least to 1995 from the results of some of my queries.
The website I used is: https://killersports.com/nba.py/query?sid=guest&text=+&=1&submit=query
The query I entered is: WP<42.50 and p:ats margin>0 and p:WP<42.50 and pp:ats margin>0 and pp:WP<42.50 and ppp:ats margin>0 and ppp:WP<42.50
The results: 520-525-16 ATS. That means roughly half the time a team with a SU WP of less than 42.50 (< .450) at the time of the fourth game won that fourth game ATS after winning ATS its last three in a row when at each of those three games the team had a WP less than 42.50.
So .. of those 520 fourth game ATS wins, what was the result of the sub .450 team's fifth game ATS: 235-231-4.
I don't believe this system works.
If we only care about the team's WP during the fourth game only, the results ATS are: 536-549-18 .. and for the fifth game ATS: 242-241-6.
Again, nothing.
So how was this really for just last season (2010-2011)?
To the first query add "and season = 2010" .. 26-39-1 ATS in the fourth game .. 12-12-0 in the fifth game. (Note that when the fifth game test results don't add up to the fourth game ATS wins, it's because that team also won SU and its WP exceeded .425.)
The same for 2010 without considering the previous WP in the streak .. 27-41-1 ATS in the fourth game .. 12-12-0 in the fifth game.
Again .. nothing.
Back to the drawing board, I'm afraid.
Teams that are below 425 win percent , will rarely win more than 3 ATS in a row. Last yr you would have been up 27 units . I start the 2 game chase at 2 wins ATS I play 1 unit first game 2 units second game .. after that I take the 3 unit loss if it does not cover ..
todays play .. (already started )
ATL -10.5
I just back-tested this at Killersports accessing their extensive NBA data base which goes back at least to 1995 from the results of some of my queries.
The website I used is: https://killersports.com/nba.py/query?sid=guest&text=+&=1&submit=query
The query I entered is: WP<42.50 and p:ats margin>0 and p:WP<42.50 and pp:ats margin>0 and pp:WP<42.50 and ppp:ats margin>0 and ppp:WP<42.50
The results: 520-525-16 ATS. That means roughly half the time a team with a SU WP of less than 42.50 (< .450) at the time of the fourth game won that fourth game ATS after winning ATS its last three in a row when at each of those three games the team had a WP less than 42.50.
So .. of those 520 fourth game ATS wins, what was the result of the sub .450 team's fifth game ATS: 235-231-4.
I don't believe this system works.
If we only care about the team's WP during the fourth game only, the results ATS are: 536-549-18 .. and for the fifth game ATS: 242-241-6.
Again, nothing.
So how was this really for just last season (2010-2011)?
To the first query add "and season = 2010" .. 26-39-1 ATS in the fourth game .. 12-12-0 in the fifth game. (Note that when the fifth game test results don't add up to the fourth game ATS wins, it's because that team also won SU and its WP exceeded .425.)
The same for 2010 without considering the previous WP in the streak .. 27-41-1 ATS in the fourth game .. 12-12-0 in the fifth game.
Again .. nothing.
Back to the drawing board, I'm afraid.
I learned their query by reading their teaching guide: https://killersports.com/NBA/PDF/query_manual.pdf .
Just go to the link I provided in my previous post and use this guide and teach yourself. That's the best way, I would guess.
I learned their query by reading their teaching guide: https://killersports.com/NBA/PDF/query_manual.pdf .
Just go to the link I provided in my previous post and use this guide and teach yourself. That's the best way, I would guess.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.